5 research outputs found
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib The CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed with
advanced disease not eligible for potentially curative therapies; therefore, new treatment
options are needed. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab may improve clinical outcomes
compared with nivolumab monotherapy.
OBJECTIVE To assess efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with
advanced HCC who were previously treated with sorafenib.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS CheckMate 040 is a multicenter, open-label,
multicohort, phase 1/2 study. In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab cohort, patients were
randomized between January 4 and September 26, 2016. Treatment group information was
blinded after randomization. Median follow-up was 30.7 months. Data cutoff for this analysis
was January 2019. Patients were recruited at 31 centers in 10 countries/territories in Asia,
Europe, and North America. Eligible patients had advanced HCC (with/without hepatitis B or
C) previously treated with sorafenib. A total of 148 patients were randomized (50 to arm A
and 49 each to arms B and C).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to either nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3
mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses), followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks
(arm A); nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses),
followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (arm B); or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks
plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks (arm C).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Coprimary end points were safety, tolerability, and objective
response rate. Duration of response was also measured (investigator assessed with the
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1).
RESULTS Of 148 total participants, 120 were male (81%). Median (IQR) age was 60
(52.5-66.5). At data cutoff (January 2019), the median follow-up was 30.7 months (IQR,
29.9-34.7). Investigator-assessed objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 20%-47%) in
arm A, 27% (95% CI, 15%-41%) in arm B, and 29% (95% CI, 17%-43%) in arm C. Median
(range) duration of response was not reached (8.3-33.7+) in arm A and was 15.2 months
(4.2-29.9+) in arm B and 21.7 months (2.8-32.7+) in arm C. Any-grade treatment-related
adverse events were reported in 46 of 49 patients (94%) in arm A, 35 of 49 patients (71%) in
arm B, and 38 of 48 patients (79%) in arm C; there was 1 treatment-related death (arm A;
grade 5 pneumonitis).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab
had manageable safety, promising objective response rate, and durable responses. The arm A
regimen (4 doses nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks then nivolumab
240 mg every 2 weeks) received accelerated approval in the US based on the results of this
study.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0165887
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib The CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed with
advanced disease not eligible for potentially curative therapies; therefore, new treatment
options are needed. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab may improve clinical outcomes
compared with nivolumab monotherapy.
OBJECTIVE To assess efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with
advanced HCC who were previously treated with sorafenib.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS CheckMate 040 is a multicenter, open-label,
multicohort, phase 1/2 study. In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab cohort, patients were
randomized between January 4 and September 26, 2016. Treatment group information was
blinded after randomization. Median follow-up was 30.7 months. Data cutoff for this analysis
was January 2019. Patients were recruited at 31 centers in 10 countries/territories in Asia,
Europe, and North America. Eligible patients had advanced HCC (with/without hepatitis B or
C) previously treated with sorafenib. A total of 148 patients were randomized (50 to arm A
and 49 each to arms B and C).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to either nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3
mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses), followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks
(arm A); nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses),
followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (arm B); or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks
plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks (arm C).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Coprimary end points were safety, tolerability, and objective
response rate. Duration of response was also measured (investigator assessed with the
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1).
RESULTS Of 148 total participants, 120 were male (81%). Median (IQR) age was 60
(52.5-66.5). At data cutoff (January 2019), the median follow-up was 30.7 months (IQR,
29.9-34.7). Investigator-assessed objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 20%-47%) in
arm A, 27% (95% CI, 15%-41%) in arm B, and 29% (95% CI, 17%-43%) in arm C. Median
(range) duration of response was not reached (8.3-33.7+) in arm A and was 15.2 months
(4.2-29.9+) in arm B and 21.7 months (2.8-32.7+) in arm C. Any-grade treatment-related
adverse events were reported in 46 of 49 patients (94%) in arm A, 35 of 49 patients (71%) in
arm B, and 38 of 48 patients (79%) in arm C; there was 1 treatment-related death (arm A;
grade 5 pneumonitis).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab
had manageable safety, promising objective response rate, and durable responses. The arm A
regimen (4 doses nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks then nivolumab
240 mg every 2 weeks) received accelerated approval in the US based on the results of this
study.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0165887
CheckMate 040 cohort 5: A phase I/II study of nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis
Background & Aims: Patients with advanced hepatocellular
carcinoma (aHCC) and Child-Pugh B liver function are often
excluded from clinical trials. In previous studies, overall survival
for these patients treated with sorafenib was 3–5 months; thus,
new treatments are needed. Nivolumab, alone or in combination
with ipilimumab, is conditionally approved in the United States
to treat patients with aHCC who previously received sorafenib.
