Extraosseous Osteosarcoma of the Esophagus: A Case Report

Extraosseous osteosarcoma (EOO) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm that is located in the soft tissues without direct attachment to the skeletal system and that produces osteoid, bone, or chondroid material. EOO is an extremely rare disease, accounting for only 1% of soft tissue sarcomas, and typically presents in either an extremity or the retroperitoneum. This paper presents the case of a 45-year-old Caucasian male with extraosseous osteosarcoma of the esophagus

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Oligometastatic Lung Nodules: A Single Institution Series

Aim: Lung metastases from an extra-pulmonary origin occasionally present with a limited metastatic disease burden. In cases where metastatectomy is not feasible, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents a non-invasive, efficacious option. We report the outcomes of patients treated with lung SBRT in cases of limited metastatic disease.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 44 patients with 50 lung nodules from various extra-pulmonary malignancies treated with SBRT. Fifty percent of the patients were male and median age was 64. The median number of nodules was 1 and 90% of patients had oligometastatic disease. Thirty-four percent of patients had extra-thoracic disease.Results: Fifty lung nodules were treated with SBRT in 44 patients. Median dose was 48 Gy in 5 fractions with a median biological effective dose (BED) of 100 Gy10. Follow-up imaging was available for review in 96% of nodules. Median follow-up was 17.5 months. One year local control was 82%. BED >72 Gy10 predicted improved local control (90 vs. 57% at 1 year). One year overall survival following SBRT was 66%. There was no difference in overall survival if patients had extra-thoracic disease.Conclusion: Lung SBRT is a safe, effective tool for treatment of limited lung metastases. Dose selection remains important for local control

Cancer Stem Cell Chemotherapeutics Assay for Prospective Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma and Progressive Anaplastic Glioma: A Single-Institution Case Series

© 2020 BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSC) may lead to tumor recurrence in glioblastoma (GBM). The poor prognosis of this disease emphasizes the critical need for developing a treatment stratification system to improve outcomes through personalized medicine. METHODS: We present a case series of 12 GBM and 2 progressive anaplastic glioma cases from a single Institution prospectively treated utilizing a CSC chemotherapeutics assay (ChemoID) guided report. All patients were eligible to receive a stereotactic biopsy and thus undergo ChemoID testing. We selected one of the most effective treatments based on the ChemoID assay report from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapy as monotherapy or their combinations for our patients. Patients were evaluated by MRI scans and response was assessed according to RANO 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Of the 14 cases reviewed, the median age of our patient cohort was 49 years (21–63). We observed 6 complete responses (CR) 43%, 6 partial responses (PR) 43%, and 2 progressive diseases (PD) 14%. Patients treated with ChemoID assay-directed therapy, in combination with other modality of treatment (RT, LITT), had a longer median overall survival (OS) of 13.3 months (5.4-NA), compared to the historical median OS of 9.0 months (8.0–10.8 months) previously reported. Notably, patients with recurrent GBM or progressive high-grade glioma treated with assay-guided therapy had a 57% probability to survive at 12 months, compared to the 27% historical probability of survival observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here suggest that the ChemoID Assay has the potential to stratify individualized chemotherapy choices to improve recurrent and progressive high-grade glioma patient survival. Importance of the Study: Glioblastoma (GBM) and progressive anaplastic glioma are the most aggressive brain tumor in adults and their prognosis is very poor even if treated with the standard of care chemoradiation Stupp\u27s protocol. Recent knowledge pointed out that current treatments often fail to successfully target cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are responsible for therapy resistance and recurrence of these malignant tumors. ChemoID is the first and only CLIA (clinical laboratory improvements amendment) -certified and CAP (College of American Pathologists) -accredited chemotherapeutic assay currently available in oncology clinics that examines patient\u27s derived CSCs susceptibility to conventional FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) -approved drugs. In this study we observed that although the majority of our patients (71.5%) presented with unfavorable prognostic predictors (wild type IDH-1/2 and unmethylated MGMT promoter), patients treated with ChemoID assay-directed therapy had an overall response rate of 86% and increased median OS of 13.3 months compared to the historical median OS of 9.1 months (8.1–10.1 months) previously reported [1] suggesting that the ChemoID assay may be beneficial in personalizing treatment strategies

Treatment trends in brain metastases from testicular cancer in the United States

Aim: We utilized the National Cancer Database to describe the treatment trends in brain metastases from primary testicular cancers. Methods: We analyzed data from the NCDB from 2010 to 2015 for patients with both primary testicular cancers and brain metastases who were treated with brain-directed radiation. We performed multivariable logistic and cox regressions to identify predictors of treatment type and overall survival respectively. Results: Most patients meeting the above criteria received whole brain radiation therapy as opposed to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Predictors of improved survival were age, private insurance coverage, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of SRS. The 5-year survival rate was highest for patients who received SRS. Conclusion: This study confirms significantly improved overall survival with the use of SRS

