The effect of donor body mass index on graft function in liver transplantation: A systematic review

The impact of donor body mass index (BMI) on graft function outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence investigating the effect of donor BMI on outcomes in patients undergoing LT. A systematic review was performed to evaluate relevant outcomes such as the availability of data on donor BMI as well as graft and patient survival after LT. Screening of 901 articles resulted in 11 observational studies for data extraction. In adult deceased donor after brain death and living donor LT, donor BMI was not associated with graft and patient survival. However, high donor BMI was associated with a higher chance of macrosteatosis besides a significantly higher incidence of declined livers. In pediatric LT, severe obesity in adult donors with BMI ≥35 was associated with graft loss and mortality, whereas obesity in pediatric donors was not associated with graft loss and mortality. Accordingly, donor BMI is not associated with long-term outcomes in adult patients undergoing LT. However, further research should be conducted to identify the effect of donor BMI on outcomes in LT

Nationwide evaluation of pancreatic cancer networks ten years after the centralization of pancreatic surgery

Background: Due to centralization of pancreatic surgery, patients with pancreatic cancer are treated in pancreatic cancer networks, composed of referring hospitals (Spokes) and an expert center (Hub). This study aimed to investigate I) how pancreatic cancer networks are organized and II) evaluated by involved clinicians.Methods: Two online surveys were sent out between January-May 2022. Part I was sent out to the surgical network directors of all hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG). Part II was sent out to all involved clinicians in the Hubs-and-Spokes networks. Results: There was a large variety between the 15 networks concerning number of affiliated Spokes (1-7), annual pancreatoduodenectomies (20-129), and use of a service level agreement (SLA) (40%). More Spoke clinicians considered the Spoke the best location for diagnostic workup (74% vs 36%, P < 0.001). Only 30% of Spoke clinicians attended the Hubs multidisciplinary team meeting frequently. More Hub clinicians thought that exchange of patient information should be improved (37% vs 51%, P = 0.005).Conclusion: A large variety in Dutch pancreatic cancer networks was observed concerning number of affiliated Spokes, use of SLAs, and logistic aspects of network care. Improvement of network care concern agreements on diagnostic workup, use of SLA, Spoke participation in the MDT, and patient information exchange.Surgical oncolog

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of benign liver tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis

Background: Data on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) of benign liver tumour (BLT) are scarce. This study aimed to provide a nationwide overview of postoperative outcomes after LLR and OLR of BLT. Methods: This was a nationwide retrospective study including all patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma, haemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare 30-day overall and major morbidity and 30-day mortality after OLR and LLR. Results: In total, 415 patients underwent BLT resection of whom 230 (55.4%) underwent LLR. PSM for OLR and LLR resulted in 250 matched patients. Median (IQR) length of stay was shorter after LLR than OLR (4 versus 6 days, 5.0-8.0, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day overall morbidity was lower after LLR than OLR (12.0% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.043). LLR was associated with reduced 30-day overall morbidity in multivariable analysis (aOR:0.46, CI:0.22-0.95, p = 0.043). Both 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were not different. Conclusions: LLR for BLT is associated with shorter hospital stay and reduced overall morbidity and is preferred if technically feasible.Transplant surger

Implementation and outcome of robotic liver surgery in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis

Objective:To determine the nationwide implementation and surgical outcome of minor and major robotic liver surgery (RLS) and assess the first phase of implementation of RLS during the learning curve. Background:RLS may be a valuable alternative to laparoscopic liver surgery. Nationwide population-based studies with data on implementation and outcome of RLS are lacking. Methods:Multicenter retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent RLS for all indications in 9 Dutch centers (August 2014-March 2021). Data on all liver resections were obtained from the mandatory nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit (DHBA) including data from all 27 centers for liver surgery in the Netherlands. Outcomes were stratified for minor, technically major, and anatomically major RLS. Learning curve effect was assessed using cumulative sum analysis for blood loss. Results:Of 9437 liver resections, 400 were RLS (4.2%) procedures including 207 minor (52.2%), 141 technically major (35.3%), and 52 anatomically major (13%). The nationwide use of RLS increased from 0.2% in 2014 to 11.9% in 2020. The proportion of RLS among all minimally invasive liver resections increased from 2% to 28%. Median blood loss was 150 mL (interquartile range 50-350 mL] and the conversion rate 6.3% (n=25). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade >= III complications was 7.0% (n=27), median length of hospital stay 4 days (interquartile range 2-5) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality 0.8% (n=3). The R0 resection rate was 83.2% (n=263). Cumulative sum analysis for blood loss found a learning curve of at least 33 major RLS procedures. Conclusions:The nationwide use of RLS in the Netherlands has increased rapidly with currently one-tenth of all liver resections and one-fourth of all minimally invasive liver resections being performed robotically. Although surgical outcomes of RLS in selected patient seem favorable, future prospective studies should determine its added value.Surgical oncolog

The feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves in 635 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies following a multicenter training program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants"

