26 research outputs found

    Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Total Ankle Arthroplasty

    No full text
    Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a serious complication that results in significant consequences to the patient and threatens the survival of the ankle replacement. PJI in TAA may require debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer, revision arthroplasty, conversion to arthrodesis, or potentially below the knee amputation. While the practice of TAA has gained popularity in recent years, there is some minimal data regarding wound complications in acute or chronic PJI of TAA. However, of the limited studies that describe complications of PJI of TAA, even fewer studies describe the criteria used in diagnosing PJI. This review will cover the current available literature regarding total ankle arthroplasty infection and will propose a model for treatment options for acute and chronic PJI in TAA. Methods: A review of the current literature was conducted to identify clinical investigations in which prosthetic joint infections occurred in total ankle arthroplasty with associated clinical findings, radiographic imaging, and functional outcomes. The electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published works available through January 31, 2018, of the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were explored using the following search terms and Boolean operators: “total ankle replacement” OR “total ankle arthroplasty” AND “periprosthetic joint infection” AND “diagnosis” OR “diagnostic criteria.” An article was considered eligible for inclusion if it concerned diagnostic criteria of acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection of total ankle arthroplasty regardless of the number of patients treated, type of TAA utilized, conclusion, or level of evidence of study. Results: No studies were found in the review of the literature describing criteria for diagnosing PJI specific to TAA. Conclusions: Literature describing the diagnosis and treatment of PJI in TAA is entirely reliant on the literature surrounding knee and hip arthroplasty. Because of the limited volume of total ankle arthroplasty in comparison to knee and hip arthroplasty, no studies to our knowledge exist describing diagnostic criteria specific to total ankle arthroplasty with associated reliability. Large multicenter trials may be required to obtain the volume necessary to accurately describe diagnostic criteria of PJI specific to TAA. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review

    Comparing the Efficacy of True-Volume Analysis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Computerized Tomography and Conventional Methods of Evaluation in Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Pilot Study.

    No full text
    UNLABELLED: METHODS: With IRB approval, an institutional radiology database was queried for patients with cystic OLT that had undergone and failed microfracture and had compatible CT and MR scans between 2011 and 2016. Five lesions, previously analyzed and described in the literature using CT true-volume, were selected. 10 orthopedic surgeons independently estimated the volume of these 5 OLT via standard MRI. Next, 3D reconstructions were created and morphometric true-volume (MTV) analysis measurements of each OLT were generated. The percent change in volumes from CT and MR was compared based upon MTVs determined from 3D reconstructive analysis. RESULTS: The volume calculated using conventional methods in CT and MR scans grossly overestimated the size by of the OLT by 285-864% and 56-374% respectively when compared to 3D true-volume analysis of those CT and MR scans. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that true-volume is more accurate for calculating lesion size than conventional methods. Additionally, when comparing MRI and CT, thin slice CT true-volume is superior to MRI true-volume. True-volume calculation improves accuracy with CT and MRI and should be recommended for use in revision OLT cases

    Clinical and Kinematic Outcomes Based on Bone Graft Utilization for Salvage First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review

    No full text
    Motion-preserving options for the treatment of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) osteoarthritis are appealing, but the conversion to arthrodesis in failed cases comes with additional challenges. Loss of first ray length may not only lower arthrodesis success rates but can also cause aberrancies in the biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Selection of the proper graft for the restoration of length is crucial in order to minimize the chance of post-operative complications. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the optimal graft type for MTP salvage arthrodesis in terms of clinical outcomes, kinematic outcomes, and bony integration to improve patient care. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until 20 June 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined clinical outcomes, examined different types of bone grafts, discussed impact of bone graft on lengthening, and articles related to first MTP arthrodesis salvage procedures. Data extraction relating to clinical metrics and kinematic metrics was performed and analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare graft types, such as (1) foot and ankle autograft, (2) non-foot and ankle autograft, and (3) allograft. A total of ten articles met eligibility criteria from 180 articles initially retrieved. Included patients (n = 164) had a frequency-weighted mean age of 55.2 ± 4.6 years with a frequency-weighted mean time from primary to salvage procedure of 36.6 ± 21.9 months and a frequency-weighted mean follow-up time of 42.7 ± 17.4 months. The non-foot and ankle autograft group had a mean length restoration of 4.4 ± 0.1 mm (n = 33, 73.3% reported) whereas the allograft group had a mean length restoration of 7.6 ± 3.5 mm (n = 49, 100% reported). The foot and ankle autograft group (n = 12 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 25.0%, the non-foot and ankle autograft group (n = 45 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 53.3%, and the allograft group (n = 49 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 10.2%. Preoperative AOFAS scores were lower but improved postoperatively, with the allograft group showing the highest postoperative scores, shorter time to union, and varying graft lengths among different autograft subgroups. The allograft group for salvage MTP arthrodesis has promise, as this group had the greatest mean length restoration and the lowest complication rate. This is the first systematic review examining different bone graft utilization for salvage MTP arthrodesis. More high-quality research is needed before solid recommendations can be made on this topic
    corecore