The scatter plot shows the correlation between individual scores on the BIS scale and the difference scores for the Gratton effects.

<p>The scatter plot shows the correlation between individual scores on the BIS scale and the difference scores for the Gratton effects.</p

The reaction times for each punishment-sensitive group separately.

<p>The figure demonstrates how punishment helps in adapting to conflict, for low punishment-sensitive people, while people high in punishment sensitivity slow down after punishment. The error bars are ± 1 standard error.</p

Errors Disrupt Subsequent Early Attentional Processes - Fig 4

<p>(a) Laplacian transformed grand average ERP waveforms at Pz, measured between 400 and 600 ms, as a function of previous accuracy in the flanker task and frequency, separately for interval condition. (b) Average P3 amplitudes (in μV/cm²) for frequent and infrequent stimuli in both conditions are shown. (c) Average amplitude (in μV/cm²) of the P3, for post-correct and post-error trials in both conditions.</p

Average reaction time (in millisecondes) and accuracy (in percentages) in trials with frequent and infrequent stimuli following correct and erroneous trials in the flanker task.

<p>Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals around the means.</p