Citation Success: Evidence from Economic History Journal Publications

This study examines the determinants of citation success among authors who recently published their work in economic history journals. We find that full professors, authors from non-economic history departments, and authors working in Anglo-Saxon countries are all more likely to get cited than others whereas affiliation at a top-ranked university has no seeming effect. A number of bibliometric features like article length and number of co-authors also matter for citation success. Our most novel finding is that active diffusion of one’s research, e.g., academic presentations (at conferences, workshops or seminars) or online publication of working papers, has a first-order impact on subsequent citation success.Bibliometrics; Citation Analysis; Citation Success; Economic History; Scientometrics; Poisson Regression

Citation Success: Evidence from Economic History Journal Publications

This study analyses determinants of citation success among authors publishing in economic history journals. Bibliometric features, like article length and number of authors, are positively correlated with the citation rate up to a certain point. Remarkably, publishing in top-ranked journals hardly affects citations. In regard to author-specific characteristics, male authors, full professors and authors working economics or history departments, and authors employed in Anglo-Saxon countries, are more likely to get cited than others. As a ‘shortcut’ to citation success, we find that research diffusion, measured by number of presentations and people mentioned in acknowledgement, boosts the citation rate.bibliometrics; citation analysis; citation success; economic history; scientometrics; Poisson regression

Long-term Health Care Burden of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Analysis of Different Graft Sources

Faculty advisor: Shernan HoltanThis research was supported by the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP)

Similar Risks for Chronic Kidney Disease in Long-Term Survivors of Myeloablative and Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

AbstractChronic kidney disease (CKD) in recipients of myeloablative (MA) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been well characterized. However, the risk of CKD after HCT using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is not well known. We compared the incidence of CKD by conditioning regimen in 221 allogeneic HCT recipients (MA = 117, RIC = 104) who had survived for ≥1 year post-HCT and had no history of CKD pretransplant. CKD was defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months anytime after 180 days post-HCT. The median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-75) for MA and 25 months (range: 12-67) for the RIC group. The 3-year cumulative incidence rate of CKD was 28% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 19%-36%) in MA and 29% (95% CI, 20%-38%) in the RIC group (P = .44). In multivariate analysis, conditioning regimen intensity had no impact on the risk of developing CKD (relative risk [RR] for MA 1.50 [95% CI, 0.78-2.89] versus the RIC regimen). Factors independently associated with an increased risk of CKD were older age at transplant, acute graft-versus-host disease, cyclosporine use for >6 months, and acute kidney injury in the early posttransplant period. CKD is frequent in long-term adult allogeneic HCT survivors, but RIC is associated with similar risks as MA conditioning. Continuous monitoring of renal function is necessary in allogeneic HCT survivors, and studies exploring prevention strategies are needed