9 research outputs found
Impact of extraction parameters and their optimization on the nutraceuticals and antioxidant properties of aqueous extract mulberry leaf
An investigation into the efficient use of water as a solvent and the influence of extraction temperature, extraction time, water to leaf powder ratio, particle size, and extraction cycle on the nutraceutical and antioxidant profile of aqueous mulberry leaf extract were conducted using a single-factor experiment approach. All the assessed extracting parameters showed a significant effect on the nutraceutical compounds and antioxidant properties. The optimum extraction conditions were as follows: extraction temperature of 70°C, extraction time of 40 min, water to leaf powder ratio of 40:1 ml/g, particle size of 25 µm, and two extraction cycles. Based on these optimal conditions, chlorogenic acid (62.10 mg/g), caffeic acid (32.21 mg/g), kaempferol-7-O-glucoside (19.30 mg/g), quercetin-3-rutinose (15.69 mg/g), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (32.38 mg/g), kaempferol-3-(6-rhamnosylglucoside) (42.52 mg/g), quercetin-3-(6-malonylglucoside) (65.19 mg/g), kaempferol-3-glucoside (66.27 mg/g), kaempferol-3-(6-malonylglucoside) (50.18 mg/g), 1-deoxynojirimycin (15.58 mg/g), and gamma-aminobutyric acid (5.05 mg/g) were obtained. The optimal aqueous extract had high antioxidant properties of 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (39.98 mM/g), cupric ion reducing capacity (58.93 mM/g), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (101.33 mM/g), and ferric reducing antioxidant power capacity (233.77 mM/g) of dried mulberry leaf extract
Quality evaluation of orange-fleshed sweet potato-pineapple blended jam
This research aimed to develop a jam using orange-fleshed sweet potato puree (OFSPP) and pineapple pulp (PP) and to assess nutritional, gelling, sensory, and microbiological qualities. Four jam formulations of OFSPP: PP (70%:30, 50%:50%, and 30%:70) and 100% PP were developed and evaluated. Increasing the level of OFSPP resulted in a significant (P<0.05) decrease in moisture content (34.39–23.70%), but increased the fat (0.16–0.18%), ash (0.35–0.40%), protein (0.93–1.57%), and carbohydrates (61.70–67.69%) content. The concentration of β–carotene decreased with a reducing OFSPP fraction (P<0.05). After 12 weeks of storage, the 50% OFSPP and 50% pineapple jam had a total plate count of 4.50 CFU/g, although coliform and mould were not present in all the processed jam samples. The mixed jam with 50% OFSPP: 50% PP had a higher sensory acceptance. These results indicate that food processors could develop OFSP-PP jams as a β–carotene enriched functional food
Effect of pulsed light treatment on the phytochemical, volatile, and sensorial attributes of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice
Lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice (LFMJ) was subjected to pulsed light (PL) treatment at exposure time of 2, 4, and 8 s at high insensitive pulses of 14.0 J/cm2. The effect of PL treatment on the microbial inactivation, physicochemical, phytochemical, volatile, and sensory characteristics of LFMJ was evaluated. It was found that the PL was able to reduce the microbial load to acceptable levels (1.02 ± 0.04 log10 cfu/mL) with no significant impact on the physicochemical properties of LFMJ. It was also observed that the PL treatment caused a slight decrease in anthocyanin concentration at 8 s exposure time. The color difference (∆E) of the juice treated for 2 and 4 s fell below the slightly noticeable range 0.5<ΔE<1.5 while ∆E values for the 8 s (0.55 ± 0.02) and the thermal (0.50 ± 0.02) treated samples were slightly noticeable. The volatile profile and odor activity values were positively affected by increasing the exposure time. The results depict that, under the present experimental conditions, the application of the PL resulted in a fermented juice with superior quality attributes as compared to the thermal treated juice
Impact of ultrasonication and pulsed light treatments on phenolics concentration and antioxidant activities of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice
Impact of extraction parameters and their optimization on the nutraceuticals and antioxidant properties of aqueous extract mulberry leaf
Effect of pulsed light treatment on the phytochemical, volatile, and sensorial attributes of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice
Ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction (UAEE) of phytochemical compounds from mulberry (Morus nigra) must and optimization study using response surface methodology
Process Analysis of Mulberry (Morus alba) Leaf Extract Encapsulation: Effects of Spray Drying Conditions on Bioactive Encapsulated Powder Quality
Recommended from our members
Ofranergene Obadenovec (Ofra-Vec, VB-111) With Weekly Paclitaxel for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial (OVAL Study/GOG 3018)
PURPOSE To evaluate the addition of ofranergene obadenovec (ofra-vec, VB-111), a novel gene-based anticancer targeted therapy, to once a week paclitaxel in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). METHODS This placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03398655 ) randomly assigned patients with PROC 1:1 to receive intravenous ofra-vec every 8 weeks with once a week IV paclitaxel or placebo with paclitaxel until disease progression. The dual primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review. RESULTS Between December 2017 and March 2022, 409 patients were randomly assigned. The median PFS was 5.29 months in the ofra-vec arm and 5.36 months in the control arm, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (CI, 0.83 to 1.29; P = .7823). The median OS with ofra-vec was 13.37 months versus 13.14 months, HR 0.97 (CI, 0.75 to 1.27; P = .8440). Objective response rates (ORRs) per RECIST 1.1 were similar in both arms: 28.9% with ofra-vec versus 29.6% with control. In both treatment arms, response to CA-125 was a substantial prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. In the ofra-vec arm, the HR in CA-125 responders compared with that in nonresponders for PFS was 0.2428 (CI, 0.1642 to 0.3588), and for OS, the HR was 0.3343 (CI, 0.2134 to 0.5238). Safety profile was characterized by common transient flu–like symptoms such as fever and chills. CONCLUSION The addition of ofra-vec to paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS. The PFS and ORR in the control arm exceeded the results that were anticipated on the basis of the AURELIA chemotherapy control arm. CA-125 response was a substantial prognostic biomarker for PFS and OS in patients with PROC treated with paclitaxel