492 research outputs found

    Design and development of a building facade integrated asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic concentrator (BFI-ACP-PV)

    Get PDF
    © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Building Integrated PV and Concentrating PV can generate electricity onsite and provide savings in materials and electricity costs, as well as protecting buildings from weather. In this paper, a novel truncated stationary asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic concentrator with a geometric concentration ratio of 2.0 has been designed and experimental characterised. The designed system is suitable for building façade application, especially for vertical façade. It has wide acceptance half angles of 0° and 55° this acceptance angle range enables the concentrator to operate year-round at its geometric gain in most of the UK and EU climatic condition. A comprehensive indoor test was carried out to evaluate the electrical and thermal characterisation of the developed Building Façade Integrated Asymmetric Compound Parabolic Photovoltaic concentrator (BFI-ACP-PV) system, and also the factors that affect the power output of the developed system. The experimental results showed that the developed BFI-ACP-PV system has the potential to increase the power output per unit solar cell area by a factor of 2, when compared with a non-concentrating PV system. Subsequently, a Phase Change Material (PCM) system was integrated to the rear of the BFI-ACP-PV system to moderate the PV temperature rise and maintain good solar to electrical conversion efficiency. It was found out that the electrical conversion efficiency for the BFI-ACP-PV coupled PCM system was increased by over 5% compared with a similar system with no PCM integrated at the rear, when the incident solar radiation intensity was 280 W/m2, this value increased by over 10% for an incident solar radiation intensity of 670 W/m2

    Exploring the supersymmetric U(1)BL×_{B-L} \times U(1)R_{R} model with dark matter, muon g2g-2 and ZZ^\prime mass limits

    Full text link
    We study the low scale predictions of supersymmetric standard model extended by U(1)BL×U(1)RU(1)_{B-L}\times U(1)_{R} symmetry, obtained from SO(10)SO(10) breaking via a left-right supersymmetric model, imposing universal boundary conditions. Two singlet Higgs fields are responsible for the radiative U(1)BL×U(1)RU(1)_{B-L}\times U(1)_{R} symmetry breaking, and a singlet fermion SS is introduced to generate neutrino masses through inverse seesaw mechanism. The lightest neutralino or sneutrino emerge as dark matter candidates, with different low scale implications. We find that the composition of the neutralino LSP changes considerably depending on the neutralino LSP mass, from roughly half U(1)RU(1)_R bino, half MSSM bino, to singlet higgsino, or completely dominated by MSSM higgsino. The sneutrino LSP is statistically much less likely, and when it occurs it is a 50-50 mixture of right-handed sneutrino and the scalar S~\tilde S. Most of the solutions consistent with the relic density constraint survive the XENON 1T exclusion curve for both LSP cases. We compare the two scenarios and investigate parameter space points and find consistency with the muon anomalous magnetic moment only at the edge of 2σ2\sigma deviation from the measured value. However, we find that the sneutrino LSP solutions could be ruled out completely by strict reinforcement of the recent ZZ^\prime mass bounds. We finally discuss collider prospects for testing the model

    Policy documents for COVID-19 emergency response in China.

    No full text
    Policy documents for COVID-19 emergency response in China.</p

    S1 Dataset -

    No full text
    COVID-19 is a global pandemic. In response to this unprecedented crisis, Chinese government formulated a series of policies. This research is dedicated to exploring the dynamic evolution of China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 in different crisis response stages from a network perspective. First, a three-dimensional analysis framework of “policy subject-policy target-policy instrument” was developed. Then, based on the data sets collected by textual analysis, the dynamic evolution of policy subject, policy target, policy instrument in China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 was discussed by using the method of SNA. This study concluded that the core policy subject, policy instrument, and policy target of China’s response to COVID-19 changed with time. National Health Commission (NHC), Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MHRSS) have important influences in the network of policy subjects. Other subjects are more at the edge of the network, and there are few joint issuances among policy subjects. The study also found that the core policy target was adjusted over time, with phased dynamic characteristics. At the initial stage of China’s response to COVID-19, “reduce infection and mortality” and “steadily carry out economic and social work” were the core policy targets. With the COVID-19 under control, “enterprise development and work resumption” becomes a new core policy target. In addition, this study also revealed the dynamic evolution and unbalanced use of China’s policy instruments in response to COVID-19 in different stages. The combination of policy instruments is mainly composed of “mandatory administration instruments” and “economic incentive instruments”, and supplemented by “health promotion instruments” and “voluntary plan instruments”. These findings may enrich the literature on COVID-19 policy to help researchers understand the dynamics of policy from a network perspective. Moreover, these findings may provide several valuable implications for policymakers and other countries to formulate more effective policies for epidemic response.</div

    Degree centrality (%) measures of policy targets.

