The Moonlight Sonata

Non-fiction by Judy Winslo

Fuse-holder concept expedites electronic component changes

Mounting circuit components in fuse holders facilitates component changing and extends component life with an estimated fifty percent saving of breadboard test time. Glass sleeves of the fuse holders allow easy component identification

Coded photographic proof paper could serve as convenient densitometer

Standard print-out proofing paper, preprinted with an identifying code, serves as convenient densitometer. Exposure to light darkens the paper and gives a measure of the density of the resultant photographic image or the total amount of exposure sustained by the paper

Design of Geometric Molecular Bonds

An example of a nonspecific molecular bond is the affinity of any positive charge for any negative charge (like-unlike), or of nonpolar material for itself when in aqueous solution (like-like). This contrasts specific bonds such as the affinity of the DNA base A for T, but not for C, G, or another A. Recent experimental breakthroughs in DNA nanotechnology demonstrate that a particular nonspecific like-like bond ("blunt-end DNA stacking" that occurs between the ends of any pair of DNA double-helices) can be used to create specific "macrobonds" by careful geometric arrangement of many nonspecific blunt ends, motivating the need for sets of macrobonds that are orthogonal: two macrobonds not intended to bind should have relatively low binding strength, even when misaligned. To address this need, we introduce geometric orthogonal codes that abstractly model the engineered DNA macrobonds as two-dimensional binary codewords. While motivated by completely different applications, geometric orthogonal codes share similar features to the optical orthogonal codes studied by Chung, Salehi, and Wei. The main technical difference is the importance of 2D geometry in defining codeword orthogonality.Comment: Accepted to appear in IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological, and Multi-Scale Communication

Diversity and Arbitrage in a Regulatory Breakup Model

In 1999 Robert Fernholz observed an inconsistency between the normative assumption of existence of an equivalent martingale measure (EMM) and the empirical reality of diversity in equity markets. We explore a method of imposing diversity on market models by a type of antitrust regulation that is compatible with EMMs. The regulatory procedure breaks up companies that become too large, while holding the total number of companies constant by imposing a simultaneous merge of other companies. The regulatory events are assumed to have no impact on portfolio values. As an example, regulation is imposed on a market model in which diversity is maintained via a log-pole in the drift of the largest company. The result is the removal of arbitrage opportunities from this market while maintaining the market's diversity.Comment: 21 page