925 research outputs found

    Metallic Xenon, Molecular Condensates, and Superconductivity

    Full text link
    A possibility of explaining the light absorption observed to occur under pressure-induced xenon metallization as due to the transition to the superconducting state is analyzed. The mechanism of the van der Waals bonding is discussed.Comment: LaTeX 2.09 (RevTeX), 4 pages, 4 PostScript figures included in tex

    Search for Exclusive Charmless Hadronic B Decays

    Get PDF
    We have searched for two-body charmless hadronic decays of BB mesons. Final states include ππ\pi\pi, KπK \pi, and KKKK with both charged and neutral kaons and pions; πρ\pi\rho, KρK \rho, and KπK^*\pi; and KϕK\phi, Kϕ K^*\phi, and ϕϕ\phi\phi. The data used in this analysis consist of 2.6~million BBˉB\bar{B}~pairs produced at the Υ(4S)\Upsilon(4S) taken with the CLEO-II detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR). We measure the branching fraction of the sum of B0π+πB^0 \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^- and B0K+πB^0 \rightarrow K^+\pi^- to be (1.80.50.3+0.6+0.2±0.2)×105(1.8^{+0.6+0.2}_{-0.5-0.3}\pm0.2) \times 10^{-5}. In addition, we place upper limits on individual branching fractions in the range from 10410^{-4} to 10610^{-6}.Comment: 33 page LATEX file, uses REVTEX and psfig, 14 figures in a separate uuencoded postscript file, postscript version also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Mid Campanian-Lower Maastrichtian magnetostratigraphy of the James Ross Basin, Antarctica: Chronostratigraphical implications

    Get PDF
    The James Ross Basin, in the northern Antarctic Peninsula, exposes which is probably the world thickest and most complete Late Cretaceous sedimentary succession of southern high latitudes. Despite its very good exposures and varied and abundant fossil fauna, precise chronological determination of its infill is still lacking. We report results from a magnetostratigraphic study on shelfal sedimentary rocks of the Marambio Group, southeastern James Ross Basin, Antarctica. The succession studied covers a ~1,200 m-thick stratigraphic interval within the Hamilton Point, Sanctuary Cliffs and Karlsen Cliffs Members of the Snow Hill Island Formation, the Haslum Crag Formation, and the lower López de Bertodano Formation. The basic chronological reference framework is given by ammonite assemblages, which indicate a Late Campanian – Early Maastrichtian age for the studied units. Magnetostratigraphic samples were obtained from five partial sections located on James Ross and Snow Hill islands, the results from which agree partially with this previous biostratigraphical framework. Seven geomagnetic polarity reversals are identified in this work, allowing to identify the Chron C32/C33 boundary in Ammonite Assemblage 8-1, confirming the Late Campanian age of the Hamilton Point Member. However, the identification of the Chron C32/C31 boundary in Ammonite Assemblage 8-2 assigns the base of the Sanctuary Cliffs Member to the early Maastrichtian, which differs from the Late Campanian age previously assigned by ammonite biostratigraphy. This magnetostratigraphy spans ~14 Ma of sedimentary succession and together with previous partial magnetostratigraphies on Early-Mid Campanian and Middle Maastrichtian to Danian columns permits a complete and continuous record of the Late Cretaceous distal deposits of the James Ross Basin. This provides the required chronological resolution to solve the intra-basin and global correlation problems of the Late Cretaceous in the Southern Hemisphere in general and in the Weddellian province in particular, given by endemism and diachronic extinctions on invertebrate fossils, including ammonites. The new chronostratigraphic scheme allowed us to calculate sediment accumulation rates for almost the entire Late Cretaceous infill of the distal James Ross Basin (the Marambio Group), showing a monotonous accumulation for more than 8 Myr during the upper Campanian and a dramatic increase during the early Maastrichtian, controlled by tectonic and/or eustatic causes.Fil: Milanese, Florencia Nidia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Olivero, Eduardo Bernardo. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Raffi, María Eugenia. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Franceschinis, Pablo Reinaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Gallo, Leandro César. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Skinner, Steven M.. California State University; Estados UnidosFil: Mitchell, Ross N.. California Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Kirschvink, Joseph L.. California Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos. Tokyo Institute of Technology; JapónFil: Rapalini, Augusto Ernesto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geociencias Básicas, Aplicadas y Ambientales de Buenos Aires; Argentin

    Observation of Exclusive Two-Body B Decays to Kaons and Pions

    Get PDF
    We have studied two-body charmless hadronic decays of B mesons into the final states ππ\pi\pi, KπK \pi, and KKKK. Using 3.3 million BBˉB\bar{B} pairs collected with the CLEO-II detector, we have made the first observation of the decays B0K+πB^0\to K^+\pi^-, B+K0π+B^+\to K^0\pi^+, and the sum of B+π+π0B^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0 and B+K+π0B^+ \to K^+\pi^0 decays (an average over charge-conjugate states is always implied). We place upper limits on branching fractions for the remaining decay modes.Comment: 9 page postscript file, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Flavor-Specific Inclusive B Decays to Charm

