Acute and short-term effects of the nonpeptide endothelin-1 receptor antagonist bosentan in humans

Summary: In recent years, evidence from various animal experiments has accumulated that emphasizes the role of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular diseases, including congestive heart failure. The recent advent of potent antagonists of this system now allows the assessment of the involvement of endothelin-1 in the maintenance of vascular tone in animals and humans. We report hemodynamic data from two trails in patients with chronic severe congestive heart failure (i.e., reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 15 mmHg, and/or reduced cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or less) who were treated with the mixed endothelin-type A and type B-receptor antagonist bosentan. In the first study, the acute effect of bosentan (300 mg, intravenous) on hemodynamics and neurohormones was investigated. Bosentan was well tolerated and significantly improved impaired hemodynamics due to systemic and venous vasodilation. In the second trial, bosentan was given orally (0.5 g bid) for 14 days, in addition to conventional triple treatment for congestive heart failure, including digitalis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. Cardiac hemodynamics were monitored during the first 24 hours of treatment, and measurements were repeated during the last day of bosentan therapy. Bosentan was well tolerated in these patients as well, and hemodynamic measures were compatible with an additional effect of bosentan after 2 weeks. However, there was a slight increase in heart rate as well. Our result underline the importance of endogenously generated endothelin-1 in congestive heart failure and suggest a potential benefit of endothelin antagonism in such patients. However, long-term studies are needed to establish whether chronic endothelin antagonism has beneficial clinical effects and is capable of improving survival and/or symptoms in severe heart failure patients who remain symptomatic despite standard triple therap

Effect of beta adrenoceptor antagonists on baroreceptor reflex sensitivity in hypertension

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117108/1/cpt1977223293.pd

Antihypertensive and β‐adrenoceptor antagonist action of timolol

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117050/1/cpt1978232152.pd

Therapeutic benefits of increasing natriuretic peptide levels

Natriuretic peptides play an important role in water and salt homeostasis and in the regulation of the cardiovascular system. In recent years, exogenous administration of natriuretic peptides has primarily been used to improve our understanding of the role of natriuretic peptides. Also, it became evident that natriuretic peptides may be used therapeutically. Because of their peptide character, they cannot be administered orally and, therefore, may be used for short-term intravenous therapy only. In recent years, inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase, which degrades natriuretic peptides to inactive metabolites, have been investigated. This review focuses on the potential benefits of increasing natriuretic peptide levels, either through exogenous administration or inhibiting the degradation of endogenous natriuretic peptide

Effects of anti-ischaemic drug therapy in silent myocardial ischaemia type I: the Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischaemia type I (SWISSI I): a randomized, controlled pilot study

Aims To determine the effect of anti-ischaemic drug therapy on long-term outcomes of asymptomatic patients without coronary artery disease (CAD) history but silent exercise ST-depression. Methods and results In a randomized multicentre trial, 263 of 522 asymptomatic subjects without CAD but at least one CAD risk factor in whom silent ischaemia by exercise ECG was confirmed by stress imaging were asked to participate. The 54 (21%) consenting patients were randomized to anti-anginal drug therapy in addition to risk factor control (MED, n = 26) or risk factor control-only (RFC, n = 28). They were followed yearly for 11.2 ± 2.2 years. During 483 patient-years, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or acute coronary syndrome requiring hospitalization or revascularization occurred in 3 (12%) of MED vs. 17 (61%) of RFC patients (P < 0.001). In addition, MED patients had consistently lower rates of exercise-induced ischaemia during follow-up, and left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged (−0.7%, P = 0.597) in contrast to RFC patients in whom it decreased over time (−6.0%, P = 0.006). Conclusion Anti-ischaemic drug therapy and aspirin seem to reduce cardiac events in subjects with asymptomatic ischaemia type I. In such patients, exercise-induced ST-segment depression should be verified by stress imaging; if silent ischaemia is documented, anti-ischaemic drug therapy and aspirin should be considere

End-of-life preferences of elderly patients with chronic heart failure

Aims Elderly heart failure (HF) patients are assumed to prefer improved quality of life over longevity, but sufficient data are lacking. Therefore, we assessed the willingness to trade survival time for quality-of-life (QoL) and the preferences for resuscitation. Methods and results At baseline and after 12 and 18 months, 622 HF patients aged ≥60 years (77 ± 8 years, 74% NYHA-class ≥III) participating in the Trial of Intensified vs. standard Medical therapy in Elderly patients with Congestive Heart Failure had prospective evaluation of end-of-life preferences by answering trade-off questions (willingness to accept a shorter life span in return for living without symptoms) and preferences for resuscitation if necessary. The time trade-off question was answered by 555 patients (89%), 74% of whom were not willing to trade survival time for improved QoL. This proportion increased over time (Month 12: 85%, Month 18: 87%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, willingness to trade survival time increased with age, female sex, a reduced Duke Activity Status Index, Geriatric Depression Score, and history of gout, exercise intolerance, constipation and oedema, but even combining these variables did not result in reliable prediction. Of 603 (97%) patients expressing their resuscitation preference, 51% wished resuscitation, 39% did not, and 10% were undecided, with little changes over time. In 430 patients resuscitation orders were known; they differed from patients' preferences 32% of the time. End-of-life preferences were not correlated to 18-month outcome. Conclusion Elderly HF patients are willing to address their end-of-life preferences. The majority prefers longevity over QoL and half wished resuscitation if necessary. Prediction of individual preferences was inaccurate. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN4359647

Acute and short-term effects of the nonpeptide endothelin-1 receptor antagonist bosentan in humans

In recent years, evidence from various animal experiments has accumulated that emphasizes the role of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular diseases, including congestive heart failure. The recent advent of potent antagonists of this system now allows the assessment of the involvement of endothelin-1 in the maintenance of vascular tone in animals and humans. We report hemodynamic data from two trails in patients with chronic severe congestive heart failure (i.e., reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 15 mmHg, and/or reduced cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or less) who were treated with the mixed endothelin-type A and type B-receptor antagonist bosentan. In the first study, the acute effect of bosentan (300 mg, intravenous) on hemodynamics and neurohormones was investigated. Bosentan was well tolerated and significantly improved impaired hemodynamics due to systemic and venous vasodilation. In the second trial, bosentan was given orally (0.5 g bid) for 14 days, in addition to conventional triple treatment for congestive heart failure, including digitalis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. Cardiac hemodynamics were monitored during the first 24 hours of treatment, and measurements were repeated during the last day of bosentan therapy. Bosentan was well tolerated in these patients as well, and hemodynamic measures were compatible with an additional effect of bosentan after 2 weeks. However, there was a slight increase in heart rate as well. Our result underline the importance of endogenously generated endothelin-1 in congestive heart failure and suggest a potential benefit of endothelin antagonism in such patients. However, long-term studies are needed to establish whether chronic endothelin antagonism has beneficial clinical effects and is capable of improving survival and/or symptoms in severe heart failure patients who remain symptomatic despite standard triple therap