Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microcopy of Extravasating Cancer Cells in the Mouse Microenvironment

Objective. To determine (i) whether early viral kinetics or other markers during a modified treatment regimen are predictors of treatment outcome and (ii) whether fast responders can be treated for 24 weeks, without compromising the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate. Material and methods. One hundred "difficult-to-treat'' chronic hepatitis C patients (46 previous non-responders/relapsers (any genotype), 54 treatment-naive patients genotypes 1 and 4) were treated with triple antiviral induction therapy: amantadine hydrochloride and ribavirin, combined with 6 weeks interferon alfa-2b induction (weeks 1-2: 18 MU/day, weeks 3-4: 9 MU/day, weeks 5-6: 6 MU/day), thereafter combined with weekly peginterferon alfa-2b. Fast responders (>= 3 log(10) HCV RNA decline at week 4) were randomized to 24 or 48 weeks. Slow responders (= or = 5 IU/mL at week 16 became non-SVR. In previous non-responders/relapsers, the predictive value for SVR was 83% if HCV RNA was = 5 IU/mL at week 8 became non-SVR. Conclusions. With high-dose interferon induction, SVR and non-SVR can be predicted reliably within 16 weeks. Fast responders can be treated for 24 weeks, and SVR is independent of baseline viral load in fast responders

Retreatment of hepatitis C non-responsive to Interferon. A placebo controlled randomized trial of Ribavirin monotherapy versus combination therapy with Ribavirin and Interferon in 121 patients in the Benelux [ISRCTN53821378]

BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine depends on unbiased selection of completed randomized controlled trials. For completeness it is important to publish all trials. This report describes the first large randomised controlled trial where combination therapy was compared to placebo therapy and to ribavirin monotherapy, which has not been published untill now. METHODS: One hundred and twenty one patients with chronic hepatitis C and elevated transaminases who did not respond to previous treatment with standard interferon monotherapy, were included from 16 centers in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg between 1992 and 1996. Patient poor-response characteristics were: genotype 1 (69%), HCV RNA above 2 × 10(6 )copies/ml (55%) and cirrhosis (38%). Patients were randomized to 6 months combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b (3 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg / day), 6 months ribavirin monotherapy (1000–1200 mg / day) or 6 months ribavirin placebo. The study was double blinded for the ribavirin / placebo component. One patient did not fit the entry criteria, and 3 did not start. All 117 patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HCV RNA was undetectable in 35% of patients on combination therapy and in none of the patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy or placebo. The sustained virological response rate at 6 months after therapy was 15% for patients treated with interferon and ribavirin. During the 6 months treatment period 13% of patients on interferon ribavirin combination therapy, 13% of patients on ribavirin monotherapy and 11% of patients on placebo withdrew due to side effects or noncompliance. At 24 weeks of treatment the mean Hb level was 85% of the baseline value, which means a mean decrease from 9.1 mmol/l to 7.8 mmol/l. The Hb levels at the end of treatment were not significantly different from patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy (p = 0.76). End of treatment WBC was significantly lower in patients treated with combination therapy, compared to ribavirin (p < 0.01) as well as for patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy compared to placebo (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: This belated report on the only placebo controlled study of interferon ribavirin combination therapy in non responders to standard doses of interferon monotherapy documents the effectiveness, be it limited, of this approach as well as the dynamics of the effects on blood counts

Common Bile Duct Dilatation in Drug Users With Chronic Hepatitis C Is Associated With Current Methadone Use

Objectives: Dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) can be an ominous sign for malignancy of the pancreatobiliary tract; however, it has also been described as a presumably harmless side effect of opioid use. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of CBD dilatation among drug users receiving methadone maintenance therapy in the Netherlands. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a prospectively studied and well-defined cohort of drug users with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, attending the Public Health Service of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography as part of pretreatment screening. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze potential demographic and drug use-related determinants of radiological CBD dilatation. Results: Between September 2004 and December 2011, 222 hepatitis C virus-infected drug users were evaluated. Dilatation of the CBD was found in 50 of 222 patients (22.5%), with a median diameter of 8.0 mm (interquartile range, 7.0 to 10.0; n = 43). Dilatation was associated with current use of methadone (adjusted odds ratio = 20.50; 95% confidence interval, 2.79 to 2.61 x 10(3)), independent of the current methadone dose, and with age per 10-year increase (adjusted odds ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 2.71). Regular use of heroin in the 6 months before ultrasonography was not found to be associated with dilatation. Conclusions: Dilatation of the CBD is common in drug users under methadone treatment and seems to be a harmless side effect of opioid agonist

Low incidence of reinfection with the hepatitis C virus following treatment in active drug users in Amsterdam

