8 research outputs found

    Effects of short-term intermittent hypoxia (IH) and high-fat diet (HFD) on body weight, food intake, liver mass, epididymal fat pad, lipid metabolism, and liver triglyceride content in mice.

    No full text
    <p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation;</p><p>*<i>p</i><0.05 vs IA-SD.</p><p><sup>#</sup><i>p</i><0.05 vs IA-HFD mice.</p><p><sup>§</sup> p<0.05 vs IH-SD. IA intermittent air, IH intermittent hypoxia, SD standard diet, HFD high fat diet</p><p>Effects of short-term intermittent hypoxia (IH) and high-fat diet (HFD) on body weight, food intake, liver mass, epididymal fat pad, lipid metabolism, and liver triglyceride content in mice.</p

    Western blotting performed in aortas from intermittent air with standard diet (IA-SD), intermittent hypoxia with standard diet (IH-SD), intermittent air and high fat diet (IA-HFD) and intermittent hypoxia and high fat diet (IH-HFD) mice using antibodies raised against (a) eNOS, (b) phospho-eNOS Ser 1177, (c) phospho-eNOS Thr 495.

    No full text
    <p>Immunoblots were quantified by densitometric analysis. Data are representative of 3–4 separate blots representing aorta lysates from 3–4 different mice. Densitometry values are expressed in arbitrary units (A.U.) as mean ± standard deviation. (d) The ratio of phosphorylation of eNOS at the inhibitor site (Thr 495) and activation site (Ser 1177) is expressed in arbitrary units (A.U.) as mean ± standard deviation and represent n = 3–4 mice *<i>p</i>< 0.05, **<i>p</i> <0.01.</p

    Study population at baseline.

    No full text
    <p>Values expressed as mean (SD) or n (%). BMI = body mass index, LTOT = long-term oxygen therapy, OHS = obesity hypoventilation syndrome, ICU = intensive care unit, FEV<sub>1</sub> = forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC = forced vital capacity, IPAP = inspiratory partial airway pressure, EPAP = expiratory partial airway pressure, Min RR = minimal respiratory rate</p><p>Study population at baseline.</p

    Comparison of NIV efficacy at 6 months in patients aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years.

    No full text
    <p>Δ: variation between baseline and 6 months</p><p>*p value < 0.05</p><p><sup>†</sup>percentage of patients with initial Epworth scale score over 10</p><p><sup>§</sup> percentage of patients with initial Pittsburgh sleep quality index over 7</p><p><sup>‡</sup>p value for comparison of Δ between ≥ 75 and < 75</p><p>ESS: Epworth scale score, PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index</p><p>Comparison of NIV efficacy at 6 months in patients aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years.</p

    Comparison of the impact of NIV on HRQL evaluated by SF-36 in patients aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years.

    No full text
    <p>Values expressed as mean (SD).</p><p>Δ: variation between baseline and 6 months</p><p>*p value < 0.05</p><p><sup>‡</sup>p value for comparison of Δ between ≥ 75 and < 75</p><p>PCS: physical component summary, MCS: mental component summary</p><p>Comparison of the impact of NIV on HRQL evaluated by SF-36 in patients aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years.</p
    corecore