2,793 research outputs found
Tafsir Misoginisme Dan Inkonsistensi Birokrat (Implikasi Putusan MK No. 4/PUU-VIII/2010)
The verdict of Constitutional Court (MK) Number 4/PUU-VIII/2010 can be described as a verdict blocking chances for the civil servant (Pegawai Negeri Sipil) to represent himself/herself as the head of executive in the district such as governor, mayor, regent, and any others in the mayor general election (Pemilukada) because one of the prerequisites to be a civil servant must be followed by a resignation letter. This prerequisite cannot be considered as a form of discrimination and injustice for the civil servant, yet as a kind of protection through the strategic role of the civil servant. If the civil servant still keeps going on its track, as a bureaucracy devotee, then people\u27s civil rights must have been fulfilled
Pembatalan UU BHP Dan Pendidikan Berbasis Humanistik
Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) has postponed the Constitution (UU) Number 9 Year 2009 dealing with Educational Law Institutions (BHP) since it is evaluated violating UUD 1945. MK evaluates that this UU BHP is against the UUD 1945 so that any expectations from the people expect it should be brought on. UU BHP inspite of uniforming the form of educational law institutions so that it ignores the form of any other law intituions such as private organization, waqaf, and so forth, also gives the justification to the commercialism practices and education capitalism, which dangerously cause the threatened human rights of poor people in gaining proper education or humanity
Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/atau Wakil Presiden
It has been highlighted in the constitution that the Constitutional Court has one obligation to give verdict on the House of Representatives' (DPR) opinion regarding the impeachment of the president and/or the vice president. Obligation given by this constitution is about to prove that Indonesia is a law state. Even though the Constitutional Court has become part of the dismissal process of president and vice president, the independence of its obligation is doubted by public because of the recruitment factors of the Constitutional Court judges. Even though these judges successfully give verdict because the president or the vice president is proven to break the law, it does not mean that its verdict absolutey ties the authority of the House of Assembly (MPR)
- …