4 research outputs found
Privileged Role of Thiolate as the Axial Ligand in Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactions by Oxoiron(IV) Complexes in Shaping the Potential Energy Surface and Inducing Significant H‑Atom Tunneling
An H/D kinetic isotope
effect (KIE) of 80 is found at −20
°C for the oxidation of 9,10-dihydroÂanthracene by [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(TMCS)]<sup>+</sup>, a complex supported by the tetramethylcyclam
(TMC) macrocycle with a tethered thiolate. This KIE value approaches
that previously predicted by DFT calculations. Other [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(TMC)Â(anion)] complexes exhibit values of 20, suggesting that
the thiolate ligand of [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(TMCS)]<sup>+</sup> plays
a unique role in facilitating tunneling. Calculations show that tunneling
is most enhanced (a) when the bond asymmetry between C–H bond
breaking and O–H bond formation in the transition state is
minimized, and (b) when the electrostatic interactions in the O---H---C
moiety are maximal. These two factorsî—¸which peak for the best
electron donor, the thiolate ligandî—¸afford a slim and narrow
barrier through which the H-atom can tunnel most effectively
Characterization of the Fleeting Hydroxoiron(III) Complex of the Pentadentate TMC-py Ligand
Nonheme mononuclear hydroxoironÂ(III)
species are important intermediates in biological oxidations, but
well-characterized examples of synthetic complexes are scarce due
to their instability or tendency to form μ-oxodiironÂ(III) complexes,
which are the thermodynamic sink for such chemistry. Herein, we report
the successful stabilization and characterization of a mononuclear
hydroxoironÂ(III) complex, [Fe<sup>III</sup>(OH)Â(TMC-py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>3</b>; TMC-py = 1<i>-</i>(pyridyl-2′-methyl)-4,8,11-trimethyl-1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane),
which is directly generated from the reaction of [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(TMC-py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>) with 1,4-cyclohexadiene at −40 °C
by H-atom abstraction. Complex <b>3</b> exhibits a UV spectrum
with a λ<sub>max</sub> at 335 nm (ε ≈ 3500 M<sup>–1</sup> cm<sup>–1</sup>) and a molecular ion in its
electrospray ionization mass spectrum at <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 555 with an isotope distribution pattern consistent with
its formulation. Electron paramagnetic resonance and Mössbauer
spectroscopy show <b>3</b> to be a high-spin FeÂ(III) center
that is formed in 85% yield. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure
analysis reveals an Fe–OH bond distance of 1.84 Å, which
is also found in [(TMC-py)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>–O–Cr<sup>III</sup>(OTf)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup> (<b>4</b>) obtained
from the reaction of <b>2</b> with CrÂ(OTf)<sub>2</sub>. The <i>S</i> = 5/2 spin ground state and the 1.84 Ã… Fe–OH
bond distance are supported computationally. Complex <b>3</b> reacts with 1-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) at
−40 °C with a second-order rate constant of 7.1 M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> and an OH/OD kinetic isotope
effect value of 6. On the basis of density functional theory calculations,
the reaction between <b>3</b> and TEMPOH is classified as a
proton-coupled electron transfer as opposed to a hydrogen-atom transfer
Ruthenium Complexes of Thiaporphyrin and Dithiaporphyrin
Successful synthesis and characterization of the six-coordinated
complex [RuÂ(STTP)Â(CO)ÂCl] (<b>1</b>; STTP = 5,10,15,20-tetratolyl-21-thiaporphyrinato)
allowed the development of the coordination chemistry of ruthenium–thiaporphyrin
through dechlorination and metathesis reactions. Accordingly, [Ru<sup>II</sup>(STTP)Â(CO)ÂX] (X = NO<sub>3</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>2</b>), NO<sub>2</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>3</b>), and N<sub>3</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>4</b>)) was synthesized and analyzed by single-crystal
X-ray structural determination and NMR, UV–vis, and FT-IR spectroscopic
methods. An independent reaction of STPPH and [RuÂ(COD)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] led to [Ru<sup>III</sup>(STTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] (<b>5</b>),
which possessed a higher-valent RuÂ(III) center and exhibited good
stability in the solution state. This stability allowed reversible
redox processes in a cyclic voltammetric study. Reactions of [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] (S<sub>2</sub>TTP = 5,10,15,20-tetratolyl-21,23-dithiaporphyrinato)
with AgNO<sub>3</sub> and NaSePh, also via the metathesis strategy,
resulted in novel dithiaporphyrin complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>6</b>) and [Ru<sup>0</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>SePh)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>7</b>), respectively. The structures of <b>6</b> and <b>7</b> were corroborated by X-ray crystallographic analyses. Complex <b>7</b> is an unprecedented ruthenium(0)–dithiaporphyrin
with two <i>bis</i>(phenylseleno)Âmethanes as axial ligands.
