46 research outputs found

    Proportion of patients retained in care on December 31, 2012, at the national level in South Africa among 55,836 patients initiating ART in 2004–2006 by district of enrollment.

    No full text
    <p>Proportion retained in care was categorized in quintiles. Districts: BUF, Buffalo City; CPT, City of Cape Town; DC1, West Coast; DC2, Cape Winelands; DC3, Overberg; DC4, Eden; DC5, Central Karoo; DC6, Namakwa; DC7, Pixley ka Seme; DC8, Siyanda; DC9, Frances Baard; DC10, Cacadu; DC12, Amathole; DC13, Chris Hani; DC14, Ukhahlamba; DC15, O. R. Tambo; DC16, Xhariep; DC18, Lejweleputswa; DC19, Thabo Mofutsanyana; DC20, Fezile Dabi; DC21, Ugo; DC22, UMgungundlovu; DC23, Uthukela; DC24, Umzinyathi; DC25, Amajuba; DC26, Zululand; DC27, Umkhanyakude; DC28, Uthungulu; DC29, iLembe; DC30, Gert Sibande; DC31, Nkangala; DC32, Ehlanzeni; DC33, Mopani; DC34, Vhembe; DC35, Capricorn; DC36, Waterberg; DC37, Bojanala; DC38, Ngaka Modiri Molema; DC39, Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati; DC40, Dr Kenneth Kaunda; DC42, Sedibeng; DC43, Sisonke; DC44, Alfred Nzo; DC45, John Taolo Gaetsewe; DC47, Greater Sekhukhune; DC48, W. Rand; EKU, Ekurhuleni; ETH, eThekwini; JHB, Johannesburg; LS, Lesotho; MAN, Mangaung; NMA, Nelson Mandela Bay Metro; TSH, City of Tshwane. NHLS, National Health Laboratory Service.</p

    Effect of patient transfer on retention estimates overall in South Africa among 55,836 patients initiating ART in 2004–2006, with attrition defined as retained in care on December 31, 2012.

    No full text
    <p>Effect of patient transfer on retention estimates overall in South Africa among 55,836 patients initiating ART in 2004–2006, with attrition defined as retained in care on December 31, 2012.</p

    Retention by CD4 count at first viral load (retained in care on December 31, 2012) at the national level in South Africa among 55,836 patients initiating ART in 2004–2006 (retrospective definition).

    No full text
    <p>Retention by CD4 count at first viral load (retained in care on December 31, 2012) at the national level in South Africa among 55,836 patients initiating ART in 2004–2006 (retrospective definition).</p

    Crude and adjusted relative risk calculations for mutation prevalence and drug resistance call between different groups.

    No full text
    <p>Log-binomial regression analysis was used and the model was adjusted with CD4, VL and time on treatment where possible. Adjusted relative risk was only calculated for N: Number of patients; RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval; VL: RNA Viral Load; ART: antiretroviral treatment; 3TC: lamivudine; FTC: emtricitabine; ABC: abacavir; AZT: zidovudine; d4T: stavudine; ddI: didanosine; TDF: tenofovir; EFV: efavirenz; ETR: etravirine; NVP: nevirapine; RPV: rilpivirine; S: susceptible; IR: intermediate resistance; HR: high-level resistance; ND: not done</p><p>Crude and adjusted relative risk calculations for mutation prevalence and drug resistance call between different groups.</p

    Adjusted<sup>*</sup> hazard ratios of predictors of national-level attrition in South Africa’s national ART program (<i>n =</i> 55,836).

    No full text
    <p>Adjusted<sup><a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002589#t003fn001" target="_blank">*</a></sup> hazard ratios of predictors of national-level attrition in South Africa’s national ART program (<i>n =</i> 55,836).</p
    corecore