25 research outputs found

    Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patients with non–ST elevation acute myocardial infarction

    Get PDF
    AbstractOBJECTIVESTo compare short- and long-term outcome after early invasive or conservative strategies in the treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI).BACKGROUNDIt is uncertain whether or not there is benefit from emergent invasive diagnosis and treatment of AMI in patients without ST segment elevation on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG).METHODSIn a cohort of 1,635 consecutive patients with AMI who presented to hospitals without ST segment elevation on their admission ECG, we compared treatments, hospital course and outcome in 308 patients who presented to hospitals whose initial strategy favored early angiography and appropriate intervention when indicated versus 1,327 similar patients who presented to hospitals that favor a more conservative initial approach.RESULTSAt baseline, patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy were younger, more predominately Caucasian and had less comorbidity. Early coronary angiography occurred in 58.8% versus 8% (p < 0.001), and early angioplasty was performed in 44.8% versus 6.1% (p < 0.001) in the two different cohorts. Patients treated in hospitals favoring the early invasive strategy had a lower 30-day (5.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.026) and four-year mortality (20% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a trend towards lower hospital mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.09) and a significant lower long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.80) in patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy.CONCLUSIONSThese data suggested that an early invasive strategy in patients with AMI and nondiagnostic ECG changes is associated with lower long-term mortality

    Influence of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent outcome of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe effect of coronary bypass surgery on recurrent cardiac arrest was estimated in 265 patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest between 1970 and 1988. From this cohort, 85 patients (32%) underwent coronary bypass surgery after recovery from cardiac arrest and 180 patients (68%) were treated medically. A multivariate Cox analysis was used to estimate the effect of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent survival after adjusting for effects of age, prior cardiac history, ejection fraction, year of the event, history of angina, antiarrhythmic drug use and whether the arrest was related to acute myocardial infarction.The use of coronary bypass surgery had a significant effect in reducing the incidence of subsequent cardiac arrest daring follow-up study (risk ratio [RR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.97, p < 0.04). There was also a trend consistent with a reduction in total cardiac mortality (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.10, p = 0.10). These findings suggest that coronary bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of sudden death in suitable patients resuscitated from an episode of ventricular fibrillation
    corecore