2 research outputs found

    PowerPoint Slides for: Acute Kidney Injury and In-Hospital Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Study

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Post-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significantly increased short- and long-term mortalities, and renal loss. Few studies have compared the incidence of post-procedural AKI and in-hospital mortality between 2 major modalities of revascularization - coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) - and results have been inconsistent. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We generated a propensity score-matched cohort that includes a total of 286,670 hospitalizations with multi-vessel coronary disease undergoing CABG or PCI (2004-2012) from the National Inpatient Sample database. We compared incidence of AKI, AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), in-hospital mortality, hospital stay, and charges between CABG and PCI groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The incidence of AKI after CABG was higher than PCI (8.9 vs. 4.5%, OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.99-2.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The incidence of AKI requiring RRT was also higher after CABG (1.1 vs. 0.5%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.96-2.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Likewise, in-hospital mortality was higher after CABG than PCI (2.0 vs. 1.4%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.35-1.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (stages I-IV), those undergoing CABG was associated with 2.0-2.3-fold higher odds of developing AKI than those undergoing PCI. The patients treated with CABG had a significantly longer hospital stay and higher hospital charges. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients undergoing CABG are associated with (1) increased risk of developing post-procedural AKI, (2) higher likelihood of receiving RRT, and (3) worse short-term survival. Long-term renal outcome remains to be studied.</p

    Supplementary Material for: Patiromer Decreases Serum Potassium and Phosphate Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Persistent hyperkalemia (serum potassium (K) ≥5.5 mEq/l) is a common condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients, is associated with increased mortality, and treatment options are limited. The effect of patiromer, a gastrointestinal K binder, on serum K was examined in HD patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Six hyperkalemic HD patients (5 anuric) were admitted to clinical research units for 15 days (1 pretreatment week and 1 patiromer treatment week) and they received a controlled diet with identical meals on corresponding days of pretreatment and treatment weeks. Phosphate (P) binders were discontinued on admission. Patiromer, 12.6 g daily (divided 4.2 g TID with meals), was started on the Monday morning following the last pretreatment week blood sampling. Serum and 24-hour stool samples were collected daily. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean ± SE serum K decreased (maximum change per corresponding day, 0.6 ± 0.2 mEq/l, p = 0.009) and fecal K increased 58% on patiromer compared with the pretreatment week. During the pretreatment week, 69.0, 47.6, and 11.9% of patients' serum K values were ≥5.5, ≥6.0, and ≥6.5 mEq/l, respectively. This was reduced to 38.1% (p = 0.009), 11.9% (p < 0.001), and 2.4% (p = 0.2) on patiromer. Following P binder discontinuation, the long interdialytic interval mean ± SE serum P numerically increased from 5.8 ± 0.4 to 7.0 ± 0.5 mg/dl (p = 0.06). On patiromer, P decreased from 7.0 ± 0.5 to 6.2 ± 0.5 mg/dl (p = 0.04). While on patiromer, fecal P numerically increased by 112 ± 72 mg/day (17%; p = 0.1792; range -148 to 344 mg/day). No patient discontinued patiromer because of adverse events (AEs); none had serious AEs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In 6 hyperkalemic HD patients, patiromer decreased serum K and P levels and increased fecal K.</p
    corecore