RANDOMIZED STUDY OF IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR AS FIRST-CHOICE THERAPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL STRATEGY IN POSTINFARCT SUDDEN-DEATH SURVIVORS

Background In retrospective studies of sudden cardiac death survivors, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) compares favorably with medical and surgical therapy. Thus, use of the conventional strategy of starting treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AD), at least in certain patient categories, may be questionable. The goal of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of ICD implantation as first-choice therapy versus the conventional therapeutic strategy of starting with AD. Methods and Results Sixty consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest caused by old myocardial infarction were randomly assigned early ICD implantation (n=29) or conventional therapy (n=31). Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Therapy in each patient was always guided by ECG monitoring, exercise testing, and programmed electrical stimulation (PES). Primary end points (main outcome events, including death, recurrent cardiac arrest, and cardiac transplantation), number of invasive procedures and antiarrhythmic therapy changes, and duration of hospitalization were compared. Median follow-up was 24 months (mean, 27 months). In the early ICD group, 4 patients (14%) died, all of cardiac causes. In the conventional group, 20 patients failed AD and subsequently underwent map-guided ventricular tachycardia (VT) surgery (6 patients) or ICD implantation (14 patients). Of the 6 VT surgery patients, 1 died, 1 had cardiac transplantation, and 1 had an ICD implantation because of persistent inducibility despite the addition of AD. Of the 11 patients who remained on AD as sole therapy, 2 died in the hospital before they could be retested by PES, leaving 9, judged adequately protected by AD alone. Of those, 5 died, and 1 survived recurrent cardiac an est followed by ICD implantation. In total, 16 conventionally treated patients ended up with late ICD implantation, 3 of whom died. Thus, total mortality in the conventional group was 11 patients (35%): 4 died suddenly, 5 died of heart failure, and 2 died of noncardiac causes. Comparison of the main outcome events in both strategies showed a significant difference in favor of early ICD implantation (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.85; P=.02). In addition, the early ICD group underwent fewer invasive procedures (median, 1 versus 3; P Conclusions These data suggest that ICD implantation as first choice is preferable to the conventional approach in survivors of cardiac arrest caused by old myocardial infarction. Conventionally treated patients are likely to end up with an ICD, and those who remain on AD as sole therapy have a high risk of death regardless of efficacy assessment, including PES

Ten year follow-up after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the early days forever cured, or a source for new arrhythmias?

Background: Radiofrequency (1717) catheter ablation is highly effective with a low complication rate. However, lesions created by RF energy are irreversible, inhomogeneous, and therefore potentially proarrhythmic. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the magnitude and importance of long-term proarrhythmic effects of RF energy. Methods and Results: Between 1991 and 1995, 120 patients underwent RF ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Patient data were collected by contacting patients and/or filling out a questionnaire, and medical files were screened for recurrent, documented arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment, and repeated EP study. Referring cardiologists were asked about recurrences of tachyarrhythmias. Fourteen patients (11%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 10 years, six patients died. Recurrences of AVNRT were not any more observed after 3 years after ablation. A total of 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias, 6 from type 1 atria] flutter, 6 from atrial tachycardia, 9 from atrial fibrillation, and finally 16 from symptomatic premature atria] contractions (PACs), needing medical treatment or a combination of these arrhythmias. Nine patients underwent pacemaker implantation, 4 after developing procedural atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances, 2 after His ablation for permanent atria] fibrillation, 1 patient for sick sinus syndrome, and another 2 patients after developing late AV block, respectively, 7 and 9 years after ablation. Conclusion: During long-term follow-up after RF ablation for AVNRT, no AVNRT recurrences were observed, but 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias or late AV block. This potential proarrhythmic effect of RF energy promotes the application of alternative energy sources for ablative therapies for cardiac arrhythmias