A 58-Year-Old Woman with Left-Sided Weakness and a History of a Pediatric Brain Tumor: A Case Report

Background: An uncommon but well-established complication of cranial irradiation is secondary neoplasm. This case presentation documents a radiation-induced malignant glioma 55 years after being diagnosed with “cerebral sarcoma,” now defined as atypical meningioma. This not only represents the longest reported latency period for a patient initially receiving over 30 Gy, but also provides a valuable historical perspective of neuro-oncology. Clinical Presentation: A 58-year-old female presenting with progressive left-sided upper and lower extremity weakness with a past medical history significant for “cerebral sarcoma” was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme. This patient had previously been treated with resection and adjuvant radiation therapy via a 280-kVP orthovoltage machine and received 3,390 rad to the posterior three-quarters of the skull for “cerebral sarcoma.” Conclusion: A comprehensive investigation of the past medical history helped uncover a mysterious pediatric diagnosis, helped drive the management 5 decades later, and serves as a reminder that seemingly safe interventions may still cause harm

Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis secondary to gynecologic malignancies: A single institution series examining outcomes of a rare entity

Objective: The use of SRS and fSRT to determine overall survival, tumor control, and local-disease free progression in patient diagnosed with gynecologic brain metastasis. Methods: In this retrospective review, 11 patients aged 50 to 85 (median age of 71) were treated with linear accelerator-based SRS and hypofractionated SRT for brain metastasis secondary to gynecologic malignancies. In total, 16 tumors were treated from 2007 to 2017. Patients were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range 15 to 30 Gy) in 3 Fx (range 1 to 5). Median follow-up from SRS or SRT was 4 months (range 3–38 months). Results: The actuarial 1-year overall survival rate was 26% with a median overall survival of 8 months. In addition, 1-year actuarial local control rate was 83.3% and the 1-year distant brain control rate was 31%. One patient experienced toxicity that presented as seizures after 7 months (due to minimal edema) that required anticonvulsants. There was no other acute or late treatment-related toxicity.Conclusion: Linear-accelerator based SRS or fSRT is safe and effective for control of local tumor growth in brain metastases secondary to gynecologic malignancies. The course of disease remains aggressive as seen by poor overall survival and distant failure rate. Keywords: Gynecologic oncology, Brain metastases, Radiosurger

Prescription dose and fractionation predict improved survival after stereotactic radiotherapy for brainstem metastases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Brainstem metastases represent an uncommon clinical presentation that is associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment options are limited given the unacceptable risks associated with surgical resection in this location. However, without local control, symptoms including progressive cranial nerve dysfunction are frequently observed. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes associated with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) of brainstem metastases.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively reviewed 38 tumors in 36 patients treated with SRT/SRS between February 2003 and December 2011. Treatment was delivered with the Cyberknife™ or Trilogy™ radiosurgical systems. The median age of patients was 62 (range: 28–89). Primary pathologies included 14 lung, 7 breast, 4 colon and 11 others. Sixteen patients (44%) had received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) prior to SRT/SRS; ten had received prior SRT/SRS at a different site (28%). The median tumor volume was 0.94 cm³ (range: 0.01-4.2) with a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (range: 12–24) delivered in 1–5 fractions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Median follow-up for the cohort was 3.2 months (range: 0.4-20.6). Nineteen patients (52%) had an MRI follow-up available for review. Of these, one patient experienced local failure corresponding to an actuarial 6-month local control of 93%. Fifteen of the patients with available follow-up imaging (79%) experienced intracranial failure outside of the treatment volume. The median time to distant intracranial failure was 2.1 months. Six of the 15 patients with distant intracranial failure (40%) had received previous WBRT. The actuarial overall survival rates at 6- and 12-months were 27% and 8%, respectively. Predictors of survival included Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score, greater number of treatment fractions, and higher prescription dose. Three patients experienced acute treatment-related toxicity consisting of nausea (n = 1) and headaches (n = 2) that resolved with a short-course of dexamethasone.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>SRT/SRS for brainstem metastases is safe and achieves a high rate of local control. We found higher GPA as well as greater number of treatment fractions and higher prescription dose to be correlated with improved overall survival. Despite this approach, prognosis remains poor and distant intracranial control remains an issue, even in patients previously treated with WBRT.</p