    No full text
    COVID-19 is a global pandemic. In response to this unprecedented crisis, Chinese government formulated a series of policies. This research is dedicated to exploring the dynamic evolution of China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 in different crisis response stages from a network perspective. First, a three-dimensional analysis framework of “policy subject-policy target-policy instrument” was developed. Then, based on the data sets collected by textual analysis, the dynamic evolution of policy subject, policy target, policy instrument in China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 was discussed by using the method of SNA. This study concluded that the core policy subject, policy instrument, and policy target of China’s response to COVID-19 changed with time. National Health Commission (NHC), Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MHRSS) have important influences in the network of policy subjects. Other subjects are more at the edge of the network, and there are few joint issuances among policy subjects. The study also found that the core policy target was adjusted over time, with phased dynamic characteristics. At the initial stage of China’s response to COVID-19, “reduce infection and mortality” and “steadily carry out economic and social work” were the core policy targets. With the COVID-19 under control, “enterprise development and work resumption” becomes a new core policy target. In addition, this study also revealed the dynamic evolution and unbalanced use of China’s policy instruments in response to COVID-19 in different stages. The combination of policy instruments is mainly composed of “mandatory administration instruments” and “economic incentive instruments”, and supplemented by “health promotion instruments” and “voluntary plan instruments”. These findings may enrich the literature on COVID-19 policy to help researchers understand the dynamics of policy from a network perspective. Moreover, these findings may provide several valuable implications for policymakers and other countries to formulate more effective policies for epidemic response.</div

    Measurement of policy subjects network in four periods.

    No full text
    Measurement of policy subjects network in four periods.</p

    Research strategy.

    No full text
    COVID-19 is a global pandemic. In response to this unprecedented crisis, Chinese government formulated a series of policies. This research is dedicated to exploring the dynamic evolution of China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 in different crisis response stages from a network perspective. First, a three-dimensional analysis framework of “policy subject-policy target-policy instrument” was developed. Then, based on the data sets collected by textual analysis, the dynamic evolution of policy subject, policy target, policy instrument in China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 was discussed by using the method of SNA. This study concluded that the core policy subject, policy instrument, and policy target of China’s response to COVID-19 changed with time. National Health Commission (NHC), Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MHRSS) have important influences in the network of policy subjects. Other subjects are more at the edge of the network, and there are few joint issuances among policy subjects. The study also found that the core policy target was adjusted over time, with phased dynamic characteristics. At the initial stage of China’s response to COVID-19, “reduce infection and mortality” and “steadily carry out economic and social work” were the core policy targets. With the COVID-19 under control, “enterprise development and work resumption” becomes a new core policy target. In addition, this study also revealed the dynamic evolution and unbalanced use of China’s policy instruments in response to COVID-19 in different stages. The combination of policy instruments is mainly composed of “mandatory administration instruments” and “economic incentive instruments”, and supplemented by “health promotion instruments” and “voluntary plan instruments”. These findings may enrich the literature on COVID-19 policy to help researchers understand the dynamics of policy from a network perspective. Moreover, these findings may provide several valuable implications for policymakers and other countries to formulate more effective policies for epidemic response.</div

    Part of the policy targets/instruments extraction process.

    No full text
    Part of the policy targets/instruments extraction process.</p

    Three-dimensional policy analysis framework.

    No full text
    COVID-19 is a global pandemic. In response to this unprecedented crisis, Chinese government formulated a series of policies. This research is dedicated to exploring the dynamic evolution of China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 in different crisis response stages from a network perspective. First, a three-dimensional analysis framework of “policy subject-policy target-policy instrument” was developed. Then, based on the data sets collected by textual analysis, the dynamic evolution of policy subject, policy target, policy instrument in China’s policy mix in response to COVID-19 was discussed by using the method of SNA. This study concluded that the core policy subject, policy instrument, and policy target of China’s response to COVID-19 changed with time. National Health Commission (NHC), Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MHRSS) have important influences in the network of policy subjects. Other subjects are more at the edge of the network, and there are few joint issuances among policy subjects. The study also found that the core policy target was adjusted over time, with phased dynamic characteristics. At the initial stage of China’s response to COVID-19, “reduce infection and mortality” and “steadily carry out economic and social work” were the core policy targets. With the COVID-19 under control, “enterprise development and work resumption” becomes a new core policy target. In addition, this study also revealed the dynamic evolution and unbalanced use of China’s policy instruments in response to COVID-19 in different stages. The combination of policy instruments is mainly composed of “mandatory administration instruments” and “economic incentive instruments”, and supplemented by “health promotion instruments” and “voluntary plan instruments”. These findings may enrich the literature on COVID-19 policy to help researchers understand the dynamics of policy from a network perspective. Moreover, these findings may provide several valuable implications for policymakers and other countries to formulate more effective policies for epidemic response.</div

    Policy subjects-policy instruments 2-mode network topology diagram.

    No full text
    Policy subjects-policy instruments 2-mode network topology diagram.</p
    corecore