6 research outputs found
The Influence of Stepwise P‑Oxidation on the Coordination and Redox Behavior of W–Bisphosalkyne Complex Ligands
The terminal phosphine
groups at the tungsten bisphosphine alkyne
complex [Tp*W(CO)(I)(η<sup>2</sup>-<i>C,C</i>′-Ph<sub>2</sub>PC<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)] (<b>2</b>) {Tp* = hydridotris(3,4,5-trimethylpyrazolyl)borate}
were selectively oxidized by common methods to form the alkyne complexes <b>2EE</b> (E = O, S) with either two phosphine oxide or two phosphine
sulfide substituents. The respective mono-oxidized analogues <b>2E</b> (E = O, S) were obtained by subjecting the already oxidized
intermediates [Tp*W(CO)(I)(η<sup>2</sup>-<i>C,C</i>′-Ph<sub>2</sub>P(E)C<sub>2</sub>H)] <b>1E</b> (E =
O, S) to a late-stage phosphine introduction at the complex template.
These modulations of the peripheral alkyne moiety have a clear impact
on the redox potential of the metal-based oxidation altering the W(II/III)
potential by +0.1 V on average per oxidized phosphine. In contrast
to the comparable redox behavior of <b>2O</b> and <b>2S</b>, the coordination behavior of these complex ligands differs substantially.
XRD studies show that complex <b>2</b> and the sulfide <b>2S</b> act either as a <i>P</i>,<i>P’</i>- or <i>P</i>,<i>S</i>-chelate ligand leading
to the dinuclear complexes [(<b>2</b>)PdCl<sub>2</sub>], <b>3</b>, and [(<b>2S)</b>PdCl<sub>2</sub>], <b>3S</b>. In contrast, the corresponding PdCl<sub>2</sub> complex of the
monoxide <b>2O</b> is connected by the free phosphine group
and the W-bonded iodide as a μ<sup>2</sup>-bridging ligand leaving
the phosphine oxide pending. A similar binding mode was found for
the trinuclear gold complex [(<b>2</b>)<sub>2</sub>Au][PF<sub>6</sub>] (<b>5</b>-PF<sub>6</sub>). Furthermore, these findings
explain the undesired outcome in the reaction of [Pd(NCMe)<sub>4</sub>][BF<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub> with two equivalents of <b>2</b>, which resulted in the iodide abstraction product [(<b>2</b>)PdI<sub>2</sub>] (<b>4</b>)
A New Class of Azadipnictiridines Generated by an Unusual Rearrangement Reaction
Dipnictadiazanediyls, [E(μ-NR)]<sub>2</sub> (E = P, As), the pnictogen analogues of cyclobutandiyl, were
found to react readily with alkynes forming [2.1.1]bicyclic structures.
These, in turn, rearrange in an unprecedented reaction to [3.1.o]bicycles
leading to the isolation of the first azadiarsiridine and the determination
of its solid-state structure. All new species were comprehensively
characterized, and the reaction pathways and bonding situations were
computationally studied
Ultrafast Energy Transfer in Dinuclear Complexes with Bridging 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-Dithiolate
We report herein
the preparation and characterization of dinuclear complexes with the
bridging ligand 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dithiolate (<b>phendt<sup>2–</sup></b>) bearing Ru(bpy)<sub>2</sub> or Ir(ppy)<sub>2</sub> at the diimine moiety and Ni(dppe), Ni(dppf), CoCp, RhCp*,
and Ru(<i>p</i>-Me-<sup>i</sup>Pr-benzene) at the dithiolate
unit. In comparison with the mononuclear precursors used in the synthesis,
all dinuclear complexes were characterized by absorption and photoluminescence
spectroscopy as well as cyclic voltammetry. Because of the beneficial
spectral and electrochemical properties of the Ir/Co complex for a
light-driven charge separation, this complex was investigated in detail
by time-resolved luminescence {nanosecond (ns)-resolution} and transient
absorption spectroscopy {femtosecond (fs)-resolution}. All measurements
supported by DFT calculations show that the observed effective luminescence
quenching by the dithiolate coordinated metal is caused by an ultrafast
singlet–singlet Dexter energy transfer
Understanding the Excited State Behavior of Cyclometalated Bis(tridentate)ruthenium(II) Complexes: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
The synthesis and characterization
of the donor–acceptor substituted cyclometalated ruthenium(II)
polypyridine complex isomers [Ru(dpb-NHCOMe)(tpy-COOEt)](PF<sub>6</sub>) <b>1</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) and [Ru(dpb-COOEt)(tpy-NHCOMe)](PF<sub>6</sub>) <b>2</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) (dpbH = 1,3-dipyridin-2-ylbenzene,
tpy = 2,2′;6,2″-terpyridine) with inverted functional
group pattern are described. A combination of resonance Raman spectroscopic
and computational techniques shows that all intense visible range
absorption bands arise from mixed Ru → tpy/Ru → dpb
metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excitations. <b>2</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) is weakly phosphorescent at room temperature in
fluid solution and strongly emissive at 77 K in solid butyronitrile
matrix, which is typical for ruthenium(II) polypyridine complexes.