A comparison of the analyses of the crude products from reactions
of NaSePh and CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> with or without [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>], further supported by UV–vis spectral
changes under stoichiometric reactions between [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] and NaSePh, suggested a reaction sequence in the order of
(1) formation of a putative [Ru<sup>II</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(SePh)<sub>2</sub>] intermediate, followed by (2) the concerted formation of
PhSe–CH<sub>2</sub>Cl and simultaneously a reduction of RuÂ(II)
to Ru(0) and finally (3) nucleophilic substitution of PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>Cl by excess PhSe<sup>–</sup>, resulting in PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>SePh, which readily coordinated to the Ru(0) and completed the formation
of <i>bis</i>(phenylseleno)Âmethane complex <b>7</b>
Ruthenium Complexes of Thiaporphyrin and Dithiaporphyrin
Successful synthesis and characterization of the six-coordinated
complex [RuÂ(STTP)Â(CO)ÂCl] (<b>1</b>; STTP = 5,10,15,20-tetratolyl-21-thiaporphyrinato)
allowed the development of the coordination chemistry of ruthenium–thiaporphyrin
through dechlorination and metathesis reactions. Accordingly, [Ru<sup>II</sup>(STTP)Â(CO)ÂX] (X = NO<sub>3</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>2</b>), NO<sub>2</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>3</b>), and N<sub>3</sub><sup><b>–</b></sup> (<b>4</b>)) was synthesized and analyzed by single-crystal
X-ray structural determination and NMR, UV–vis, and FT-IR spectroscopic
methods. An independent reaction of STPPH and [RuÂ(COD)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] led to [Ru<sup>III</sup>(STTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] (<b>5</b>),
which possessed a higher-valent RuÂ(III) center and exhibited good
stability in the solution state. This stability allowed reversible
redox processes in a cyclic voltammetric study. Reactions of [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] (S<sub>2</sub>TTP = 5,10,15,20-tetratolyl-21,23-dithiaporphyrinato)
with AgNO<sub>3</sub> and NaSePh, also via the metathesis strategy,
resulted in novel dithiaporphyrin complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>6</b>) and [Ru<sup>0</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>SePh)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>7</b>), respectively. The structures of <b>6</b> and <b>7</b> were corroborated by X-ray crystallographic analyses. Complex <b>7</b> is an unprecedented ruthenium(0)–dithiaporphyrin
with two <i>bis</i>(phenylseleno)Âmethanes as axial ligands.
A comparison of the analyses of the crude products from reactions
of NaSePh and CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> with or without [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>], further supported by UV–vis spectral
changes under stoichiometric reactions between [RuÂ(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)ÂCl<sub>2</sub>] and NaSePh, suggested a reaction sequence in the order of
(1) formation of a putative [Ru<sup>II</sup>(S<sub>2</sub>TTP)Â(SePh)<sub>2</sub>] intermediate, followed by (2) the concerted formation of
PhSe–CH<sub>2</sub>Cl and simultaneously a reduction of RuÂ(II)
to Ru(0) and finally (3) nucleophilic substitution of PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>Cl by excess PhSe<sup>–</sup>, resulting in PhSeCH<sub>2</sub>SePh, which readily coordinated to the Ru(0) and completed the formation
of <i>bis</i>(phenylseleno)Âmethane complex <b>7</b>