L arthrose du poignet dans les SLAC, SNAC et SCAC (nouvelle classification arthro-tomodensitométrique et étude comparative des arthrodèses 4 os et 3 os)

PARIS7-Xavier Bichat (751182101) / SudocSudocFranceF

Radiocapitate Congruency as a Predictive Factor for the Results of Proximal Row Carpectomy

International audienc

Combined Treatment of Wrist and Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis

International audienceBackground Combined thumb basal and wrist joint arthritis (excluding scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis) is rare considering the frequency of arthritis of either joint alone. Combined surgical treatment has never been described in the literature. Furthermore, the scaphoidectomy common to all interventions for Watson stage 2 or 3 wrist arthritis theoretically makes it impossible to perform a trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthritis. Question/Purpose The aim of this study was to present and analyze the results of two types of surgical treatment when both wrist and thumb arthritis was present. Materials and Methods Our retrospective series included 11 patients suffering from Eaton Stage III thumb basal joint arthritis and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) II and III-type wrist arthritis. Five patients (group A) underwent trapeziectomy and palliative surgery for their wrist with conservation of the distal pole of the scaphoid (one proximal row carpectomy [PRC] and four four-corner fusions), and six (group B) patients had a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty either with PRC (two cases) or four-corner arthrodesis (four cases) including total scaphoidectomy. Results The mean follow-up was 57 months. The overall visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 1.5 at rest, with no difference between the trapeziectomy and arthroplasty groups. The average Kapandji score was 9.3 (9 in group A and 9.5 in group B). The flexion/extension range of motion for the wrist was 64° following four-corner arthrodesis and 75° following PRC. Only one case of algodystrophy was observed. The radiological analysis revealed no complications. Discussion This study shows that thumb basal joint arthritis and SLAC type wrist arthritis may be treated by combined treatment during the same intervention without any complications. The results of palliative surgery for the wrist, either with trapeziectomy or with a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty, are comparable. With a trapeziectomy, the distal pole of the scaphoid must be fused to the capitate to help stabilize the thumb column. Level of Evidence Level IV

Arthrodesis Versus Carpometacarpal Preservation in Key-Grip Procedures in Tetraplegic Patients: A Comparative Study of 40 Cases

International audiencePURPOSE:Constructing a lateral key pinch (KP) is a universal aim of any functional upper limb surgery program for tetraplegia. Three stages are required: (1) activating the pinch mechanism by flexor pollicis longus tenodesis to the radius or by tendon transfer to the flexor pollicis longus, (2) simplifying the polyarticular chain, and (3) positioning the thumb column. We compared 2 techniques for accomplishing the latter stage, 1 utilizing arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint (CMC) and 1 that did not require arthrodesis of the CMC.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We reviewed 40 cases of KP reconstruction at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years: 17 who had undergone CMC arthrodesis and 23 without CMC arthrodesis. In this group, an abductor pollicis longus tenodesis was necessary to properly position the thumb column in 17 patients.RESULTS:Active KP cases with CMC arthrodesis were significantly stronger than those without an arthrodesis. For passive KP cases, the difference between those cases with CMC arthrodesis and those without was not significant. Regarding opening, for active KP cases with CMC preservation alone, the mean distance between the thumb pulp and the index finger was 4.0 cm at rest and 5.8 cm when passively grasping large objects; for active KP cases without arthrodesis, these values were 3.4 and 6.8 cm, respectively, with the wrist in flexion. For passive KP cases, these values were 2.2 and 3.5 cm with CMC arthrodesis compared with 2.4 and 6.9 cm without arthrodesis. Overall, 23.5% of patients with CMC arthrodesis could not maintain contact between the thumb and the index finger compared with 30.4% without arthrodesis.CONCLUSIONS:Active KP is stronger with than without CMC arthrodesis; however, the KP reconstruction does not open as far when grasping large objects. For passive KP, CMC arthrodesis significantly limits passive opening, with no gain in strength. Neither technique is superior in terms of KP stability.TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic IV

Radial nerve palsy in surgical revision of total elbow arthroplasties: A study of 4 cases and anatomical study, possible aetiologies and prevention

International audienceBACKGROUND:Damage to the radial nerve in the arm during revision of total elbow arthroplasty is a serious complication; which is still not well documented. The aim of this study was to define a way on how to avoid this complication and to prevent it.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Four patients underwent radial palsy after revision of total elbow arthroplasty. An anatomical study on 20 upper limbs was performed to define landmarks for the radial nerve in the arm and elbow.RESULTS:Radial nerve damage occurred near the proximal tip of the stem in all four patients, due to cement seepage caused by cortical effraction in two patients, and to damage caused by the retractors in the two other patients. The anatomical study made it possible to specify landmarks for the radial nerve in relation to the humerus. A high-risk area located 14cm away from the tip of the olecranon fossa, and 15.5cm from the medial epicondyle, was identified.CONCLUSION:A high-risk area for the radial nerve was defined and suggested targeted landmarks with a posterior proximal counter-incision situated at about 14cm above the olecranon fossa

Total elbow arthroplasty: Influence of implant positioning on functional outcomes

International audienceBACKGROUND:Restoring the axis of rotation is often considered crucial to achieving good functional outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty. The objective of this work was to evaluate whether variations in implant positioning correlated with clinical outcomes.HYPOTHESIS:Clinical outcomes are dictated by the quality of implant positioning.MATERIAL AND METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of data from 25 patients (26 elbows). Function was assessed using a pain score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The patients also underwent a clinical evaluation for measurements of motion range and flexion/extension strength. Position of the humeral and ulnar implants was assessed by computed tomography with reconstruction using OsiriX software. Indices reflecting anterior offset, lateral offset, valgus, height, and rotation were computed by subtracting the ulnar value of each of these variables from the corresponding humeral value. These indices provided a quantitative assessment of whether position errors for the two components had additive effects or, on the contrary, counterbalanced each other. Elbows with prosthetic loosening or extensive epiphyseal destruction were excluded.RESULTS:Of the 26 elbows, 5 were excluded. In the remaining 21 elbows, the discrepancy between the humeral and ulnar lateral offsets was significantly associated with pain intensity (P ≤ 0.05) and the MEPS (P ≤ 0.05). Anterior position of the ulna relative to the humerus was associated with decreased extension strength (P ≤ 0.05) and worse results for all functional parameters (P ≤ 0.05).DISCUSSION:In the absence of loosening, positioning errors seem to adversely affect functional outcomes, probably by placing inappropriate stress on the soft tissues