386 research outputs found

    Property (T)(T) and strong Property (T)(T) for unital CC^*-algebras

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we will give a thorough study of the notion of Property (T)(T) for CC^*-algebras (as introduced by M.B. Bekka in \cite{Bek-T}) as well as a slight stronger version of it, called "strong property (T)(T)" (which is also an analogue of the corresponding concept in the case of discrete groups and type II1\rm II_1-factors). More precisely, we will give some interesting equivalent formulations as well as some permanence properties for both property (T)(T) and strong property (T)(T). We will also relate them to certain (T)(T)-type properties of the unitary group of the underlying CC^*-algebra

    Linear orthogonality preservers of Hilbert bundles

    Full text link
    Due to the corresponding fact concerning Hilbert spaces, it is natural to ask if the linearity and the orthogonality structure of a Hilbert CC^*-module determine its CC^*-algebra-valued inner product. We verify this in the case when the CC^*-algebra is commutative (or equivalently, we consider a Hilbert bundle over a locally compact Hausdorff space). More precisely, a C\mathbb{C}-linear map θ\theta (not assumed to be bounded) between two Hilbert CC^*-modules is said to be "orthogonality preserving" if \left =0 whenever \left =0. We prove that if θ\theta is an orthogonality preserving map from a full Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(\Omega)-module EE into another Hilbert C0(Ω)C_0(\Omega)-module FF that satisfies a weaker notion of C0(Ω)C_0(\Omega)-linearity (known as "localness"), then θ\theta is bounded and there exists ϕCb(Ω)+\phi\in C_b(\Omega)_+ such that \left\ =\ \phi\cdot\left, \quad \forall x,y \in E. On the other hand, if FF is a full Hilbert CC^*-module over another commutative CC^*-algebra C0(Δ)C_0(\Delta), we show that a "bi-orthogonality preserving" bijective map θ\theta with some "local-type property" will be bounded and satisfy \left\ =\ \phi\cdot\left\circ\sigma, \quad \forall x,y \in E where ϕCb(Ω)+\phi\in C_b(\Omega)_+ and σ:ΔΩ\sigma: \Delta \rightarrow \Omega is a homeomorphism

    Linear orthogonality preservers of Hilbert CC^*-modules over general CC^*-algebras

    Full text link
    As a partial generalisation of the Uhlhorn theorem to Hilbert CC^*-modules, we show in this article that the module structure and the orthogonality structure of a Hilbert CC^*-module determine its Hilbert CC^*-module structure. In fact, we have a more general result as follows. Let AA be a CC^*-algebra, EE and FF be Hilbert AA-modules, and IEI_E be the ideal of AA generated by {x,yA:x,yE}\{\langle x,y\rangle_A: x,y\in E\}. If Φ:EF\Phi : E\to F is an AA-module map, not assumed to be bounded but satisfying Φ(x),Φ(y)A = 0wheneverx,yA = 0, \langle \Phi(x),\Phi(y)\rangle_A\ =\ 0\quad\text{whenever}\quad\langle x,y\rangle_A\ =\ 0, then there exists a unique central positive multiplier uM(IE)u\in M(I_E) such that Φ(x),Φ(y)A = ux,yA(x,yE). \langle \Phi(x), \Phi(y)\rangle_A\ =\ u \langle x, y\rangle_A\qquad (x,y\in E). As a consequence, Φ\Phi is automatically bounded, the induced map Φ0:EΦ(E)\Phi_0: E\to \overline{\Phi(E)} is adjointable, and Eu1/2\overline{Eu^{1/2}} is isomorphic to Φ(E)\overline{\Phi(E)} as Hilbert AA-modules. If, in addition, Φ\Phi is bijective, then EE is isomorphic to FF.Comment: 15 page

    Ready for 21st-century Education – Pre-service Music Teachers Embracing ICT to Foster Student-centered Learning

    Get PDF
    AbstractThere is always competition for curriculum time for pre-service teachers, especially in teaching methods courses. This study explored whether pre-service teachers are prepared to learn from each other online. It looked at 47 students taking a course entitled “Music Education Methods and Strategies”. Each was required to design a game as a form of pedagogy in music education and to upload it to a learning management system (LMS). They then had to read and comment on all submissions and vote for the best three games. After doing so, the students completed an online survey about their experiences. Thirty-nine valid questionnaires were submitted, giving a response rate of 83%. It is very encouraging to note that the students gave all questions a high rating (scoring them 3 or above on a 5-point Likert-type scale). The two top-rated items confirmed that the students felt responsible for their own learning and competent in using a LMS. This suggests that pre-service music teachers are ready for 21st-century education using information and communications technology to develop learner-centered activities
    corecore