92 research outputs found

    Thoughts on “eResearch”: a Scientist’s Perspective

    Get PDF
    In response to the burgeoning practice of collaborative, networked, data-intensive research (known as eScience), university and research libraries are devoting significant consideration, effort and resources toward expanding their responsibilities to include research data services. The jargon that the librarianship community uses to discuss data -driven research is inconsistent and confusing, especially to non-librarians. This is problematic because when we attempt to engage research scientists in an effort to provide services, we risk alienating our potential stakeholders by using language that they don’t understand. As a recent transplant to the library community, the difference between librarian and research scientist perceptions of data-driven research, and the vocabulary surrounding it, have been surprising. This paper summarizes the problem of “eResearch,” spoken from the perspective of a recent scientist-turned-data librarian. The main conclusions reached are that “eResearch” is a meaningless term that should be avoided, and that data support services needn’t be couched as an eScience issue

    Implementing a Graduate-level Data Information Literacy Curriculum at Oregon State University: Approach, Outcomes and Lessons Learned

    Get PDF
    Purpose This poster examines the development and inaugural offering of a credit-bearing graduate-level course in data information literacy (DIL). The purpose of the course was to enable students to acquire foundational knowledge and skills in DIL that would support long-term habits in planning, management, preservation and sharing of research data. Setting/Participants Oregon State University Libraries partnered with the Graduate School to facilitate the process of establishing a new credit-bearing course in the OSU catalog. The course is open to graduate students from all disciplines without any prerequisites, and is taught by the Libraries’ Data Management Specialist. Brief Description This poster describes the development and implementation of a new course in data information literacy for graduate students. Curricular materials were drawn from the New England Collaborative Data Management Curriculum (NECDMC), the DataONE Education Modules, and the MANTRA online course materials. The pedagogical approach for the course combined outcomes-centered course design with active learning techniques. The approach was predicated on the idea that getting the students actively engaged with the content and techniques of data management would be more effective than lecture alone. This approach was also driven by the practical reality that while the course content was necessarily discipline agnostic, successful learning outcomes depended on the students’ ability to apply the material to discipline specific standards of practice (e.g. metadata and data documentation, data sharing formats and methods, etc.). The goal was that after taking the course, the students would successfully incorporate data management best practices into their daily workflow. Such behavioral change takes self-reflection ( How does this material relate to me? ) and practice, both of which I strove to offer during class meetings. The 2-credit class met twice per week for 50 minutes. For each meeting a lesson plan was created that included anticipated timing, learning outcomes, lecture content, teaching strategies, student products, the DIL core competency addressed and assessment approach, if any. Lesson plans also included the associated readings and homework assignment, if any. Not every specific learning outcome had an assessment component, but closely related outcomes were assessed together. Periodic course assessment was also performed through anonymous student surveys, with the objective of gauging course efficacy and quality, and to obtain suggested modifications or improvements. The midterm assignment for the course was a scaled back Data Curation Profile, and the final exam assignment was to create a data management plan for their research project. Results/Outcome The inaugural course had an official enrollment of 11 students, including one faculty member enrolled for credit and two as non-credit auditors. I also had an additional faculty member “sitting in” on lectures who did not complete any of the outside assignments. The disciplinary range of the students was broad: six students from the College of Public Health and Human Sciences, two from the College of Forestry, and one each from the Colleges of Veterinary Medicine, Science, and Agriculture. Aside from the faculty members, student degree paths ranged from non-thesis master’s to Ph.D., with some of the students having a very well defined research project already planned and others much less so. With all of the variability in student disciplinary background and experience, in-class learning activities and the homework, midterm and final exam assignments were relied upon to facilitate application of the generalized course content to their individual, discipline-specific circumstances. The content and quality of the students’ assignments demonstrated that this approach was successful. Conclusions The course is not yet complete at the time of this abstract submission, but the poster will summarize the during- and post-class surveys that were used to determine the success and impact of the instruction. Suggested modifications for next year’s course will also be discussed

    Curricular design strategies for teaching research data management to graduate students

    Get PDF

    Digital Asset Management System Assessment: Use Cases for Digital Infrastructure Re-design

    Get PDF
    Academic libraries that offer digital asset management systems (DAMS) and services such as an institutional repository, data curation services, and digitization of historic documents face the need to assess and refine services. This need can be most apparent when considering changes to DAMS infrastructure. The proposed panel presents the experiences of OSU Libraries and Press as we move to a new DAMS system for ScholarsArchive@OSU. Before considering DAMS platforms, we conducted an in-depth requirements analysis with our stakeholders, both within our organization as well as with stakeholders outside of the organization. The panelists will include OSU faculty and administrators selected for requirements interviews who present unique use cases for the DAMS, including those for whom the current iteration of the DAMS does not provide adequate service. Audience members will learn about using requirements analysis to design new digital infrastructures and will learn about popular digital library technologies (e.g. Hydra, DSpace)

    Building professional development opportunities in data services for academic librarians

    Get PDF
    Research data management represents a significant professional development area for academic librarians –significant for its growing importance to the profession, since researchers are increasingly expected to comply with research data management requirements, and for the extent of competence needed by librarians to support researchers in research data management practices and plans. This article recounts how the Association of College and Research Libraries is fostering professional development opportunities in research data management. The authors describe two key endeavors: (1) the development and deployment of a needs assessment survey, which allowed insight into the types of librarians expressing the most need; and (2) planning and implementation of a pre-conference workshop for ACRL 2015, intended to prototype a future professional development offering. The article concludes by discussing additional assessment that was done following the workshop and how the pre-conference laid the foundation for proposing a ‘‘roadshow’’ for research data management, similar to what the Association of College and Research Libraries sponsors for scholarly communication
    • 

    corecore