The Iowa Homemaker vol.28, no.1

Housemothers Enjoy Personal Ties, Janet Sutherland, page 2 Your Hope Chest Plans, Jo Ann Breckenridge, page 3 Select Your Electives Now, Barbara Parson, page 4 With Spring – Sport’s The Thing, Barbara Allen, page 5 You Can Make Packing Fun, Patricia Close, page 7 Vicky Boasts – Bring On The Rain, Katherine Williams, page 8 Wee Listeners Join Radio Fans, Lee Ann Smiley, page 10 Zipper History Has Ups and Downs, Margaret Leveson, page 12 Simple Corsages That You Can Make, Emogene Olson, page 15 Keeping Up with Today, Mary West, page 1

Counseling versus antidepressant therapy for the treatment of mild to moderate depression in primary care: economic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of generic psychological therapy (counseling) with routinely prescribed antidepressant drugs in a naturalistic general practice setting for a follow-up period of 12 months. METHODS: Economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial with patient preference arm. Comparison of depression-related health service costs at 12 months. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bootstrapped trial data using net monetary benefits and acceptability curves. RESULTS: No significant difference between the mean observed costs of patients randomized to antidepressants or to counseling (342 pounds sterling vs 302 pounds sterling , p = .56 [t test]). If decision makers are not willing to pay more for additional benefits (value placed on extra patient with good outcome, denoted by K, is zero), then we find little difference between the treatment modalities in terms of cost-effectiveness. If decision makers do place value on additional benefit (K > 0 pounds sterling), then the antidepressant group becomes more likely to be cost-effective. This likelihood is in excess of 90% where decision makers are prepared to pay an additional 2,000 pounds sterling or more per additional patient with a good global outcome. The mean values for incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) from antidepressants are substantial for higher values of K (INMB = 406 pounds sterling when K = 2,500 pounds sterling). CONCLUSION: For a small proportion of patients, the counseling intervention (as specified in this trial) is a dominant cost-effective strategy. For a larger proportion of patients, the antidepressant intervention (as specified in this trial) is the dominant cost-effective strategy. For the remaining group of patients, cost-effectiveness depends on the value of K. Since we cannot observe K, acceptability curves are a useful way to inform decision makers

Lynn Chamber Music Competition 2016

Judges Joan Thomson Kretschmer Drew West Steven Thomas Winners (New York Prize) Impromptu String Quartet: Katherine Baloff (violin), David Brill (violin), Camille Ripple (viola), and Georgiy Khokhlov (cello) Winners Concert on May 2, 2017 at Kosciuszko Foundation Winners (Miami Prize) Lyre Trio: Alla Solokoletova (flute), Kayla Williams (viola), and Yana Lyashko (harp)https://spiral.lynn.edu/conservatory_chamber-music-competition/1001/thumbnail.jp

Household Food Security Data Consensus Statement

Food insecurity in Australia is increasing, but a lack of consistent, regular monitoring and reporting of food insecurity using comprehensive, validated tools is limiting timely intervention. Regular monitoring is urgently needed from state/ territory and federal governments. Reporting of the prevalence of household food security needs to reflect levels of severity (marginal, moderate and severe food insecurity) in each state and territory across Australia. Commonly used short tools comprising one or two questions are inadequate for assessing the true prevalence of food insecurity and result in serious underestimation. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) should be adopted across settings to provide the most valid, internationally comparable data on food insecurity for both adults and children

The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) survey discloses persistent moderate to high-level symptoms in cancer survivors

cancer survivorship care; patient reported outcomeshttps://openworks.mdanderson.org/acif24/1006/thumbnail.jp

Speech Communication

Contains research objectives and summary of research on four research projects.National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 RO1 NS04332-14)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 T32 NS07040-02)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 NS00796-01)National Institutes of Health (Grant 1 ROI NS13028-01)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 T3Z NS07040-02)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 MH58258-02)U. S. Army- Maryland Procurement Office (Contract MDA904-76-C-0331

Speech Communication

Contains research objectives and summary of research on six research projects and reports on three research projects.National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 RO1 NS04332-13)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 MH5825-01)National Institutes of Health (Grant 1 T32 NS07040-01)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 NS007960)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 HD019120)National Institutes of Health (Fellowship 1 F22 HD01919-01)U. S. Army (Contract DAAB03-75-C-0489)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 RO1 NS04332-12

Determination of intrinsic switching field distributions in perpendicular recording media: numerical study of the ΔH(M,ΔM)\Delta H(M, \Delta M) method

We present a numerical study of the $\Delta H(M,\Delta M)$ method and its ability to accurately determine intrinsic switching field distributions in interacting granular magnetic materials such as perpendicular recording media. In particular, we study how this methodology fails for large ferromagnetic inter-granular interactions, at which point the associated strongly correlated magnetization reversal cannot be properly represented by the mean-field approximation, upon which the $\Delta H(M,\Delta M)$ method is based. In this study, we use a 2-dimensional array of symmetric hysterons that have an intrinsic switching field distribution of standard deviation $\sigma$ and ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interactions $J$. We find the $\Delta H(M,\Delta M)$ method to be very accurate for small $J/\sigma$ values, while substantial errors develop once the effective exchange field becomes comparable with $\sigma$, corroborating earlier results from micromagnetic simulations. We furthermore demonstrate that this failure is correlated with deviations from data set redundancy, which is a key property of the mean-field approximation. Thus, the $\Delta H(M,\Delta M)$ method fails in a well defined and quantifiable manner that can be easily assessed from the data sets alone.Comment: 13 pages, 9 figure