15 research outputs found
VLDL subclasses particle concentrations (nmol/L) in response to 12 weeks intervention with refined, wheat- or wheat + oats – based diets<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>Values are presented as mean (SEM) or (SED) for differences between week 16 and week 4.</p>2<p>Differences at baseline between groups were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA on log-transformed values.</p>3<p>Differences in concentration change from baseline between the dietary intervention groups were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA.</p>4<p>Represents differences calculated as mean concentration at week 16 – mean concentration at week 4.</p
HDL subclasses particle concentration (nmol/L) in response to 12 weeks intervention with refined, wheat- or wheat + oats – based diets<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>Values are presented as mean (SEM) or (SED) for differences between week 16 and week 4.</p>2<p>Differences at baseline between groups were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA on log-transformed values.</p>3<p>Differences in concentration change from baseline between the dietary intervention groups were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA on log-transformed values.</p>4<p>Represents differences calculated as mean concentration at week 16 – mean concentration at week 4.</p
Participant characteristics at baseline.<sup>1</sup>
1<p>Results are mean (SD), TAG = triglycerides.</p>2<p>Differences between groups (All) were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA. There was no significant diet-gender interaction.</p>3<p>Differences between groups for men were assessed by using one-factor ANOVA.</p>4<p>Differences between groups for women were assessed by using one-factor ANOVA.</p>5<p>Values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (Bonferroni post hoc test).</p>6<p>% change from baseline after 12 weeks intervention.</p
Pearson partial correlation.
<p>Partial correlations at baseline (n = 206) were corrected for BMI, age and energy intake and calculated from log transformed values.</p>a<p>P<0.05, <sup>b</sup>P<0.01, <sup>c</sup>p<0.001 (2-tailed).</p>1<p>particle size (nM).</p>2<p>Particle concentration (nmol/L).</p
RIFLE AKI patients detected by the NHS England AKI algorithm by clinical location.
<p>The greatest proportion of RIFLE AKI patients identified by the NHS England algorithm was in intensive care (95.5%) and the renal unit (94.6%).</p
Study population.
<p>AKI = acute kidney injury, CHI = community health index, CKD = chronic kidney disease, RIFLE = risk injury failure loss end stage kidney disease, RRT = renal replacement therapy.</p
Nephrologist clinical diagnosis of patients who received an AKI alert.
<p>Nephrologist clinical diagnosis of patients who received an AKI alert.</p
Lipoprotein size (nm) in response to 12 weeks intervention with refined, wheat- or wheat + oats – based diets<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>Values are mean (SEM).</p>2<p>Differences at baseline between groups were assessed by using two-factor ANOVA on log-transformed values.</p>3<p>Differences in size change from baseline between the dietary intervention groups were assessed by using two factor ANOVA on log transformed values.</p>4<p>Values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (Bonferroni post hoc test).</p>5<p>Represents differences calculated as mean concentration at week 16 – mean concentration at week 4.</p
RIFLE AKI patients detected by the NHS England AKI algorithm by AKI cause.
<p>Patients could have more than one cause of AKI recorded. The algorithm identified >85% of RIFLE AKI patients across all aetiologies, although it performed least well when the cause of AKI was unknown (85.1%).</p