41 research outputs found

    SEE ME - Sociale inclusie en zinvol ouder worden in Europa:Zes goede praktijken in de Ouderenzorg

    Get PDF
    Transities in de zorg hebben in veel Europese landen geleid tot een ‘persoonsgerichte’ benadering waarbij de persoon achter de zorgbehoevende oudere centraal staat. Het Europese SEE ME project bestudeert hoe deze persoonsgerichte zorg vorm kan krijgen in concrete zorgpraktijken. Dit kwalitatief onderzoek laat zien welke innoverende principes daarin een rol kunnen spelen en hoe deze in de zorgorganisatie worden geborgd

    Calendar Interviewing and the Use of Landmark Events – Implications for Cross-cultural Surveys

    Get PDF
    This paper discusses potential methodological issues in the design and implementation of calendar recall aids such as the Life History Calendar for cross-cultural surveys. More specifically, it aims to provide insights into how the use of landmark events in calendar interviewing may be influenced by cross-cultural variability. As an example, we compare the landmark events reported by Dutch and American respondents in two studies in which calendar recall aids were used. The study discusses differences that were found between the two countries in the numbers and types of reported landmark events, as well as in the temporal distribution of those events. The outcomes suggest that it is important for researchers to examine how landmark events in calendar instruments translate in diverse cultural contexts. Des entretiens par calendrier et utilisation d’évĂ©nements marquants – Implications pour les enquĂȘtes transculturelles : Cette note traite des questions mĂ©thodologiques potentielles dans la conception et la mise en oeuvre des aides de rappel par calendrier tels que le Calendrier Histoire de vie pour les enquĂȘtes transculturelles. Plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment, elle vise Ă  fournir des indications sur comment l’utilisation des Ă©vĂ©nements marquants dans des entretiens par calendrier peut ĂȘtre influencĂ©e par la variabilitĂ© interculturelle. À titre d’exemple, nous comparons les Ă©vĂ©nements marquants rapportĂ©s par les rĂ©pondants nĂ©erlandais et amĂ©ricains dans deux Ă©tudes dans lesquelles des aides de rappel par calendrier ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es. L’étude examine les diffĂ©rences qui ont Ă©tĂ© trouvĂ©es entre les deux pays dans le nombre et les types d’évĂ©nements marquants rapportĂ©s, ainsi que dans la distribution temporelle de ces Ă©vĂ©nements. Les rĂ©sultats suggĂšrent qu’il est important pour les chercheurs d’examiner comment des Ă©vĂ©nements dans des calendriers se traduisent dans divers contextes culturels

    Students’ academic engagement during COVID-19 times:a mixed-methods study into relatedness and loneliness during the pandemic

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 outbreak forced higher education students to study online-only. Previous research indicates that forced solitude or loneliness can cause a variety of problems for students, among which is reduced academic engagement. The Basic Psychological Needs Theory, a sub-theory of Self-Determination Theory, relates academic engagement to three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence and relatedness), whereas varying theories on loneliness highlight the complexities of engaging in a learning environment whilst feeling lonely. As university staff members have been struggling to keep students on task since the COVID-19 outbreak, the need arose for more knowledge about to what extent students have felt lonely, frustrated or satisfied in their need for relatedness and to what extent this affected their academic engagement. A convergent Mixed Methods research study was conducted among university students (N =  228) and an online questionnaire was administered to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. A series of multiple hierarchical regression analyses were performed, considering demographic characteristics, to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative data was coded using a hybrid approach of deductive and inductive coding. Themes were generated that depicted in-depth issues of relatedness, loneliness, and academic engagement. Quantitative analysis demonstrated the importance for academic engagement of both (a) ‘basic need satisfaction and frustration’ of relatedness in life and in ‘social study context’, and (b) feeling (emotionally) lonely. The negative impact of frustration of relatedness seemed to be dominant but also overlapped with the effects of loneliness. The qualitative outcomes support and complement these quantitative results. The results showed that students’ academic engagement suffered from the loss of a shared physical space and from uncertainty about university policies. For a minority of students, however, the relief from social obligations that came along with social distancing was a blessing in disguise

