Estimating Population Abundance with a Mixture of Physical Capture and PIT Tag Antenna Detection Data

The inclusion of passive interrogation antenna (PIA) detection data has promise to increase precision of population abundance estimates (Nˆ ). However, encounter probabilities are often higher for PIAs than for physical capture. If the difference is not accounted for, Nˆ may be biased. Using simulations, we estimated the magnitude of bias resulting from mixed capture and detection probabilities and evaluated potential solutions for removing the bias for closed capture models. Mixing physical capture and PIA detections (pdet) resulted in negative biases in Nˆ . However, using an individual covariate to model differences removed bias and improved precision. From a case study of fish making spawning migrations across a stream-wide PIA (pdet ≤ 0.9), the coefficient of variation (CV) of Nˆ declined 39%–82% when PIA data were included, and there was a dramatic reduction in time to detect a significant change in Nˆ . For a second case study, with modest pdet (≤0.2) using smaller PIAs, CV (Nˆ ) declined 4%–18%. Our method is applicable for estimating abundance for any situation where data are collected with methods having different capture–detection probabilities

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Shoshone Sculpin <i>Cottus greenei</i> in the Hagerman Valley of South-Central Idaho

The Shoshone sculpin Cottus greenei is a micro-endemic species and an extreme habitat specialist, geographically restricted to the spring outlets that flow from the Snake River Plain Aquifer into the Snake River within the Hagerman Valley of south central Idaho. Although previous studies documented the range of the species and its relative abundance, no studies have assessed genetic diversity and structure. We sampled 20 populations from throughout the species range and genotyped 1311 with a panel of 12 microsatellite loci. Results indicate very high levels of genetic differentiation among most populations (average pairwise FST = 0.24), indicating limited gene flow. Preservation of the genetic diversity of this species will require the protection and preservation of multiple isolated populations