Voetproblemen bij diabetes: wat kan de orthopedisch chirurg doen?

status: publishe

The Biomechanical Behavior of Distal Foot Joints in Patients with Isolated, End-Stage Tibiotalar Osteoarthritis Is Not Altered Following Tibiotalar Fusion

Ankle arthrodesis is considered to be an optimal treatment strategy to relieve pain during walking in patients with isolated, end-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-operative effect of an arthrodesis on the ankle and foot joint biomechanics. We included both patients (n = 10) and healthy reference data (n = 17). A multi-segment foot model was used to measure the kinematics and kinetics of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and first metatarsophalangeal joints during a three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis. These data, together with patient reported outcome measures, were collected at baseline (pre-operative) and one year post-operatively. Patients experienced a decrease in pain and an increase in general well-being after surgery. Compared to the baseline measurements, patients only demonstrated a significant average post-operative increase of 0.22 W/kg of power absorption in the ankle joint. No other significant differences were observed between baseline and post-operative measurements. Current findings suggest that the biomechanical behavior of distal foot joints is not altered one year after fusion. The pain relief achieved by the arthrodesis improved the loading patterns during walking. Clinical significance of this study dictates that patients do not have to fear a loss in biomechanical functionality after an ankle arthrodesis.status: publishe

The Biomechanical Behavior of Distal Foot Joints in Patients with Isolated, End-Stage Tibiotalar Osteoarthritis Is Not Altered Following Tibiotalar Fusion

Ankle arthrodesis is considered to be an optimal treatment strategy to relieve pain during walking in patients with isolated, end-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-operative effect of an arthrodesis on the ankle and foot joint biomechanics. We included both patients (n = 10) and healthy reference data (n = 17). A multi-segment foot model was used to measure the kinematics and kinetics of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and first metatarsophalangeal joints during a three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis. These data, together with patient reported outcome measures, were collected at baseline (pre-operative) and one year post-operatively. Patients experienced a decrease in pain and an increase in general well-being after surgery. Compared to the baseline measurements, patients only demonstrated a significant average post-operative increase of 0.22 W/kg of power absorption in the ankle joint. No other significant differences were observed between baseline and post-operative measurements. Current findings suggest that the biomechanical behavior of distal foot joints is not altered one year after fusion. The pain relief achieved by the arthrodesis improved the loading patterns during walking. Clinical significance of this study dictates that patients do not have to fear a loss in biomechanical functionality after an ankle arthrodesis

Epidemiology an early management of acute Charcot foot in a tertiary diabetic foot clinic in Belgium

status: publishe

Charcot foot attacks in a non-transplanted Diabetes Mellitus population: the importance of corticosteroids as a causative factor

status: publishe

Syme amputation, a limb saving alternative with preservation of mobility in a middle-aged population with limited impaired bloodflow

status: publishe

Estimation of foot joint kinetics in three and four segment foot models using an existing proportionality scheme: Application in paediatric barefoot walking

Recent studies which estimated foot segment kinetic patterns were found to have inconclusive data on one hand, and did not dissociate the kinetics of the chopart and lisfranc joint. The current study aimed therefore at reproducing independent, recently published three-segment foot kinetic data (Study 1) and in a second stage expand the estimation towards a four-segment model (Study 2). Concerning the reproducibility study, two recently published three segment foot models (Bruening et al., 2014; Saraswat et al., 2014) were reproduced and kinetic parameters were incorporated in order to calculate joint moments and powers of paediatric cohorts during gait. Ground reaction forces were measured with an integrated force/pressure plate measurement set-up and a recently published proportionality scheme was applied to determine subarea total ground reaction forces. Regarding Study 2, moments and powers were estimated with respect to the Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli four-segment model. The proportionality scheme was expanded in this study and the impact of joint centre location on kinetic data was evaluated. Findings related to Study 1 showed in general good agreement with the kinetic data published by Bruening et al. (2014). Contrarily, the peak ankle, midfoot and hallux powers published by Saraswat et al. (2014) are disputed. Findings of Study 2 revealed that the chopart joint encompasses both power absorption and generation, whereas the Lisfranc joint mainly contributes to power generation. The results highlights the necessity for further studies in the field of foot kinetic models and provides a first estimation of the kinetic behaviour of the Lisfranc joint.status: publishe

The Receptive and Propulsive Behavior of Human Foot Joints During Running With Different Striking Strategies

Foot structure and kinematics have long been considered as risk factors for foot and lower-limb running injuries. The authors aimed at investigating foot joint kinetics to unravel their receptive and propulsive characteristics while running barefoot, both with rearfoot and with midfoot striking strategies. Power absorption and generation occurring at different joints of the foot in 6 asymptomatic adults were calculated using both a 3-segment and a 4-segment kinetic model. An inverse dynamic approach was used to quantify mechanical power. Major power absorption and generation characteristics were observed at the ankle joint complex as well as at the Chopart joint in both the rearfoot and the midfoot striking strategies. The power at the Lisfranc joint, quantified by the 4-segment kinetic model, was predominantly generated in both strategies, and at the toes, it was absorbed. The overall results show a large variability in the receptive and propulsive characteristics among the analyzed joints in both striking strategies. The present study may provide novel insight for clinical decision making to address foot and lower-limb injuries and to guide athletes in the adoption of different striking strategies during running.status: publishe

Quantifying clinical misinterpretations associated to one-segment kinetic foot modelling in both a healthy and patient population

BACKGROUND: Rigid foot modelling approaches are still widely used to assess ankle joint kinetics in clinical biomechanical research. Yet, studies on healthy subjects using multi-segment kinetic foot models indicated that one-segment kinetic foot models tend to overestimate ankle joint kinetic data. Our aim was to compare ankle joint kinetics computed with a one-segment versus a multi-segment kinetic foot model in both asymptomatic and pathological gait. We also assessed whether differences between models can lead to different interpretations in clinical decision-making. METHODS: A two-factor repeated measure analysis of variance was performed to investigate differences in ankle joint kinetics, with the first factor being group effect (control vs. patients) and second factor being foot model effect (one-segment vs. multi-segment). Minimal detectable change was calculated to assess the clinical relevance of the observed differences in ankle joint kinetics. FINDINGS: Ankle joint peak kinematic, angular velocity and kinetic variables were all significantly overestimated (P < 0.05) when computed with the one-segment kinetic foot model. Kinetic differences in peak plantarflexion angular velocity and peak power generation were higher than their MDC-values. INTERPRETATION: Ankle joint kinetics are significantly overestimated when computed with a rigid foot modelling approach in both asymptomatic and pathological gait. This overestimation leads to clinical misinterpretations as MDC-values were less than the observed overestimation. In future studies, it is of clinical relevance to assess ankle joint kinetics with a multi-segment foot modelling approach.status: publishe