195 research outputs found
A uniform refinement property for congruence lattices
The Congruence Lattice Problem asks whether every algebraic distributive
lattice is isomorphic to the congruence lattice of a lattice. It was hoped that
a positive solution would follow from E. T. Schmidt's construction or from the
approach of P. Pudlak, M. Tischendorf, and J. Tuma. In a previous paper, we
constructed a distributive algebraic lattice with compact
elements that cannot be obtained by Schmidt's construction. In this paper, we
show that the same lattice cannot be obtained using the Pudlak,
Tischendorf, Tuma approach. The basic idea is that every congruence lattice
arising from either method satisfies the Uniform Refinement Property, which is
not satisfied by our example. This yields, in turn, corresponding negative
results about congruence lattices of sectionally complemented lattices and
two-sided ideals of von Neumann regular rings
A -avoiding dimension group with an order-unit of index two
We prove that there exists a dimension group whose positive cone is not
isomorphic to the dimension monoid Dim of any lattice . The dimension
group has an order-unit, and can be taken of any cardinality greater than
or equal to . As to determining the positive cones of dimension
groups in the range of the Dim functor, the bound is optimal. This
solves negatively the problem, raised by the author in 1998, whether any
conical refinement monoid is isomorphic to the dimension monoid of some
lattice. Since has an order-unit of index two, this also solves negatively
a problem raised in 1994 by K.R. Goodearl about representability, with respect
to , of dimension groups with order-unit of index 2 by unit-regular
rings.Comment: To appear in Journal of Algebr
Non-extendability of semilattice-valued measures on partially ordered sets
For a distributive join-semilattice S with zero, a S-valued poset measure on
a poset P is a map m:PxP->S such that m(x,z) <= m(x,y)vm(y,z), and x <= y
implies that m(x,y)=0, for all x,y,z in P. In relation with congruence lattice
representation problems, we consider the problem whether such a measure can be
extended to a poset measure m*:P*xP*->S, for a larger poset P*, such that for
all a,b in S and all x <= y in P*, m*(y,x)=avb implies that there are a
positive integer n and a decomposition x=z\_0 <= z\_1 <= ... <= z\_n=y in P*
such that either m*(z\_{i+1},z\_i) <= a or m*(z\_{i+1},z\_i) <= b, for all i <
n. In this note we prove that this is not possible as a rule, even in case the
poset P we start with is a chain and S has size . The proof uses a
"monotone refinement property" that holds in S provided S is either a lattice,
or countable, or strongly distributive, but fails for our counterexample. This
strongly contrasts with the analogue problem for distances on (discrete) sets,
which is known to have a positive (and even functorial) solution.Comment: 8 pages, Proceedings of AAA 70 -- 70th Workshop on General Algebra,
Vienna University of Technology (May 26--29, 2005), to appea
Gcd-monoids arising from homotopy groupoids
The interval monoid (P) of a poset P is defined by generators [x,
y], where x y in P , and relations [x, x] = 1, [x, z] = [x, y]
[y, z] for x y z. It embeds into its universal group
(P), the interval group of P , which is also the universal group of the
homotopy groupoid of the chain complex of P. We prove the following results:
The monoid (P) has finite left and right greatest common
divisors of pairs (we say that it is a gcd-monoid) iff every principal ideal
(resp., filter) of P is a join-semilattice (resp., a meet-semilattice).
For every group G, there is a poset P of length 2 such that
(P) is a gcd-monoid and G is a free factor of (P) by
a free group. Moreover, P can be taken finite iff G is finitely presented.
For every finite poset P , the monoid (P) can be embedded
into a free monoid. Some of the results above, and many related ones,
can be extended from interval monoids to the universal monoid Umon(S) of any
category S. This enables us, in particular, to characterize the embeddability
of Umon(S) into a group, by stating that it holds at the hom-set level. We thus
obtain new easily verified sufficient conditions for embeddability of a monoid
into a group. We illustrate our results by various examples and
counterexamples.Comment: 27 pages (v4). Semigroup Forum, to appea
Semilattices of finitely generated ideals of exchange rings with finite stable rank
We find a distributive (v, 0, 1)-semilattice S of size that is
not isomorphic to the maximal semilattice quotient of any Riesz monoid endowed
with an order-unit of finite stable rank. We thus obtain solutions to various
open problems in ring theory and in lattice theory. In particular: - There is
no exchange ring (thus, no von Neumann regular ring and no C*-algebra of real
rank zero) with finite stable rank whose semilattice of finitely generated,
idempotent-generated two-sided ideals is isomorphic to S. - There is no locally
finite, modular lattice whose semilattice of finitely generated congruences is
isomorphic to S. These results are established by constructing an infinitary
statement, denoted here by URPsr, that holds in the maximal semilattice
quotient of every Riesz monoid endowed with an order-unit of finite stable
rank, but not in the semilattice S
Sublattices of complete lattices with continuity conditions
Various embedding problems of lattices into complete lattices are solved. We
prove that for any join-semilattice S with the minimal join-cover refinement
property, the ideal lattice IdS of S is both algebraic and dually algebraic.
Furthermore, if there are no infinite D-sequences in J(S), then IdS can be
embedded into a direct product of finite lower bounded lattices. We also find a
system of infinitary identities that characterize sublattices of complete,
lower continuous, and join-semidistributive lattices. These conditions are
satisfied by any (not necessarily finitely generated) lower bounded lattice and
by any locally finite, join-semidistributive lattice. Furthermore, they imply
M. Ern\'e's dual staircase distributivity. On the other hand, we prove that the
subspace lattice of any infinite-dimensional vector space cannot be embedded
into any countably complete, countably upper continuous, and countably lower
continuous lattice. A similar result holds for the lattice of all order-convex
subsets of any infinite chain.Comment: To appear in Algebra Universali
Cevian operations on distributive lattices
We construct a completely normal bounded distributive lattice D in which for
every pair (a, b) of elements, the set {x D | a b x} has a
countable coinitial subset, such that D does not carry any binary operation -
satisfying the identities x y (x-y),(x-y)(y-x) = 0, and x-z
(x-y)(y-z). In particular, D is not a homomorphic image of the
lattice of all finitely generated convex {\ell}-subgroups of any (not
necessarily Abelian) {\ell}-group. It has \lambda\infty\lambda$-elementary equivalence.Comment: 23 pages. v2 removes a redundancy from the definition of a Cevian
operation in v1.In Theorem 5.12, Idc should be replaced by Csc (especially on
the G side
- …