Haemovigilance:current practices and future developments

Haemovigilance is the systematic surveillance of adverse events in the transfusion chain, and encompasses activities that contribute to the safety and quality in the process of blood donation and transfusion. From the start in the early 1990s, haemovigilance has put emphasis on different adverse reactions and incidents in recipients and subsequently in donors, pointing to vulnerabilities in the transfusion chain and areas for prevention. More recently, the monitoring of efficacy and efficiency of transfusion practice has been introduced in the concept of haemovigilance. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the current status and future developments of haemovigilance. Haemovigilance is part of the quality systems of the blood collection establishments, transfusion laboratories and the transfusion institutions. The monitoring, investigation and analysis of adverse events generates relevant data for the quality cycle of these systems, driving continuous improvement in transfusion practice. Recommendations based on haemovigilance findings have led to changes in clinical guidelines and policies. Despite the progress haemovigilance has made, further developments are needed. Current challenges lie in the field of the establishment of haemovigilance systems in low resource settings, the international harmonisation of definitions and the prevention of underreporting. In addition, the causal relationship between the transfusion and the reaction is often unclear. Biomarkers may aid in the imputability assessment and their role in the diagnosis of transfusion reactions needs to be further investigated. Future developments are expected in automated reporting, the use of big data and increased shareability of international data, contributing to a better understanding of the causal mechanisms and risk factors, and to prevention of adverse events. Haemovigilance is an evolving discipline and will continue to contribute to improving the safety of blood donation and transfusion

Haemovigilance: current practices and future developments

Haemovigilance is the systematic surveillance of adverse events in the transfusion chain, and encompasses activities that contribute to the safety and quality in the process of blood donation and transfusion. From the start in the early 1990s, haemovigilance has put emphasis on different adverse reactions and incidents in recipients and subsequently in donors, pointing to vulnerabilities in the transfusion chain and areas for prevention. More recently, the monitoring of efficacy and efficiency of transfusion practice has been introduced in the concept of haemovigilance. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the current status and future developments of haemovigilance. Haemovigilance is part of the quality systems of the blood collection establishments, transfusion laboratories and the transfusion institutions. The monitoring, investigation and analysis of adverse events generates relevant data for the quality cycle of these systems, driving continuous improvement in transfusion practice. Recommendations based on haemovigilance findings have led to changes in clinical guidelines and policies. Despite the progress haemovigilance has made, further developments are needed. Current challenges lie in the field of the establishment of haemovigilance systems in low resource settings, the international harmonisation of definitions and the prevention of underreporting. In addition, the causal relationship between the transfusion and the reaction is often unclear. Biomarkers may aid in the imputability assessment and their role in the diagnosis of transfusion reactions needs to be further investigated. Future developments are expected in automated reporting, the use of big data and increased shareability of international data, contributing to a better understanding of the causal mechanisms and risk factors, and to prevention of adverse events. Haemovigilance is an evolving discipline and will continue to contribute to improving the safety of blood donation and transfusion

Alloexposed blood donors and transfusion-related acute lung injury: a case-referent study

Clinical epidemiolog

Male-only fresh-frozen plasma for transfusion-related acute lung injury prevention: before-and-after comparative cohort study

Clinical epidemiolog

Storage time of blood products and transfusion-related acute lung injury

Clinical epidemiolog

Reported transfusion-related acute lung injury associated with solvent/detergent plasma – A case series

Background: Antibody-mediated transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is caused by donor HLA or HNA antibodies in plasma-containing products. In the Netherlands 55,000 units of solvent/detergent plasma (SDP), a pooled plasma product, are transfused yearly. It's produced by combining plasma from hundreds of donors, diluting harmful antibodies. Due to a lack of reported cases following implementation, some have labeled SDP as “TRALI safe”. Study design and methods: Pulmonary transfusion reactions involving SDP reported to the Dutch national hemovigilance network in 2016–2019 were reviewed. Reporting hospitals were contacted for additional information, cases with TRALI and imputability definite, probable, or possible were included and informed consent was sought. Results: A total of three TRALI and nine TACO cases were reported involving SDP. The imputability of one TRALI case was revised from possible to unlikely and excluded; in one case no informed consent was obtained. We present a case description of TRALI following SDP transfusion in a 69-year-old male, 3 days following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The patient received one unit of SDP to correct a heparin-induced coagulopathy, prior to removal of a spinal catheter post-operatively. Within five hours he developed hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring intubation, hypotension, bilateral chest infiltrates, and leucopenia. The patient made a full recovery. Conclusion: This case of TRALI, following transfusion of a single unit of SDP to a patient without ARDS risk factors, demonstrates that TRALI can occur with this product. Clinicians should remain vigilant and continue to report suspected cases, to help further understanding of SDP-associated TRALI

Transition from fresh frozen plasma to solvent/detergent plasma in the Netherlands:comparing clinical use and transfusion reaction risks

Plasma transfusion is indicated for replenishment of coagulative proteins to stop or prevent bleeding. In 2014, the Netherlands switched from using ~300mL fresh frozen plasma units to 200mL solvent/detergent plasma units. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of solvent/detergent plasma on clinical plasma use, associated bleeding, and transfusion reaction incidences. Using diagnostic data from six Dutch hospitals, national blood bank data, and national hemovigilance data for 2011-2017, we compared the plasma/RBC units ratio (f) and the mean number of plasma and RBC units transfused for fresh frozen plasma (~300mL) and solvent/detergent plasma (200mL) for various patient groups, and calculated odds ratios comparing their associated transfusion reaction risks. Analyzing 13,910 transfusion episodes, the difference (Δf = fSD - fFFP) in mean plasma/RBC ratio (f) was negligible (Δfentire_cohort = 0.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.02 to 0.05]; p=0.48). Solvent/detergent plasma was associated with fewer RBC units transfused per episode in gynecological (difference of mean number of units -1.66 [95% CI: -2.72, -0.61]) and aneurysm (-0.97 [-1.59, -0.35]) patients. Solvent/detergent plasma was associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than fresh frozen plasma (odds ratio 0.37 [0.18, 0.77; p<0.01]) while the differences for most transfusion reactions were not statistically significant. Solvent/detergent plasma units, despite being 1/3 smaller by volume than fresh frozen plasma units, are not associated with a higher plasma/RBC ratio. Solvent/detergent plasma is associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than fresh frozen plasma