Background More than two-thirds of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are associated with injecting drug use. Despite the wide availability of standard treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, active drug users (DU) have limited access to HCV treatment. Physicians may be reluctant to prescribe treatment because of the presumed high risk of reinfection. However, data on reinfection in treated DU remain scarce. Methods Active DU with chronic HCV infection were treated in a multidisciplinary setting. After achieving a sustained virologic response, patients were tested at 6-12-monthly intervals for HCV RNA. To distinguish between relapse and reinfection, sequence and phylogenetic analyses were performed on the NS5B region of the HCV genome. The incidence of reinfection was calculated using person-time techniques. Results From April 2005 to March 2010, 69 active DU treated for HCV had sufficient follow-up, median 2.5 years (interquartile range, 1.6-3.7). Sustained virologic response was achieved in 42 patients (61%). During follow-up, 41 patients remained HCV RNA-negative; of these, two patients died. During treatment, five out of 41 injected drugs, which increased to 11 out of 41 after the end of treatment. One case of reinfection was observed, followed by spontaneous clearance of the virus. The overall incidence was 0.76/100 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.04-3.73). For only those individuals reporting injecting drug use, the incidence was 3.42/100 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.17-16.90). Conclusion We report a low incidence of HCV reinfection following treatment in DU participating in a multidisciplinary programme. Active drug use, including injecting, should not preclude access to treatment for HCV. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24: 1302-1307 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkin

Is adding HCV screening to the antenatal national screening program in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, cost-effective?

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to severe liver disease. Pregnant women are already routinely screened for several infectious diseases, but not yet for HCV infection. Here we examine whether adding HCV screening to routine screening is cost-effective. METHODS: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of implementing HCV screening of all pregnant women and HCV screening of first-generation non-Western pregnant women as compared to no screening, we developed a Markov model. For the parameters of the model, we used prevalence data from pregnant women retrospectively tested for HCV in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and from literature sources. In addition, we estimated the effect of possible treatment improvement in the future. RESULTS: The incremental costs per woman screened was €41 and 0.0008 life-years were gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €52,473 which is above the cost-effectiveness threshold of €50,000. For screening first-generation non-Western migrants, the ICER was €47,113. Best-case analysis for both scenarios showed ICERs of respectively €19,505 and €17,533. We estimated that if costs per treatment were to decline to €3,750 (a reduction in price of €31,000), screening all pregnant women would be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, adding HCV screening to the already existing screening program for pregnant women is not cost-effective for women in general. However, adding HCV screening for first-generation non-Western women shows a modest cost-effective outcome. Yet, best case analysis shows potentials for an ICER below €20,000 per life-year gained. Treatment options will improve further in the coming years, enhancing cost-effectiveness even more

Antiviral activity of telaprevir (VX-950) and peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with hepatitis C

Telaprevir (VX-950), an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease, substantially decreased plasma HCV RNA levels in a prior clinical study. The present study evaluated viral kinetics and safety during dosing with telaprevir alone and in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a for 14 days. Previously untreated patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C were randomized to receive placebo and peginterferon alfa-2a (n = 4); telaprevir (n = 8); or telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a (n = 8). Telaprevir was given as 750 mg oral doses every 8 hours; peginterferon alfa-2a was given as weekly 180 mug subcutaneous injections. The median change in HCV RNA from baseline to day 15 was -1.09 log(10) (range, -2.08 to -0.46) in the placebo and peginterferon alfa-2a group; -3.99 log(10) (range, -5.28 to -1.26) in the telaprevir group, and -5.49 log(10) (range, -6.54 to -4.30) in the telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a group. Day 15 HCV RNA levels were undetectable in 4 patients who received telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and in 1 patient who received telaprevir alone. No viral breakthrough occurred in patients who received telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a. The majority of adverse events were mild. There were no serious adverse events or premature discontinuations. Twelve weeks after starting off-study standard therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in all 8 patients in the telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a group, 5 patients in the telaprevir group, and 1 patient in the placebo and peginterferon alfa-2a group. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the substantial antiviral effects of telaprevir and showed an increased antiviral effect of telaprevir combined with peginterferon alfa-2

Low-level HCV viraemia after initial response during antiviral therapy: transcription-mediated amplification predicts treatment failure

