Outcomes of open repair of postdissection abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background: Evidence to guide management of postdissection abdominal aortic aneurysms (PDAAA) is lacking. This study describes the outcomes of open repair of PDAAA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all consecutive patients treated with open repair for PDAAA after a Stanford type A or type B thoracic aortic dissection between January 2006 and December 2017 in two vascular referral centers. Preceding type B dissection treatment could include conservative or surgical management. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, complication rates, survival, and reintervention-free survival. Survival and reintervention-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Reintervention was defined as any endovascular or surgical intervention after the index procedure. Results: Included were 36 patients (27 men [75%]) with a median age of 64 years (range, 35-81 years). The 30-day mortality was 2.7%. The median follow-up was 16 months (range, 0-88 months). The postoperative course was uneventful in 21 patients (58%). The most frequent complications were postoperative bleeding requiring repeat laparotomy (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 3), congestive heart failure (n = 2), new-onset atrial fibrillation (n = 2), mesenteric ischemia requiring left hemicolectomy (n=1), and ischemic cerebrovascular accident (n = 1). Renal failure requiring hemodialysis developed in one patient. The overall survival at 1 year was 88.8%. Reintervention-free survival was 95.5% after 1 year and 88.6% after 2 years. Conclusions: Open repair of PDAAA can be performed with a low mortality rate and an acceptable complication rate, comparable with elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms without dissection

ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR IN WIDE INFRARENAL NECKS - INCREASED RISK OF COMPLICATIONS?

EVAR has become the predominant repair technique for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Long-term clinical success relies greatly upon a long-lasting proximal seal. EVAR has achieved good outcomes on the short-term in patients with hostile neck features such as large proximal necks. However, the long-term outcomes in these patients is greatly unknown. In this article, the authors perform a literature review in order to assess the clinical impact of wide proximal neck on mid to long-term outcomes following EVAR

First- and second-generation drug-eluting balloons for femoro-popliteal arterial obstructions: update of technique and results

Item does not contain fulltextThe use of drug-eluting balloons for treatment of long-segment femoropopliteal artery obstructions has become widespread in recent years. The possibility to deliver a drug into the arterial wall with sustained antiproliferative effects, without leaving behind metal scaffolding, seems very promising. The current generation of drug-eluting balloons differs in the formulation of the drug (usually paclitaxel), technique of coating, and the elution excipients. Results of published randomized trials are reviewed in this report. A new innovative coating technique has been introduced recently. The PRIMUS(R) coronary drug-eluting balloon and the Legflow(R) peripheral drug-eluting balloon consist of paclitaxel nanoparticles that are embedded underneath the surface of the balloon as well as inside a new shellolic acid drug-release matrix. Risk for dislodgement of the paclitaxel particles is minimized in the newest generation of drug-eluting balloons. Short-term in vitro and in vivo results of this stable, coated balloon are promising, and large randomized trials have been started recently to gather more long-term and robust clinical data

Drug coated balloon supported Supera stent versus Supera stent in intermediate and long-segment lesions of the superficial femoral artery:2-year results of the RAPID trial

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of occlusive disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) has evolved from plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) through primary stenting strategy to drug eluting technology-based approach. The RAPID trial investigates the added value of drug coated balloons (DCB, Legflow) in a primary stenting strategy (Supera stent) for intermediate (5-15 cm) and long segment (>15 cm) SFA lesions. METHODS: In this multicenter, patient-blinded trial, 160 patients with intermittent claudication, ischemic rest pain, or tissue loss due to intermediate or long SFA lesions were randomized (1:1) between Supera + DCB and Supera. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 2 years, defined as freedom from restenosis on duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio < 2.4). RESULTS: At 2 years, primary patency was 55.1% (95%CI: 43.1%-67.1%) in the Supera + DCB group versus 48.3% (95%CI: 35.6%-61.0%) in the Supera group (P=0.957). Per protocol analysis showed a primary patency rate of 60.9% (95%CI: 48.6%-73.2%) in the Supera + DCB group versus 49.8% (95%CI: 36.9%-62.7%) in the Supera group (P=0.469). The overall mortality rate was 5% in both groups (P=0.975). Sustained functional improvement was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results in the current trial of a primary Supera stenting strategy are consistent with other trials reporting on treatment of intermediate and long SFA lesions. A DCB supported Supera stent strategy did not improve patency rate compared to a Supera stent only strategy

Mid-term proximal sealing zone evaluation after fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is used in pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms to achieve a durable proximal seal. This study investigated the mid-term course of the proximal fenestrated stent graft (FSG) sealing zone on the first and latest available post-FEVAR computed tomographic angiography (CTA) scan in a single-center series. METHODS: In 61 elective FEVAR patients, the shortest length of circumferential apposition between the FSG and the aortic wall (shortest apposition length [SAL]) was retrospectively assessed on the first and last available postoperative CTA scans. Patient records were reviewed for FEVAR-related procedural details, complications, and reinterventions. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time between the FEVAR procedure and the first and last CTA scan was 35 (30-48) days and 2.6 (1.2-4.3) years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) SAL was 38 (29-48) mm, and 44 (34-59) mm on the first and last CTA scans, respectively. During follow-up, the SAL increased >5 mm in 32 patients (52%), and decreased >5 mm in six patients (10%). Reintervention was performed for a type 1a endoleak in one patient. Twelve other patients needed 17 reinterventions for other FEVAR-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Good mid-term apposition of the FSG in the pararenal aorta was achieved post-FEVAR, and the occurrence of type 1a endoleaks was low. The number of reinterventions was substantial, however, but for reasons other than loss of proximal seal