We describe nivolumab monotherapy outcomes in patients with
Child-Pugh B status.
Methods: This phase I/II, open-label, non-comparative, multicentre trial (27 centres) included patients with Child-Pugh B
(B7–B8) aHCC. Patients received intravenous nivolumab 240 mg
every 2 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by
investigator assessment (using Response Evaluation Criteria in
Solid Tumors v1.1) and duration of response. Safety was assessed
using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for
Adverse Events v4.0.
Results: Twenty-five sorafenib-naive and 24 sorafenib-treated
patients began treatment between November 2016 and
October 2017 (median follow-up, 16.3 months). Investigatorassessed ORR was 12% (95% CI 5–25%) with 6 patients responding; disease control rate was 55% (95% CI 40–69%). Median time
to response was 2.7 months (interquartile range, 1.4–4.2), and
median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI 9.7–9.9).
Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 25
patients (51%) and led to discontinuation in 2 patients (4%).
The most frequent grade 3/4 TRAEs were hypertransaminasemia
(n = 2), amylase increase (n = 2), and aspartate aminotransferase
increase (n = 2). The safety of nivolumab was comparable to that
in patients with Child-Pugh A aHCC.
Conclusions: Nivolumab showed clinical activity and favourable
safety with manageable toxicities, suggesting it could be suitable
for patients with Child-Pugh B aHCC.
Lay summary: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, almost all systemic therapies require very good liver
function, i.e. Child-Pugh A status. The evidence from this study
suggests that nivolumab shows clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with
Child-Pugh B status who have mild to moderate impairment of
liver function or liver decompensation that might rule out other
therapies. Further studies are warranted to assess the safety and
efficacy of nivolumab in this patient population
Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
Background: Single-agent nivolumab showed durable responses, manageable safety, and promising survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the phase 1-2 CheckMate 040 study. We aimed to investigate nivolumab monotherapy compared with sorafenib monotherapy in the first-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at medical centres across 22 countries and territories in Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America, patients at least 18 years old with histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for, or whose disease had progressed after, surgery or locoregional treatment; with no previous systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, with Child-Pugh class A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and regardless of viral hepatitis status were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02576509.
Findings: Between Jan 11, 2016, and May 24, 2017, 743 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (nivolumab, n=371; sorafenib, n=372). At the primary analysis, the median follow-up for overall survival was 15·2 months (IQR 5·7-28·0) for the nivolumab group and 13·4 months (5·7-25·9) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 16·4 months (95% CI 13·9-18·4) with nivolumab and 14·7 months (11·9-17·2) with sorafenib (hazard ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·72-1·02]; p=0·075; minimum follow-up 22·8 months); the protocol-defined significance level of p=0·0419 was not reached. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (1 [<1%] of 367 patients in the nivolumab group vs 52 [14%] of patients in the sorafenib group), aspartate aminotransferase increase (22 [6%] vs 13 [4%]), and hypertension (0 vs 26 [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 43 (12%) patients receiving nivolumab and 39 (11%) patients receiving sorafenib. Four deaths in the nivolumab group and one death in the sorafenib group were assessed as treatment related.
Interpretation: First-line nivolumab treatment did not significantly improve overall survival compared with sorafenib, but clinical activity and a favourable safety profile were observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, nivolumab might be considered a therapeutic option for patients in whom tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs are contraindicated or have substantial risks