    SEE ME - Sociale inclusie en zinvol ouder worden in Europa:Zes goede praktijken in de Ouderenzorg

    Get PDF
    Transities in de zorg hebben in veel Europese landen geleid tot een ‘persoonsgerichte’ benadering waarbij de persoon achter de zorgbehoevende oudere centraal staat. Het Europese SEE ME project bestudeert hoe deze persoonsgerichte zorg vorm kan krijgen in concrete zorgpraktijken. Dit kwalitatief onderzoek laat zien welke innoverende principes daarin een rol kunnen spelen en hoe deze in de zorgorganisatie worden geborgd

    SEE ME - ZIE de persoon achter de zorgbehoevende oudere

    Get PDF
    Ouderdom wordt vaak gezien als een levensfase die gekenmerkt wordt door achteruitgang in fysieke en mentale gezondheid. De meeste zorg is daarom gericht op medische aspecten. Maar ouderen hebben ook behoefte aan ondersteuning op het gebied van sociale contacten en zingeving. Wat zeggen ouderen zelf over deze behoeften? In een kwalitatief Europees onderzoek komen zij zelf aan het woord en schetsen zij een breder beeld van de zorgbehoevende oudere

    SEE ME - ZIE de persoon achter de zorgbehoevende oudere

    Get PDF
    Ouderdom wordt vaak gezien als een levensfase die gekenmerkt wordt door achteruitgang in fysieke en mentale gezondheid. De meeste zorg is daarom gericht op medische aspecten. Maar ouderen hebben ook behoefte aan ondersteuning op het gebied van sociale contacten en zingeving. Wat zeggen ouderen zelf over deze behoeften? In een kwalitatief Europees onderzoek komen zij zelf aan het woord en schetsen zij een breder beeld van de zorgbehoevende oudere

    Wooncomplexen voor ouderen: Sociale kwaliteit ontstaat niet vanzelf.