Objective: To assess the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in "second-generation" RPD centers following a multicenter training program adhering to the IDEAL framework.Background: The long learning curves for RPD reported from "pioneering" expert centers may discourage centers interested in starting an RPD program. However, the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves may be shorter in "second-generation" centers that participated in dedicated RPD training programs, although data are lacking. We report on the learning curves for RPD in "second-generation" centers trained in a dedicated nationwide program.Methods: Post hoc analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing RPD in 7 centers that participated in the LAELAPS-3 training program, each with a minimum annual volume of 50 pancreatoduodenectomies, using the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (March 2016-December 2021). Cumulative sum analysis determined cutoffs for the 3 learning curves: operative time for the feasibility (1) risk-adjusted major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade >= III) for the proficiency, (2) and textbook outcome for the mastery, (3) learning curve. Outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared for the proficiency and mastery learning curves. A survey was used to assess changes in practice and the most valued "lessons learned."Results: Overall, 635 RPD were performed by 17 trained surgeons, with a conversion rate of 6.6% (n=42). The median annual volume of RPD per center was 22.56.8. From 2016 to 2021, the nationwide annual use of RPD increased from 0% to 23% whereas the use of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy decreased from 15% to 0%. The rate of major complications was 36.9% (n=234), surgical site infection 6.3% (n=40), postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) 26.9% (n=171), and 30-day/in-hospital mortality 3.5% (n=22). Cutoffs for the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves were reached at 15, 62, and 84 RPD. Major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly before and after the cutoffs for the proficiency and mastery learning curves. Previous experience in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy shortened the feasibility (-12 RPDs, -44%), proficiency (-32 RPDs, -34%), and mastery phase learning curve (-34 RPDs, -23%), but did not improve clinical outcome.Conclusions: The feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves for RPD at 15, 62, and 84 procedures in "second-generation" centers after a multicenter training program were considerably shorter than previously reported from "pioneering" expert centers. The learning curve cutoffs and prior laparoscopic experience did not impact major morbidity and mortality. These findings demonstrate the safety and value of a nationwide training program for RPD in centers with sufficient volume.Surgical oncolog

The Genetics and Molecular Alterations of Pancreatic Cancer

The prospect that pancreatic cancer will be the second most common cause of cancer death by 2030 is worrisome. Considering that the approximate 6% overall 5-year survival has not merely changed in the past decades illustrates the need to revert the bleak prognosis. Centralization of surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy or Whipple procedure) in the Netherlands resulted in decreased in-hospital mortality and lower in-hospital mortality for elderly patients in high-volume centers. Other initiatives include the development of reliable diagnostics to detect pancreatic cancer at an early stage (i.e. as precursor). Even though pancreatic cancer has become genetically one of the best-characterized diseases, translational efforts in the past decades have not yet led to offer patients a better prognosis. As such, the aim should be to further utilize current genetic and molecular characteristics of precursors to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Herein, whole-exome sequencing of PDAC revealed that long-term survival (≥10 years) is unlikely to be mediated by commonly mutated genes (KRAS, P16/CDKN2A, TP53, SMAD4/DPC4 amongst others). For acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the pancreas, the LKB1 gene was not shown to be commonly mutated and molecular alterations in ACCs are different than those in PDAC. Whole-exome sequencing of PanNETs revealed the main genetic pathways, such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, altered and identified hitherto unknown tumor suppressor genes in ATRX (α thallasemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked) and DAXX (death domain-associated protein). Clinicopathologic correlates were found in PanNETs harboring MEN1 and ATRX or DAXX mutations since these tumors were associated with better prognosis. Moreover, the assessment of telomere status in PanNETs harboring ATRX or DAXX mutations showed a perfect correlation between altered ATRX or DAXX expression and the presence of the telomerase-independent telomere maintenance mechanism termed alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). Finally, the timing of altered ATRX and DAXX expression was studied in combination with the occurrence of the ALT-phenotype in PanNETs and precursors (i.e. microadenomas) hereto. This revealed loss of ATRX and DAXX expression and ALT occurred only in larger PanNETs thus suggesting that these changes are late events in PanNET tumorigenesis. The applicability of genetic and molecular alterations might guide further therapeutic options even though with current neo-adjuvant regimens this is not meaningful in PDAC. However, screening for targetable alterations in clinical setting seems beneficial for several tumor types, especially PanNETs and ACCs. The significance of the genetic signature of PanNETs warrants further study in order to determine the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value hereof. More specifically, altered chromatin remodeling that is frequently observed in these tumors should be further elaborated in order to find targetable leads. One of the primary focuses should be on establishing representative in vitro and in vivo study models, which are currently inadequate

The treatment effect of liver transplantation versus liver resection for hcc

For patients presenting with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria, either liver resection or liver transplantation can be performed. However, to what extent either of these treatment options is superior in terms of long-term survival is unknown. Obviously, the comparison of these treatments is complicated by several selection processes. In this article, we comprehensively review the current literature with a focus on factors accounting for selection bias. Thus far, studies that did not perform an intention-to-treat analysis conclude that liver transplantation is superior to liver resection for early-stage hepatocellula