Five-year outcomes of mechano-chemical ablation of primary great saphenous vein incompetence

Objective The aim of the study is to report long-term results after mechano-chemical ablation for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Methods Mechano-chemical ablation was performed using the ClariVein device with polidocanol as the sclerosant. Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification, Venous-Clinical-Severity-Score (VCSS), anatomical-success, RAND-SF36 and the Aberdeen-Varicose-Vein-Questionnaire (AVVQ) were obtained by clinical examination, questionnaires and duplex ultrasonography through five years' follow-up (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01459263). Results Ninety-four patients (113 great saphenous veins) were included in the study. Five-year follow-up data were available for 75 limbs (66.4%). Freedom from anatomical failure was 78.7% (N = 45) with 64.6% (N = 42) having an improvement in the VCSS >= 1. A total of five reinterventions were performed through five years with a median time to reintervention of 38 months. The VCSS at five years was 2 (IQR 1; 4) and was still significantly improved compared to baseline (p <0.001). A deterioration of the VCSS was observed in 21.5%. Conclusion Through five-year follow-up, there are a significant number of anatomical and clinical failures in this series, mainly driven by partial recanalizations

Incidence and treatment results of Endurant endograft occlusion

Objective: The Endurant endograft (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) is a new-generation device specifically developed to perform well in complex abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomy. Previous reports on the 1- and 2-year results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Endurant endograft showed excellent outcome, including prevention of migration and type I endoleaks, but occurrence and outcome of post-EVAR occlusion have not been determined in a large multicenter patient cohort with midterm follow-up, which is the objective of this study. Methods: Data of consecutive patients treated with the Endurant from December 2007 to April 2012 in three Dutch tertiary vascular referral hospitals were prospectively gathered and retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up consisted of regular office visits, computed tomography angiography at 1 and 12 months after EVAR, and subsequently, duplex ultrasound imaging or computed tomography angiography at regular intervals. Patients with ruptured aneurysms or with earlier abdominal aortic surgery were excluded. The incidence and clinical outcome of endograft occlusions were analyzed. An expert review board assessed all cases in the search for possible causes of occlusion. Results: Included were 496 patients (87.7% male), who were a median age of 74 years (range, 68-78 years). Median follow-up was 1.7 years (range, 0-4.6 years). Twenty graft occlusions (4.0%) occurred during follow-up. Median time between primary EVAR and detection of the occlusion was 1 month, with 55% occurring ≤60 postoperative days and 90% ≤1 year. No association was found between occlusion and sex (P =.28), age (P =.96), or use of an aortouniiliac device (P =.66). Technical error was the considered cause of the occlusion in 12 patients (60%). The estimated freedom from occlusion was 98.4% at 30 days, 95.7% at 1 year, and 95.3% at 3 years. Presenting symptoms of occlusion were acute limb ischemia in 50%. Treatment was surgical (75%) or percutaneous (25%). Successful revascularization was achieved in 17 of 20 patients, but reocclusions occurred in five, resulting in a transfemoral amputation in one patient. Occlusion-related mortality was 0.6% (3 of 496). Conclusions: At a median follow-up of 1.7 years, Endurant endograft occlusion occurred in 4.0% of 496 patients. Most occlusions occurred ≤2 months after EVAR, and rarely after 1 year. A technical justification for occlusion could be found for 60% of patients. A more liberal intraoperative and early postoperative (re)intervention strategy may reduce the occlusion rates and improve outcome

Mid-term results of EVAR in severe proximal aneurysm neck angulation

Objective To determine if mid-term outcome following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Endurant Stent Graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) is influenced by severe proximal neck angulation. Methods A retrospective case–control study was performed using data from a prospective multicenter database. All measurements were obtained using dedicated reconstruction software and center-lumen line reconstruction. Patients with neck length >15 mm, infrarenal angle (β) >75°, and/or suprarenal angle (α) >60°, or neck length >10 mm with β >60°, and/or α >45° were compared with a matched control group. Primary endpoint was primary clinical success. Secondary endpoints were freedom from rupture, type 1A endoleak, stent fractures, freedom from neck-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related adverse events. Morphological neck variation over time was also assessed. Results Forty-five patients were included in the study group and were compared with a matched control group with 65 patients. Median follow-up time was 49.5 months (range 30.5–58.4). The 4-year primary clinical success estimates were 83% and 80% for the angulated and nonangulated groups (p = .42). Proximal neck angulation did not affect primary clinical success in a multivariate model (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 0.55–4.41). Groups did not differ significantly in regard to freedom from rupture (p = .79), freedom from type 1A endoleak (p = .79), freedom from neck-related adverse events (p = .68), and neck-related reinterventions (p = .68). Neck angle reduction was more pronounced in patients with severe proximal neck angulation (mean Δα −15.6°, mean Δβ −30.6°) than in the control group (mean Δα −0.39°, mean Δβ −5.9°) (p < .001). Conclusion Mid-term outcomes following EVAR with the Endurant Stent Graft were not influenced by severe proximal neck angulation in our population. Despite the conformability of the device, moderate aortic neck remodeling was identified in the group of patients with angulated neck anatomy on the first computed tomography scan after implantation with no important further remodeling afterwards. No device integrity failures were encountered