Density functional theory calculations revealed that the weak emission
of <b>2</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) arises from a <sup>3</sup>MLCT state
that is efficiently thermally depopulated via metal-centered (<sup>3</sup>MC) excited states. The activation barrier for the deactivation
process was estimated experimentally from variable-temperature emission
spectroscopic measurements as 11 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup>. In contrast, <b>1</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) is nonemissive at room temperature in fluid
solution and at 77 K in solid butyronitrile matrix. Examination of
the electronic excited states of <b>1</b>(PF<sub>6</sub>) revealed
a ligand-to-ligand charge-transfer (<sup>3</sup>LL′CT) as lowest-energy
triplet state due to the very strong push–pull effect across
the metal center. Because of the orthogonality of the participating
ligands, emission from the <sup>3</sup>LL′CT is symmetry-forbidden.
Hence, in this type of complex a stronger push–pull effect
does not increase the phosphorescence quantum yields but completely
quenches the emission
Spontaneous Formation of an η<sup>4</sup>‑Ethylene Bis(carbene) Ligand by Alkyne Coupling at Rhenium(III)
The C/C coupling activity of the
cationic Re(III) species [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ReBr]<sup>+</sup> with different heteroatom-substituted
alkynes was investigated. By using the sulfide-substituted bis(benzylsulfanyl)acetylene
an unprecedented rhenacyclopentatriene complex was obtained. An XRD
structure determination of [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ReBr(CSBn)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>+</sup> uncovered the coordination of the remote ethylene
moiety at Re leading to an η<sup>4</sup>-coordination mode of
the C<sub>4</sub>(SBn)<sub>4</sub> ligand and a folded five-membered
metallacycle. In contrast, reaction of the monoalkyne complex [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ReBr(CSBn)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> with diphenylacetylene
as well as diiodoacetylene led to the mixed bis(alkyne) complexes.
The different behavior is attributed to kinetic reasons according
to DFT calculations. XRD as well as IR studies with the cationic bis(alkyne)
complexes [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ReBr(CSBn)<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>Ph<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> and [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ReBr(CSBn)<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>I<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> revealed
clear differences in the bond strengths of the coordinated alkynes
at the same metal center. Further investigations on the coupling activity
resulted in addition products with H<sub>2</sub>O and a trimerization
of two diphenylacetylene molecules and one bis(benzylsulfanyl)acetylene,
both as byproducts and involved in a sulfide bond cleavage
Dinuclear Ru/Ni, Ir/Ni, and Ir/Pt Complexes with Bridging Phenanthroline-5,6-dithiolate: Synthesis, Structure, and Electrochemical and Photophysical Behavior
We report the synthesis
and full characterization of dinuclear complexes with the bridging
ligand phenanthroline-5,6-dithiolate (phendt<sup>2–</sup>)
featuring the [Ru(bpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> or Ir(ppy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> fragment at the diimine donor center and the [Ni(dppe)]<sup>2+</sup> or [Pt(phen)]<sup>2+</sup> complex moiety at the dithiolate
group. The molecular structures of the mononuclear complexes [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Ti(<i>S</i>,<i>S</i>′-phendt)] and [(ppy)<sub>2</sub>Ir{<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′-phendt-(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>}](PF<sub>6</sub>) as well as the dinuclear complex [(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)Ru(phendt)Ni(dppe)](PF<sub>6</sub>) determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies are compared. Photophysical
studies with mononuclear [(bpy)<sub>2</sub>Ru{phendt-(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>}]<sup>2+</sup> and [(ppy)<sub>2</sub>Ir{phendt-(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>}]<sup>+</sup> as well as dinuclear [(bpy)<sub>2</sub>Ru(phendt)Ni(dppe)]<sup>2+</sup> and [(ppy)<sub>2</sub>Ir(phendt)Ni(dppe)]<sup>+</sup> uncovered
an effective luminescence quenching in the dinuclear complexes. Lifetime
measurements at room temperature, steady-state measurements at low
temperature, electrochemical investigations, and DFT calculations
provide evidence for a very efficient energy transfer from the Ru/Ir
to the Ni complex moiety with a rate constant <i>k</i> >
5 × 10<sup>9</sup> s<sup>–1</sup>. In comparison, the
[Ru]phendt[Ni] complex displays a higher quenching efficiency with
reduced excited state lifetime, whereas the [Ir]phendt[Ni] complex
is characterized by an unaltered lifetime of the thermally equilibrated
excited state