BACKGROUND: In chronic hepatitis C patients with an initial virological response (IVR) during antiviral therapy (that is, HCV RNA becomes negative before week 16 of treatment) the significance of reappearing viraemia below the detection limit of PCR is not known. We studied this phenomenon in subsets of patients. METHODS: We assessed HCV RNA at weeks 16 and 20 of therapy by PCR and by more sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) in 23 patients with breakthrough or relapse and in 34 patients with sustained virological response (SVR). All patients participated in a high-dose-interferon induction study for difficult-to-treat patients. Therapy consisted of amantadine hydrochloride and ribavirin, combined with interferon-alpha2b induction during the first 6 weeks and thereafter combined with weekly pegylated interferon-alpha2b. RESULTS: Among the 57 IVR patients, we detected transient or persistent reappearance of low levels of HCV RNA in 10 of the 23 (43%) patients with eventual breakthrough or relapse; but in none of the 34 SVR patients. In 5 of 10 patients reappearing HCV RNA was only detectable by TMA. CONCLUSION: Reappearance of low levels of HCV RNA in patients with IVR predicts treatment failur

High incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus during or shortly after treatment with pegylated interferon alpha for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Development of diabetes mellitus (DM) during or shortly after treatment with interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been reported sporadically. We prospectively screened for DM during and after IFN-alpha therapy for chronic HCV infection. METHODS: Blood glucose levels of patients with chronic HCV infection were routinely assessed at all outpatient visits during and after treatment with pegylated-IFN-alpha (Peg-IFN-alpha) and ribavirin (Riba). RESULTS: Between December 2002 and October 2005, 189 non-diabetic patients were treated with Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba, of whom five developed type 1 DM (2.6%), three type 2 DM (1.6%) and one an indeterminate type of DM. Classical symptoms of DM were present in three patients who developed DM shortly after cessation of Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba. In the other patients, symptoms of DM were either indistinguishable from side effects caused by Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba or absent. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a high incidence of type 1 DM during Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba therapy for chronic HCV infection. Symptoms of DM may be absent or mistaken for Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba-associated side effects. To diagnose DM without delay, we propose routine assessment of blood glucose at all outpatient visits during and after Peg-IFN-alpha/Riba treatment in chronic HCV patient

Inflammatory markers neopterin and alanine aminotransferase in HCV patients treated with HCV NS3.4A protease inhibitor telaprevir (VX-950) and/or peginterferon alfa-2a

OBJECTIVE: Neopterin is a marker of monocyte/macrophage activity. Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) is a marker of hepatocyte injury. The aim of this study was to determine changes in neopterin and ALAT levels, as markers of inflammation, in two ancillary studies during two-phase 1b trials of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3.4A protease inhibitor telaprevir (VX-950), with or without peginterferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four chronic hepatitis C patients (genotype 1) received placebo or telaprevir, with or without Peg-IFN, for 14 days in two multiple-dose studies. RESULTS: During administration of telaprevir, every patient demonstrated a >2-log decrease in HCV RNA. Mean neopterin and ALAT levels decreased in all four groups receiving telaprevir alone. In contrast, mean neopterin levels increased and ALAT levels decreased in the Peg-IFN plus telaprevir and Peg-IFN plus placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with an HCV NS3.4A protease inhibitor ameliorates inflammation. The increase in neopterin levels and the decrease in ALAT levels during administration of Peg-IFN with or without telaprevir are in accordance with earlier observations showing that IFN reduces hepatocyte injury but increases monocyte/macrophage activity. The IFN-mediated immunomodulatory effects appear to remain intact when IFN is combined with telaprevi

Evaluation of persistence of resistant variants with ultra-deep pyrosequencing in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with telaprevir.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Telaprevir, a hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitor has significantly improved sustained viral response rates when given in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, compared with current standard of care in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infected patients. In patients with a failed sustained response, the emergence of drug-resistant variants during treatment has been reported. It is unclear to what extent these variants persist in untreated patients. The aim of this study was to assess using ultra-deep pyrosequencing, whether after 4 years follow-up, the frequency of resistant variants is increased compared to pre-treatment frequencies following 14 days of telaprevir treatment. METHODS: Fifteen patients from 2 previous telaprevir phase 1 clinical studies (VX04-950-101 and VX05-950-103) were included. These patients all received telaprevir monotherapy for 14 days, and 2 patients subsequently received standard of care. Variants at previously well-characterized NS3 protease positions V36, T54, R155 and A156 were assessed at baseline and after a follow-up of 4±1.2 years by ultra-deep pyrosequencing. The prevalence of resistant variants at follow-up was compared to baseline. RESULTS: Resistance associated mutations were detectable at low frequency at baseline. In general, prevalence of resistance mutations at follow-up was not increased compared to baseline. Only one patient had a small, but statistically significant, increase in the number of V36M and T54S variants 4 years after telaprevir-dosing. CONCLUSION: In patients treated for 14 days with telaprevir monotherapy, ultra-deep pyrosequencing indicates that long-term persistence of resistant variants is rare