6 research outputs found
Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
Contains fulltext :
57643.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects
Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty
Item does not contain fulltex
Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years.
Item does not contain fulltextThe outcome of total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture is compromised. We studied if the bone impaction grafting technique could provide long-term prosthesis survival in deformed and irregular acetabula. We studied 20 hips in 20 patients (mean age, 53.3 years; range, 35-75 years) that were reconstructed with acetabular bone impaction grafting and a cemented total hip prosthesis after acetabular fracture. No patient was lost to followup. At review the mean followup was 9.5 years (range, 3-18 years) and the average Harris hip score was 93 (range, 62-100). During followup there were two cup revisions: one after 14.5 years for septic loosening, and one after 15.3 years for aseptic loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the cup with end-point revision for any reason was 100% at 10 years and 80% (95% CI; range, 62-98%) after 15 years. With end-point cup revision for aseptic loosening the survival rate was 100% at 10 years. Acetabular bone impaction grafting with a cemented cup is a biologically attractive technique with good long-term survival used to reconstruct bone stock loss after posttraumatic arthritis. The complication and reoperation rate was low in this relatively young group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (Case series--no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
No negative effects of bone impaction grafting with bone and ceramic mixtures.
Item does not contain fulltextReconstructing large loaded bone defects with ceramic bone graft extenders is tempting considering the expected future donor bone shortage. However, whether there are negative effects is unknown. Standardized large defects in the acetabulum of goats were created and subsequently reconstructed with metal mesh and impacted morselized cancellous bone grafts or a 50/50% volume mixture of tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules and morselized cancellous bone grafts using the bone impaction grafting technique. Subsequently, a cemented total hip prosthesis was inserted. Clinically, no differences were observed between groups. Most of the morselized cancellous bone graft had been resorbed and incorporated into new bone after 15 weeks. The large tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules were integrated, the smaller crushed tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules were surrounded by osteoclasts or engulfed by macrophages and giant cells. The cement penetration into the reconstructive layer and the quality of the bone based on a semiquantitative score were similar in both groups. We found no suggestion of tricalcium-hydroxyapatite granule-induced third-body wear in this short-term followup study. No negative effects were observed in this study, and therefore, it seems reasonable to use tricalcium-hydroxyapatite granules in a 50/50% volume mix with morselized cancellous bone graft as a bone graft extender in acetabular revision surgery with the bone impaction grafting technique
Acetabular revision with impacted freeze-dried cancellous bone chips and a cemented cup: a report of 7 cases at 5 to 9 years' follow-up.
Item does not contain fulltextThe long-term results of bone impaction grafting with fresh-frozen femoral head allografts and a cemented cup are favorable. Because of intermittent shortage of fresh-frozen femoral heads at our local bone bank, we used processed freeze-dried bone in 7 acetabular revisions operated between 1989 and 1994. All 7 consecutive patients were followed annually. At final review (March 2000), 1 patient had died after 8.5 years of follow-up of a cause not related to the surgery. In 1 hip, a rerevision was performed for septic loosening 5 years after the previous septic loosening. Radiographically the freeze-dried allografts seemed to incorporate in all cases but the reinfected one; progressive radiolucent lines were not seen, although 1 case had a stable line in 1 zone. The overall survival rate for the 7 acetabular reconstructions at an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-9 years) was 86%. At midterm follow-up, there was no aseptic loosening. In this limited case report, the results at midterm for freeze-dried allograft bone chips in acetabular reconstructions are acceptable