4 research outputs found
Strange fire: John Howe (1630-1705) and the alienation and fragmentation of later Stuart Dissent
Any attempt to understand fully the roots and decline of
English Dissent must address theological issues. Crucial to the
enterprise will be an approach which describes a spectrum of
theological emphases. This thesis will propose a detailed
theological model which employs an ecclesiological spectrum
mapping relative stress on the visible or invisible church. When
this model is applied to the later Stuart period the importance
of John Howe (1630-1705) becomes evident.
Howe's life spanned a time of considerable disruption. His
family was affected by Laud's policies, he became a minister
during the Interregnum and his career lasted into Anne's reign.
His significance has been masked by a hagiographical tradition
and the fascination of historians with Richard Baxter.
Howe's Platonist philosophical roots led him to emphasise
the transcendence of God and, accordingly, the invisible Church.
He was active in Nonconformist affairs during the 1680s. He
entered controversies sparked by "latitudinarians" Tillotson and
Stillingfleet and maintained important contacts among dissident
groups. He built a sophisticated theological case for unity which
hinged on Christian charity. Howe was the crucial figure in
Dissent following the Toleration Act of 1689.
An analysis of Howe's career and writings establishes the
theological model proposed in this thesis. By this, in turn, the
continuity of Dissent with "Puritanism" can be validly
identified. Howe's influence on later Dissent was considerable,
arguably greater than that of either John Locke or Baxter. His
emphasis on the invisible Church relegated uniformity and
structure. An increasing "bias to the invisible" was a factor in
the alienation and fragmentation of later Stuart Dissent