20 research outputs found

    Solvation and Hydrogen Bonding in Alanine- and Glycine-Containing Dipeptides Probed Using Solutionand Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy

    No full text
    The NMR chemical shift is a sensitive reporter of peptide secondary structure and its solvation environment, and it is potentially rich with information about both backbone dihedral angles and hydrogen bonding. We report results from solution- and solid-state 13C and 15N NMR studies of four zwitterionic model dipeptides, l-alanyl-l-alanine, l-alanyl-glycine, glycyl-l-alanine, and glycyl-glycine, in which we attempt to isolate structural and environmental contributions to the chemical shift. We have mapped hydrogen-bonding patterns in the crystalline states of these dipeptides using the published crystal structures and correlated them with 13C and 15N magic angle spinning chemical shift data. To aid in the interpretation of the solvated chemical shifts, we performed ab initio quantum chemical calculations to determine the low-energy conformers and their chemical shifts. Assuming low energy barriers to interconversion between thermally accessible conformers, we compare the Boltzmann-averaged chemical shifts with the experimentally determined solvated-state shifts. The results allow us to correlate the observed differences in chemical shifts between the crystalline and solvated states to changes in conformation and hydrogen bonding that occur upon solvation

    Simulated <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> values, based on RMSD, Total Energy and Contact number.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Scatter plot of <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> (RMSD) vs. <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> (Total energy), with <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> (contact number) represented by color (see color bar to right of plot). The green ball denotes WT and the gold ball denotes the destabilized mutant I155A. The correlation coefficients of simulated <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> between RMSD and total energy, RMSD and Contact number, and Contact number and total energy were 0.68, 0.79 and 0.84, respectively. (B) Histogram of <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> values, determined by averaging the values obtained from RMSD, energy, and contact number. The vertical red line denotes WT <i>T</i><sub>m.</sub></p

    A sample WT DHFR unfolding trajectory at simulation temperature 1.5 (arbitrary simulation units).

    No full text
    <p>In MC simulations, separation of the C-terminal beta hairpin from the rest of the protein (steps 1,000,000 through 1,200,000) is an early event in the unfolding process.</p

    Simulation results on non-DHFR proteins.

    No full text
    <p>Error number and error rate describe the number and fraction of mutations not predicted in the correct direction (stabilizing vs. destabilizing)</p><p>Simulation results on non-DHFR proteins.</p

    The effect of replication number and number of MC steps on simulation predictive power.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Correlation between simulated <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> and experimental <i>T</i><sub>m</sub>, averaging over different numbers of replications, for the DHFR wild type and mutants. Each protein was simulated for 2,000,000 MC steps, following MD minimization and equilibration at low temperature. (B) Correlation between the simulated <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> and experimental <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> with different numbers of MC steps and 50 replications, for the DHFR wild type and mutants. Each protein was first simulated for the number of steps given on the x-axis, and the next 100,000 steps were averaged in determining the simulated <i>T</i><sub>m</sub>.</p

    Correlation between <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> values for simulations of different lengths.

    No full text
    <p>WT is shown as a blue triangle and mutant I155A as a red diamond. (A) <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> calculated from simulation RMSD, for short (2,000,000-step) and long (20,000,000-step) simulations. Simulation <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> is clearly smaller for long simulations, in which the protein has more time to unfold. (B) Relative <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> normalized to WT, for short and long simulations. Remarkably, the points fall nearly on the line y = x, with a correlation of 0.86, with one distinct outlier I155A.</p

    WT DHFR unfolding curves from MC simulations, averaged over 2,000,000 simulation steps, with 50 replications.

    No full text
    <p>The <i>T</i><sub>m</sub> value was calculated based on the sigmoidal fit (solid blue line). (A) RMSD vs. simulation temperature. (B) Number of contacts vs. simulation temperature.</p

    The simulated and experimental results of the selected single point mutants and WT.

    No full text
    <p>Note: The data were averaged over 50 replications. 2,000,000 MC steps were simulated in total, and the last 1,000,000 steps were used to calculate <i>T</i><sub>m</sub>.</p><p>The units: <i>T</i><sub>m</sub>: °C, <i>C</i><sub>m</sub>: M, <i>k</i><sub>cat</sub>: s<sup>−1</sup>, <i>k</i><sub>cat</sub>∕<i>K</i><sub>M</sub>: s<sup>−1</sup> μM<sup>−1</sup></p><p>The simulated and experimental results of the selected single point mutants and WT.</p
    corecore