4 research outputs found

    Cambridge hybrid closed-loop system in very young children with type 1 diabetes reduces caregivers’ fear of hypoglycemia and improves their well-being

    Get PDF
    Objective To evaluate the impact of CamAPS FX hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery (HCL) in very young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on caregivers’ well-being, fear of hypoglycemia and sleepiness. Research Design Multinational, open label, randomized crossover study. Children (1-7years) with T1D received treatment for two 4-month periods in random order, comparing HCL with sensor augmented pump (SAP) (control). At baseline and after each treatment period, caregivers were invited to complete WHO-5, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Results Caregivers of 74 children (mean±SD: age 5±2 years; 42% female, baseline HbA1c 7.3±0.7%) participated. Results revealed significantly lower scores for hypoglycemia fear (p<.001) and higher for well-being (p<.001) after HCL treatment. A trend towards a reduction in sleepiness score was observed (p=0.09). Conclusion Our results suggest a better well-being and less hypoglycemia fear in caregivers of very young children with T1D on CamAPS FX HCL

    Perioperative Fully Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE Perioperative management of glucose levels remains challenging. We aimed to assess whether fully closed-loop subcutaneous insulin delivery would improve glycemic control compared with standard insulin therapy in insulin-requiring patients undergoing elective surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients with diabetes (other than type 1) undergoing elective surgery were recruited from various surgical units and randomly assigned using a minimization schedule (stratified by HbA1c and daily insulin dose) to fully closed-loop insulin delivery with fast-acting insulin aspart (closed-loop group) or standard insulin therapy ac-cording to local clinical practice (control group). Study treatment was adminis-tered from hospital admission to discharge (for a maximum of 20 days). The primary end point was the proportion of time with sensor glucose in the target range (5.6–10.0 mmol/L). RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and assigned to the closed-loop (n 5 23) or the control (n 5 22) group. One patient (closed-loop group) withdrew from the study before surgery and was not analyzed. Participants underwent abdominal (57%), vascular (23%), orthopedic (9%), neuro (9%), or thoracic (2%) surgery. The mean proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range was 76.7 ± 10.1% in the closed-loop and 54.7 ± 20.8% in the control group (mean difference 22.0 percentage points [95% CI 11.9; 32.0%]; P &lt; 0.001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia (&lt;3.0 mmol/L) or hyperglycemia with ketonemia or any study-related adverse events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS In the context of mixed elective surgery, the use of fully closed-loop subcutaneous insulin delivery improves glucose control without a higher risk of hypoglycemia. © 2022 by the American Diabetes Association.

    Automated Insulin Delivery in Women with Pregnancy Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy has shown promise for management of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy; however, its efficacy is unclear. METHODS In this multicenter, controlled trial, we randomly assigned pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and a glycated hemoglobin level of at least 6.5% at nine sites in the United Kingdom to receive standard insulin therapy or hybrid closed-loop therapy, with both groups using continuous glucose monitoring. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in the pregnancy-specific target glucose range (63 to 140 mg per deciliter [3.5 to 7.8 mmol per liter]) as measured by continuous glucose monitoring from 16 weeks’ gestation until delivery. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Key secondary outcomes were the percentage of time spent in a hyperglycemic state (glucose level >140 mg per deciliter), overnight time in the target range, the glycated hemoglobin level, and safety events. RESULTS A total of 124 participants with a mean (±SD) age of 31.1±5.3 years and a mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level of 7.7±1.2% underwent randomization. The mean percentage of time that the maternal glucose level was in the target range was 68.2±10.5% in the closed-loop group and 55.6±12.5% in the standard-care group (mean adjusted difference, 10.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to 14.0; P<0.001). Results for the secondary outcomes were consistent with those of the primary outcome; participants in the closed-loop group spent less time in a hyperglycemic state than those in the standard-care group (difference, −10.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −13.8 to −6.6); had more overnight time in the target range (difference, 12.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.3 to 16.2), and had lower glycated hemoglobin levels (difference, −0.31 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.50 to −0.12). Little time was spent in a hypoglycemic state. No unanticipated safety problems associated with the use of closed-loop therapy during pregnancy occurred (6 instances of severe hypoglycemia, vs. 5 in the standard-care group; 1 instance of diabetic ketoacidosis in each group; and 12 device-related adverse events in the closed-loop group, 7 related to closed-loop therapy). CONCLUSIONS Hybrid closed-loop therapy significantly improved maternal glycemic control during pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes. (Funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Program; AiDAPT ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN56898625. opens in new tab.
    corecore