5 research outputs found

    Knockdown of NRP2 expression causes increased mRNA expression of NRP1, while simultaneous knockdown of both NRPs has no effect on the total area of SC clusters.

    No full text
    <p>SCs were transfected with the siNRP1 pool, the siNRP2 pool or a combination of both. (A) After 5 days the measured NRP1 mRNA expression levels were 32, 178, and 47% respectively when compared to the siGlo condition. This indicates NRP1 mRNA upregulation after knockdown of NRP2. mRNA expression levels of NRP2 after knockdown with the siNRP1 pool, the siNRP2 pool or a combination of both were 88, 36 and 42% of endogenous levels respectively. The presented values are averages of 4 independent SC transfections (p<0.05). (B) A simultaneous transfection with the siNRP1 and siNRP2 pool has no effect on the total area of SC clusters. There is a small but significant decrease in the number of clusters (78%; p<0.001) and a moderate increase in cluster size (130%; p<0.05). The presented values are averages of 3 independent experiments (P<0.05). Error bars indicate the SEM.</p

    Schwann cells form clusters when confronted with meningeal cells and these cells express neuropilins and class-3 semaphorins.

    No full text
    <p>(A) SCs labeled with S100 (red) form a clear border and form cluster-like aggregates when confronted with MCs (blue nuclei without cellular staining). (B) NRP1 and NRP2 are expressed in SCs and in MCs. SCs express 8 fold more NRP2 than NRP1. MCs express ∼2 fold more NRP2 than NRP1. MCs express 10 fold more NRP1 and almost 3 fold more NRP2 than SCs. Scalebar = 250 µm (C) endogenous Sema3A–F expression of SCs and MCs. SCs express predominantly Sema3B, C and E. MC express predominantly Sema3C and at 10 fold lower levels Sema3A, E and F. These results represent the average mRNA levels of 3 independent SC and MC cultures. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).</p

    Validation of NRP1 and NRP2 knockdown effects on SC cluster formation.

    No full text
    <p>(A) mRNA levels of NRP1 were decreased in SCs after transfection with the siRNA pool or either of the 4 single siRNAs. Expression levels were ranging from 9 to 66% of endogenous expression measured in the siGlo condition. Knockdown was significant for all conditions (p<0.001) except for siNRP1 single 1 (p<0.12). The value presented for the siNRP1 pool is the result of 4 different experiments. The values for the siNRP1 singles are the result of 1 experiment with 4 technical replicates. The siGlo condition presented in the graph is the control for the single siRNA conditions. (B) Three single siRNAs confirm the significant decrease in the number of clusters which is observed with the siNRP1 pool (p<0.01). (C) Two of the single siRNAs confirm the increase of cluster size observed with the siNRP1 pool (p<0.001). All values are normalized to the siGlo condition. The presented values represent the average of 3 separate experiments. The differential effects of siNRP1 single 2 and 3 may be the result of off-target effects (D) mRNA levels of NRP2 were decreased in SCs after transfection with the siRNA pool or either of the 4 single siRNAs. Expression levels were ranging from 18 to 64% of endogenous expression measured in the siGlo condition. Knockdown was significant for all conditions (p<0.05). The value presented for the siNRP2 pool is the result of 4 different experiments. The values for the siNRP1 singles are the result of 1 experiment with 4 technical replicates. The siGlo condition presented in the graph is the control for the single siRNA conditions. (E) All 4 single siRNAs confirm the significant decrease in the number of clusters which is observed with the siNRP2 pool (p<0.01). The presented values represent the average of 3 separate experiments. Error bars indicate the SEM.</p

    Knockdown of NRP1 increases while knockdown of NRP2 decreases formation of Schwann cell clusters.

    No full text
    <p>(A–C) Representative SC clusters when co-cultured with MCs for 5 days after a transfection with siGlo, siNRP1 pool or siNRP2 pool respectively. SCs are shown in grey (S100 labeling). MCs are not labeled. Valid cell clusters were outlined with a blue line. Invalid clusters were outlined with an orange line. Scalebar = 250 µm. (D) The total area of SC clusters per well after knockdown of NRP1 or NRP2. There was a significant increase in total area of SC clusters after knockdown of NRP1 (137%) while in contrast, there was a strong decrease of total area of SC clusters after knockdown of NRP2 (54%). (E) The number of valid clusters per well significantly decreases to 77% after knockdown of NRP1 and 53% after knockdown of NRP2. (F) Cluster size after knockdown of NRP1 increases strongly to 183% (p<0.001) when compared to the siGlo condition, while the average SC cluster size after knockdown of NRP2 does not change. Values are normalized to the siGlo condition and represent the averages of all wells of 6 separate experiments. Error bars indicate the SEM.</p

    Concerted changes in transcripts in the prefrontal cortex precede neuropathology in Alzheimer's disease

    No full text
    Using the Braak staging for neurofibrillary changes as an objective indicator of the progression of Alzheimer's disease, we have performed a systematic search for global gene expression changes in the prefrontal cortex during the course of Alzheimer's disease. In the prefrontal cortex, senile plaques and neurofibrillary changes start to appear around Braak stage III, allowing for the detection of changes in gene expression before, during and after the onset of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Two distinct patterns of tightly co-regulated groups of genes were observed: (i) an increase in expression in early Braak stages, followed by a decline in expression in later stages (the UPDOWN clusters; containing 865 genes) and (ii) a decrease in expression in early Braak stages, followed by an increase in expression in later stages (the DOWNUP clusters; containing 983 genes). The most profound changes in gene expression were detected between Braak stages II and III, just before or at the onset of plaque pathology and neurofibrillary changes in the prefrontal cortex. We also observed an increase in intracellular beta amyloid staining from Braak stages I to III and a clear decrease in Braak stages IV to VI. These data suggest a link between specific gene expression clusters and Alzheimer's disease-associated neuropathology in the prefrontal cortex. Gene ontology over-representation and functional gene network analyses indicate an increase in synaptic activity and changes in plasticity during the very early pre-symptomatic stage of the disease. In later Braak stages, the decreased expression of these genes suggests a reduction in synaptic activity that coincides with the appearance of plaque pathology and neurofibrillary changes and the clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. The interaction of the ApoE genotype with the expression levels of the genes in the UPDOWN and DOWNUP clusters demonstrates that the accelerating role of ApoE-ε4 in the progression of Alzheimer's disease is reflected in the temporal changes in gene expression presented here. Since the UPDOWN cluster contains several genes involved in amyloid precursor protein processing and beta amyloid clearance that increase in expression in parallel with increased intracellular beta amyloid load, just before the onset of plaque pathology in the prefrontal cortex, we hypothesize that the temporally orchestrated increase in genes involved in synaptic activity represents a coping mechanism against increased soluble beta amyloid levels. As these gene expression changes occur before the appearance of Alzheimer's disease-associated neuropathology, they provide an excellent starting point for the identification of new targets for the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at the prevention of Alzheimer's diseas
    corecore