Eculizumab Dosing Regimen in Atypical HUS: Possibilities for Individualized Treatment

Contains fulltext : 177003.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access) Contains fulltext : 177003pos.pdf (postprint version ) (Open Access)Recent studies indicate that eculizumab is often given in excess to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) patients. Individualization of treatment is thus highly requested; however, data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of eculizumab remain limited. We analyzed 11 patients during induction (weekly), maintenance (2-weekly), and tapering (every 3-8 weeks) phases of treatment. The trough eculizumab levels increased with each additional dose during the induction phase (depending on body weight). During maintenance, high eculizumab concentrations of up to 772 mug/mL were observed. The levels decreased with each following dose during tapering (3- and 4-week intervals); however, three patients maintained target eculizumab levels over long time periods (30-48 weeks). At intervals of 6-8 weeks, target eculizumab levels were no longer attained. Serum samples with eculizumab concentrations >/=50 mug/mL showed adequate complement blockade. Our data provide essential insight for optimization of eculizumab dosing schemes and lessening of therapy burden for the patients and cost of the treatment

Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire)

Background: The aim of this study was to develop, together with the Lung Foundation Netherlands and Dutch Kidney Patients Association, patients and clinicians, a measure to evaluate patient experiences with the orphan drugs pirfenidone (for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF]) and eculizumab (for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome [aHUS]), as well as a generic measure of patient experiences and satisfaction with medications. Methods: Development of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) questionnaire consisted of four phases: literature review (phase I); focus groups and individual patient interviews (phase II); item generation (phase III); and face and content validity testing (phase IV). Literature review aimed to identify existing disease-specific and generic patient experience measures to provide guidance on the domains of medication use relevant to patients, the number of items and type of response categories, and to generate an initial pool of items. Subsequent focus groups and patient interviews were conducted to gain insight into the perceived effectiveness of the therapies, the bur

Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire

Background: This study assessed the validity and reliability of the generic module of the recently developed Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) questionnaire in a sample of patients in the Netherlands. Methods: The generic module of the PESaM questionnaire consists of 18 items related to the domains effectiveness, side effects and ease of use of medications. It assesses patients’ experiences regarding the impact of the medication on daily life, health and satisfaction. In 2017, the PESaM questionnaire was sent out to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients using pirfenidone or nintedanib, atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome patients receiving eculizumab and patients using tacrolimus after kidney transplantation. Mean scores for each domain were calculated applying a scoring algorithm. Construct validity and reliability were assessed using recommended methods. Results: 188 participants completed the generic module, of whom 48% used pirfenidone, 36% nintedanib, 11% tacrolimus and 5% eculizumab. The generic module has good structural properties. Internal consistency values of the domains were satisfactory (i.e. Cronbach’s coefficient alpha above 0.7). Confirmatory factor analysis provided further evidence for construct validity, with good convergent and discriminant validity. The PESaM questionnaire also showed different scores for patients using different medications, in line with expectations, and was therefore able to differentiate between patient groups. Test–retest reliability of the items and domains were rated as moderate to fair (i.e. intraclass coefficients ranged between 0.18 and 0.76). Conclusions: The PESaM questionnaire is a unique patient-reported outcome measure evaluating patient experiences and satisfaction with medications. It has been developed in conjunction with patients, ensuring coverage of domains and issues relevant from the patient’s perspective. This study has shown promising validity of the generic module of the PESaM questionnaire. Further research is recommended to assess reliability in greater detail as well as the responsiveness of the measure. Trial registration: The study

A new era in hemolytic uremic syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment of a rare disease

Contains fulltext : 201129.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 8 maart 2019Promotores : Heuvel, L.P.W.J. van den, Wetzels, J.F.M. Co-promotores : Kar, N.C.A.J. van de, Volokhina, E.B

Unusual severe case of hemolytic uremic syndrome due to Shiga toxin 2d-producing E. coli O80:H2

Contains fulltext : 174079.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is one of the most common causes of acute renal failure in children, with the majority of cases caused by an infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Whereas O157 is still the predominant STEC serotype, non-O157 serotypes are increasingly associated with STEC-HUS. However, little is known about this emerging and highly diverse group of non-O157 serotypes. With supportive therapy, STEC-HUS is often self-limiting, with occurrence of chronic sequelae in just a small proportion of patients. CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: In this case report, we describe a 16-month-old boy with a highly severe and atypical presentation of STEC-HUS. Despite the presentation with multi-organ failure and extensive involvement of central nervous system due to extensive thrombotic microangiopathy (suggestive of atypical HUS), fecal diagnostics revealed an infection with the rare serotype: shiga toxin 2d-producing STEC O80:H2. CONCLUSIONS: This report underlines the importance of STEC diagnostic tests in all children with HUS, including those with an atypical presentation, and emphasizes the importance of molecular and serotyping assays to estimate the virulence of an STEC strain

Eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: strategies toward restrictive use

The original version of this article unfortunately contained two mistakes. The presentation of Table 1 and Fig. 1 was incorrect. The corrected versions are given below

Author's Reply to Liu et al.: "Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Eculizumab, and Possibilities for an Individualized Approach to Eculizumab"

Contains fulltext : 229067.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access

Safety and effectiveness of restrictive eculizumab treatment in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome

Item does not contain fulltex

Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire

Contains fulltext : 201280.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access