Differences in DOM of rewetted and natural peatlands - Results from high-field FT-ICR-MS and bulk optical parameters.

Peatlands can be a potential source of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in fresh water catchment areas. The quantity and quality of DOM can differ between pristine, degraded and rewetted peatlands. Due to the large scale and continuing losses of peatlands, their conservation and restoration has been increasingly emphasized. Mostly rewetting measures are required to improve the hydrology of damaged peatlands, which is a precondition for the resettlement of peat-forming plant species. Thus, in term of DOM, there is a special need to understand how rewetting measures affect DOM characteristics and concentrations.To estimate the potential leaching of humic substances from rewetted areas two natural sites were compared with four artificially rewetted sites in a peatland area of the Harz Mountains National Park, Germany. This was done with regards to DOM quality by combining the results from Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS, measured at one time in Spring) and excitation-emission-matrix fluorescence spectroscopy (EEMF, measured monthly for the period of one year).The DOM quality was significantly less variable in the pristine peatland soil water compared to the rewetted peatland soil waters, from both a spatial and a seasonal perspective. The soil water from the rewetted peatland sites showed a higher degree of humification compared to pristine peatland. DOC concentration was mostly consistent in the pristine peatland over the year. The rewetted peatlands showed higher DOC levels in Summer months and lower DOC in Winter months compared to the pristine peatland.It can be concluded that the rewetting of peatlands is coupled with high concentrations of DOC in soil water and its quality is highly aromatic (as reflected by the observed values from the humification index) during times with elevated temperature. The results may have a significant input for dynamic catchment area studies with regards to rewetting peatland sites

Synthesis, structure, and stability of adducts between phosphide and amide anions and the Lewis acids borane, tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane, and tris(pentafluorophenyl)alane

The phosphinoborane adduct H(3)P center dot B(C(6)F(5))(3) can be deprotonated using LiN(SiMe(3))(2) to give the phosphidoborate salt Li[H(2)PB(C(6)F(5))(3)], which was converted to the phosphidodiborates Li[H(2)P{B(C(6)F(5))(3)}(2)] and Li[H(2)P{B(C(6)F(5))(3)}{BH(3)}] by treatment with an equivalent of B(C(6)F(5))(3) or Me(2)S center dot BH(3), respectively. A series of anions of the form [RR'P{M(C(6)F(5))(3)}{BH(3)}](-), where R = R' = Ph or R= (t)Bu, R' = H, and M = B or Al, were prepared (through treatment of salts Li[RR'P(BH(3))] with the corresponding Lewis acid) and characterized using multinuclear NMR elemental analysis and X-ray crystallography. The solid state structures of [Li(Et(2)O)(x)][Ph(2)P{M(C(6)F(5))(3)}{BH(3)}] exhibit eta(2)-bonding of the BH(3) group to the cationic lithium center. The attempted preparation of an analogous series with amide cores of the form [R(2)N{B(C(6)F(5))(3)}{BH(3)}](-) proved unsuccessful; among the competing reaction pathways hydride abstraction occurred preferentially to yield Li[HB(C(6)F(5))(3)] and dimers or higher oligorners with the composition (R(2)NBH(2))(n