    Get PDF
    Wooncomplexen voor ouderen: sociale kwaliteit ontstaat niet vanzelfDe Nederlandse overheid stimuleert dat ouderen zo lang mogelijk zelfstandig blijven wonen. De meeste ouderen willen dit ook, mits aan bepaalde voorwaarden is voldaan. Ze hebben vooral behoefte aan een levendige woonomgeving waarin ze gemakkelijk kunnen participeren en contacten kunnen leggen. Dit sociale aspect is voor veel mensen een belangrijke reden om naar een wooncomplex voor ouderen te verhuizen. Corporaties concentreren zich echter op fysieke en materiĂ«le aspecten van het wonen; versterking van de sociale kwaliteit wordt aan de bewoners zelf overgelaten.Om inzicht te krijgen in de mogelijkheden van ouderen om de sociale kwaliteit van hun wooncomplex te vergroten, is het experiment “Vitale woongemeenschappen” uitgevoerd in tien wooncomplexen voor ouderen, verspreid over Nederland. Het experiment is geĂ«valueerd middels een (kwantitatieve) nul- en nameting en een kwalitatief onderzoek. Het onderzoek maakt duidelijk dat sociale kwaliteit in een wooncomplex niet vanzelf ontstaat en dat er grenzen zijn aan het zelforganiserende vermogen van bewoners. Hoewel veel bewoners behoefte hebben aan activiteiten en sociale contacten in hun complex, voelen de meesten zich niet in staat om zelf activiteiten te organiseren of bewoners te activeren. Beroepskrachten zijn noodzakelijk om het vitaliseringsproces op gang te brengen en continuĂŻteit te garanderen.  Residential complexes for seniors: social quality does not occur spontaneouslyBackgroundThe Dutch government encourages older people to live independently for as long as possible. Most seniors also prefer to remain self-reliant, provided that certain conditions are met. In particular, they need a lively environment in which they can easily participate in social activities and make social contact. This social aspect is an important incentive for people to move to housing complexes for seniors. Contact with fellow residents and social participation within the housing complex are important determinants for their well-being. However, housing corporations concentrate on the physical and material aspects of housing, while welfare projects and activity guidance are being phased out. Problem statementResidents of housing complexes for seniors are assumed to be capable of developing and maintaining social relations, and social activities are helpful in this regard. Various studies show, however, that opportunities for organizing activities are not evenly distributed among groups of citizens. The self-organizing capacity of residents in complexes with a low socio-economic status remains underdeveloped. Even among individuals with good organizational abilities, these skills decrease as they age or require more care. To gain an insight into the opportunities for older people themselves to increase the social quality of their residential complexes, the “Vital Living Communities” experiment was carried out in ten housing complexes for seniors, spread across the Netherlands. In the experiment, residents and professionals from housing corporations worked together to strengthen their communities using a particular method, named Studio BRUIS. The goal of this intervention was to improve the quality of social interaction in the residential complexes concerned. The research aimed to provide insight into the contribution of older people to improving the quality of social interaction in housing complexes for seniors. Two indicators for the quality of social interaction were defined: 1) social participation (do residents actively participate in social activities?); 2) social solidarity (do residents know each other and feel connected to each other?). MethodsAn evaluation of this experiment was conducted through baseline and follow-up measurements using a questionnaire in combination with qualitative fieldwork. For the purposes of the baseline and follow-up measurements in this research, a standardized questionnaire was developed focusing on the main themes of the experiment. These quantitative measurements provide an overall insight into the quality of social interaction in the ten residential complexes, as well as insight into any changes in the social atmosphere during the experiment. The measurements also reveal the background to the qualitative aspect of the research, in which the researchers had a more intense contact with the residents involved to find out their perspectives on and experiences with the experiment. The combination of in-depth interviews and participant observations provided knowledge about the existing dynamics in the complexes and the extent to which the experiment was aligned with the activity setting. The qualitative study was carried out in four of the ten participating residential complexes and, in addition to participant observations and individual in-depth interviews, documents were analysed and group interviews were carried out.The analysis of the quantitative material focused primarily on those respondents who participated in both the baseline measurement and the post-test. The qualitative material (interview transcripts, “thick descriptions”, reports of group interviews and informal conversations) was encoded and analysed using MaxQda12. The findings were discussed in the focus groups in which residents and professionals from all participating residential complexes took part (“member check”). ConclusionThe research provides insight into the possibilities and limitations of the self-organizing capacity of residents of housing complexes for seniors. The baseline measurement showed that two-thirds of the residents participated in activities in their complex, but that only a few residents were motivated to participate in organizing and managing these activities. This was confirmed by the findings of the qualitative research. The main reasons for residents not becoming active as organizers was their lack of knowledge and organizational skills, thinking of themselves as too old, limitations caused by health problems, and lack of interest in organizing activities for others. Residents who were willing to actively engage in social activities in their residential complex appeared to depend on a facilitating professional to provide ideas, think about implementation and ensure continuity. The professional helped initiate the process, set goals, make plans and implement these, and motivate other residents. But even once activities were up and running, professional support remained necessary because plans often worked out differently in practice. Residents wanted to be able to exchange ideas with someone who could steer the process to some extent and lead them in the right direction. The assistance of professionals was also indispensable when dealing with the resistance or conflicts that inevitably occur during a process of change.The research revealed that social vitalization requires motivated residents who want to act according to the pace and needs of other residents and who appreciate small successes. Strengthening the quality of social interaction also requires harmonization with the cultural context (“activity setting”) of the residential complex. Goals that do not fit the existing situation, or unrealistic plans that never get off the ground, are demotivating. Social vitalization in residential complexes for older adults is a gradual process of change that requires permanent support from active residents and professionals. The self-confidence of the active residents increases when their plans are a success, but this happens in small steps. Professional support is needed to start the vitalization process, to guide and make it sustainable
    corecore