A method to design job rotation schedules to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders in repetitive work

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in International Journal of Production Research in 2012, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2011.653452.Job rotation is an organisational strategy widely used in human-based production lines with the aim of preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). These work environments are characterised by the presence of a high repetition of movements, which is a major risk factor associated with WMSDs. This article presents a genetic algorithm to obtain rotation schedules aimed at preventing WMSDs in such environments. To do this, it combines the effectiveness of genetic algorithms optimisation with the ability to evaluate the presence of risk by repeated movements by following the OCRA ergonomic assessment method. The proposed algorithm can design solutions in which workers will switch jobs with high repeatability of movements with other less demanding jobs that support their recovery. In addition, these solutions are able to diversify the tasks performed by workers during the day, consider their disabilities and comply with restrictions arising from the work organisation.The authors wish to thank the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia which supported this research through its Program for the Support of Research and Development 2009 and its financing through the project PAID-06-09/2902.Asensio Cuesta, S.; Diego-Mas, JA.; Cremades Oliver, L.; González-Cruz, M. (2012). A method to design job rotation schedules to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders in repetitive work. International Journal of Production Research. 50(24):7467-7478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.653452S74677478502

A genetic algorithm for the design of job rotation schedules considering ergonomic and competence criteria

Job rotation is an organizational strategy increasingly used in manufacturing systems as it provides benefits to both workers and management in an organization. Job rotation prevents musculoskeletal disorders, eliminates boredom and increases job satisfaction and morale. As a result, the company gains a skilled and motivated workforce, which leads to increases in productivity, employee loyalty and decreases in employee turnover. A multi-criteria genetic algorithm is employed to generate job rotation schedules, with considering the most adequate employee-job assignments to prevent musculoskeletal disorders caused by accumulation of fatigue. The algorithm provides the best adequacy available between workers and the competences needed for performing the tasks. The design of the rotation schedules is based not only on ergonomic criteria but also on issues related to product quality and employee satisfaction. The model includes the workers' competences as a measure for the goodness of solutions. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.We thank the Universidad Politecnica de Valencia for its support of this research through its Research and Development Program 2009 and financing through the project PAID-06-09/2902. The Universidad Politecnica de Valencia has funded the translation of this work.Asensio Cuesta, S.; Diego Más, JA.; Canós Darós, L.; Andrés Romano, C. (2012). A genetic algorithm for the design of job rotation schedules considering ergonomic and competence criteria. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 60(9-12):1161-1174. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3672-0S11611174609-12Podniece Z (2008) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: prevention report. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, BelgiumBernard B, Sauter S, Fine LJ, Petersen I, Hales T (1994) Job task and psychosocial risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among new paper employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 20:417–426Emodi T, Zhang WJ, Lang SYT, Bi ZM (2007) A framework for modeling and analysis of human repetitive operations in a production assembly line. International SAE Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Conference And Exhibition, University District Seattle, Washington, USAHuang HJ (1999) Job rotation from the employees’ point of view. Res Hum R M 7:75–85Eriksson T, Ortega J (2006) The adoption of job rotation: testing the theories. Ind Labor Relat Rev 59:653–666Azizi N, Zolfaghari S, Liang M (2010) Modeling job rotation in manufacturing systems: the study of employee’s boredom and skill variations. Int J Prod Econ 123:69–85Cunningham BJ, Eberle T (1990) A guide to job enrichment and redesign. Personnel 67:56–61Rissen D, Melin B, Sandsjö L, Dohns I, Lundberg U (2002) Psychophysiological stress reactions, trapezius muscle activity, and neck and shoulder pain among female cashiers before and after introduction of job rotation. Work Stress 16:127–137Jonsson B (1988) Electromyographic studies of job rotation. Scand J Work Environ Health 14:108–109Hazzard L, Mautz J, Wrightsman D (1992) Job rotation cuts cumulative trauma cases. Personnel 71:29–32Papadimitriou CH, Steiglitz K (1982) Combinatorial optimization: algorithms and complexity. Dover, New YorkCarnahan BJ, Redfern MS, Norman B (2000) Designing safe job rotation schedules using optimization and heuristic search. Ergonomics 43:543–560Tharmmaphornphilas W, Norman B (2004) A quantitative method for determining proper job rotation intervals. Ann Oper Res 128:251–266Yaoyuenyong S, Nanthavanij S (2006) Hybrid procedure to determine optimal workforce without noise hazard exposure. Comput Ind Eng 51:743–764Costa AM, Miralles C (2009) Job rotation in assembly lines employing disabled workers. Int J Prod Econ 120:625–632Aryanezhad MB, Kheirkhah V, Deljoo V, Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ (2009) Designing safe job rotation schedules based upon workers skills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:193–199Tharmmaphornphilas W, Norman BA (2007) A methodology to create robust job rotation schedules. Ann Oper Res 155:339–360Nanthavanij S, Kullpattaranirun T (2001) A genetic algorithm approach to determine minimax work assignments. Int J Ind Eng Theor 8:176–185Kullpattaranirun T, Nanthavanij S (2005) A heuristic genetic algorithm for solving complex safety-based work assignment problems. Int J Ind Eng Theor 12:45–57Diego-Mas JA, Asensio-Cuesta S, Sanchez-Romero MA, Artacho-Ramirez MA (2009) A multi-criteria genetic algorithm for the generation of job rotation schedules. Int J Ind Ergon 39:23–33Seçkiner SU, Kurt M (2007) A simulated annealing approach to the solution of job rotation scheduling problems. Appl Math Comput 188:31–45Seçkiner SU, Kurt M (2008) Ant colony optimization for the job rotation scheduling problem. Appl Math Comput 201:149–160Spencer L, Spencer S (1993) Competence at work: models for superior performance. Wiley, New YorkAshkanasy NM, Hartel CEJ, Daus CS (2002) Diversity and emotion: the new frontiers in organizational behavior and research. J Manag 28:307–338Triggs DD, King PM (2000) Job rotation: an administrative strategy for hazard control. Prof Saf 45:32–34Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MichiganEmodi T, Zhang WJ (2008) Injury analysis in assembly and production lines: a state of the art review. Int J Ergon Hum Factors 30:11–38Glover F (1986) Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput Oper Res 13:533–549Chambers LD (1995) Practical handbook of genetic algorithms: new frontiers, 1st edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaChambers LD (1998) Practical handbook of genetic algorithms: complex coding system, 1st edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaChambers LD (2000) Practical handbook of genetic algorithms: applications, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaDavis L (1991) Handbook of genetic algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, MassachusettsRodgers SH (1986) Ergonomic design for people at work. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkRodgers SH (1992) A functional job analysis technique. Occup Med State Art 7:679–711Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 7:749–776McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24:91–9