    Get PDF
    We have measured the branching fractions for B -> D_bar X, B -> D X, and B -> D_bar X \ell^+ \nu, where ``B'' is an average over B^0 and B^+, ``D'' is a sum over D^0 and D^+, and``D_bar'' is a sum over D^0_bar and D^-. From these results and some previously measured branching fractions, we obtain Br(b -> c c_bar s) = (21.9 ±\pm 3.7)%, Br(b -> s g) K^- \pi^+) = (3.69 ±\pm 0.20)%. Implications for the ``B semileptonic decay problem'' (measured branching fraction being below theoretical expectations) are discussed. The increase in the value of Br(b -> c c_bar s) due to B>DXB -> D X eliminates 40% of the discrepancy.Comment: 12 page postscript file, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Measurement of the BˉDνˉ\bar{B}\to D\ell\bar{\nu} Partila Width and Form Factor Parameters

    Full text link
    We have studied the decay BˉDνˉ\bar{B} \to D\ell\bar{\nu}, where =eorμ\ell=e or \mu. From a fit to the differential decay rate dΓ/dwd\Gamma/dw we measure the rate normalization FD(1)Vcb{\cal F}_D(1)|V_{cb}| and form factor slope ρ^D2\hat{\rho}^2_D, and, using measured values of τB\tau_B, find Γ(BˉDνˉ)=(12.0±0.9±2.1)ns1\Gamma(\bar{B} \to D\ell\bar{\nu}) = (12.0 \pm 0.9 \pm 2.1) ns^{-1}. The resulting branching fractions are B(Bˉ0D+νˉ)=(1.87±0.15±0.32){\cal B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^+\ell^-\bar{\nu})=(1.87 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.32)% and B(BD0νˉ)=(1.94±0.15±0.34){\cal B}(B^- \to D^0\ell^-\bar{\nu})=(1.94 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.34)%. The form factor parameters are in agreement with those measured in BˉDνˉ\bar{B} \to D^*\ell\bar{\nu} decays, as predicted by heavy quark effective theory.Comment: 11 pages, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Study of 3-prong Hadronic τ\tau Decays with Charged Kaons

    Full text link
    Using a sample of 4.7/fb integrated luminosity accumulated with the CLEO-II detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR), we have measured the branching fractions of the tau lepton into Kh+πντK^- h^+ \pi^- \nu_\tau and KK+πντK^- K^+ \pi^- \nu_\tau relative to hh+hντ;Kh+ππ0ντh^- h^+ h^- \nu_\tau; K^- h^+ \pi^- \pi^0\nu_\tau and KK+ππ0ντK^- K^+ \pi^- \pi^0\nu_\tau relative to hh+hπ0ντh^- h^+ h^- \pi^0 \nu_\tau. The relative branching fractions are: (5.16+-0.20+-0.50)*10210^{-2}, (1.52+-0.14+-0.29)*10210^{-2}, (2.54+-0.44+-0.39)*10210^{-2} and <0.0154<0.0154 at 95% C.L., respectively. Coupled with additional experimental information, we use our results to extract information on the structure of three-prong tau decays to charged kaons.Comment: 16 pages postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Measurements of the Ratios B(Ds+η+ν)/B(Ds+ϕ+ν){\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta\ell^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \phi\ell^+\nu) and B(Ds+η+ν)/B(Ds+ϕ+ν){\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta'\ell^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \phi\ell^+\nu)

    Full text link
    Using the CLEO~II detector we measure B(Ds+ηe+ν)/B(Ds+ϕe+ν)=1.24±0.12±0.15{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta e^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \phi e^+\nu) =1.24\pm0.12\pm0.15, B(Ds+ηe+ν)/B(Ds+ϕe+ν)=0.43±0.11±0.07{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta' e^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \phi e^+\nu) =0.43\pm0.11\pm0.07 and B(Ds+ηe+ν)/B(Ds+ηe+ν)=0.35±0.09±0.07{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta' e^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \eta e^+\nu) =0.35\pm0.09\pm0.07. We find the vector to pseudoscalar ratio, B(Ds+ϕe+ν)/B(Ds+(η+η)e+ν)=0.60±0.06±0.06{\cal B}(D_s^+\to \phi e^+\nu)/{\cal B}(D_s^+\to (\eta+\eta') e^+\nu) =0.60\pm0.06\pm0.06, which is similar to the ratio found in non strange DD decays.Comment: 11 page uuencoded postscript file, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Measurement of Br(D0Kπ+)Br(D^{0}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}) using Partila Reconstruction of BˉD+Xνˉ\bar{B}\to D^{*+}X\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}

    Full text link
    We present a measurement of the absolute branching fraction for D0>Kpi+D^0 -> K^- pi^+ using the reconstruction of the decay chain Bbar>D+XlnubarBbar -> D^{*+} X l^- nubar , D+>D0pi+D^{*+} -> D^0 pi^+ where only the lepton and the low-momentum pion from the D+D^{*+} are detected. With data collected by the CLEO II detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have determined Br(D0>Kpi+)=[3.81+0.15(stat.)+0.16(syst.)]Br(D^0 -> K^- pi^+)= [3.81 +- 0.15(stat.) +- 0.16(syst.)]%.Comment: 10 page postscript file, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN
    corecore