6 research outputs found

    Evidence that platelets from transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia patients induce T cell activation

    No full text
    A hypercoagulable state leading to increased risk for thrombotic events represents one of the most common complications observed in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) patients. TDT patients have increased frequencies of circulating activated platelets. However, there is no information so far if platelets from TDT patients can activate T cells. In the present study we showed that T cells treated with platelets from TDT patients showed significant increased surface expression of CD69 compared to the T cells treated with platelets from healthy individuals. Patients with splenectomy showed increased T cell activation compared to patients with intact spleen. No T cell activation was observed following incubation with plasma alone, nor with platelets from healthy subjects. The percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs) were also examined. TDT patients showed statistically significant increased percentages of Tregs compared to healthy controls. Additionally, we observed a positive statistically significant correlation between the percentages of Tregs and the platelet-induced activated T cells in patients who were not treated with aspirin. TDT patients showed increased levels of sP-selectin, suPAR and GDF-15, molecules implicated in platelet activation. We show that platelets from TDT patients can activate T cells in vitro. This activation correlates with markers of platelet activation and increased numbers of Tregs, perhaps in an effort to eliminate immune dysregulation, conceivably secondary to platelet activation. © 202

    Comparison of vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VBMCP) and interferon-α\alpha with melphalan and prednisone (MP) and interferon-α\alpha (IFN-α\alpha) in patients with good-prognosis multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized study

    No full text
    Objectives. The purpose of the study was to evaluate, in a selected group of myeloma patients with favorable prognosis, the effect, on response and survival, of polychymotherapy compared with melphalan prednisone. plus interferon in both arms. Methods: Eighty-nine previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma and prognostic factors indicating a good prognosis were randomized to either oral melphalan plus prednisone (MP) in combination with recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha) or combination chemotherapy with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) alternating with rIFN-alpha. The two treatment groups were comparable in terms of pretreatment characteristics. Results. The overall response rate was 67.4% (2.3% complete remission, 65.1% partial response) in the MP/IFN-alpha group and 69.1% (14.3% complete remission, 54.8% partial response) in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.59). There were no differences also in response duration and overall survival between the two treatment groups. The median response duration was 39.1 months in the MP/IFN-alpha group and was not reached in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.6). Overall survival was long ill both treatment groups. The estimated 5-yr survival was 66% and 62% in the MP/IFN-alpha and VBMCP/IFN-alpha group, respectively (p = 0.8). Toxicity was modest and treatments were well tolerated. Neutropenia (WHO grade 3 or 4) was higher, but not statistically significant, in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group. Conclusions: The results of the study show that in myeloma patients with good prognosis, combination chemotherapy alternating with interferon-a has no advantage over conventional MP plus interferon-alpha, in regard to response rate, response duration, and overall survival of patients

    Comparison of vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VBMCP) and interferon-alpha with melphalan and prednisone (MP) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with good-prognosis multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized study

    No full text
    Objectives. The purpose of the study was to evaluate, in a selected group of myeloma patients with favorable prognosis, the effect, on response and survival, of polychymotherapy compared with melphalan prednisone. plus interferon in both arms. Methods: Eighty-nine previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma and prognostic factors indicating a good prognosis were randomized to either oral melphalan plus prednisone (MP) in combination with recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha) or combination chemotherapy with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) alternating with rIFN-alpha. The two treatment groups were comparable in terms of pretreatment characteristics. Results. The overall response rate was 67.4% (2.3% complete remission, 65.1% partial response) in the MP/IFN-alpha group and 69.1% (14.3% complete remission, 54.8% partial response) in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.59). There were no differences also in response duration and overall survival between the two treatment groups. The median response duration was 39.1 months in the MP/IFN-alpha group and was not reached in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.6). Overall survival was long ill both treatment groups. The estimated 5-yr survival was 66% and 62% in the MP/IFN-alpha and VBMCP/IFN-alpha group, respectively (p = 0.8). Toxicity was modest and treatments were well tolerated. Neutropenia (WHO grade 3 or 4) was higher, but not statistically significant, in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group. Conclusions: The results of the study show that in myeloma patients with good prognosis, combination chemotherapy alternating with interferon-a has no advantage over conventional MP plus interferon-alpha, in regard to response rate, response duration, and overall survival of patients

    Prospective randomized comparison of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as intravenous bolus injection and VAD with liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma

    No full text
    Background: The combination of vincristine and doxorubicin administered as a continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter together with intermittent high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) is an effective primary treatment for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. In order to avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, which imposes logistic problems for outpatient administration, several phase II studies have explored the feasibility and efficacy of VAD-like outpatient regimens. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare the objective response rates of two VAD-like outpatient regimens as primary treatment for symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma. Patients and methods: Patients were entered in a randomized study regardless of age, performance status and renal function. One hundred and twenty-seven patients received VAD bolus, which consisted of vincristine 0.4 mg i.v., doxorubicin 9 mg/m(2) i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for four consecutive days and 132 patients received VAD doxil, which consisted of vincristine 2 mg i.v. and liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for 4 days. The two regimens were administered every 28 days for four courses and in courses 1 and 3, in both arms, dexamethasone was also given on days 9-12 and 17-20. Results: An objective response was documented in 61.4% and 61.3% of patients treated with VAD bolus and VAD doxil, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild or moderate and equally distributed between the two treatment arms with the exception of alopecia, which was more common after VAD bolus, and of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, which was more common after VAD doxil. Conclusions: Our multicenter trial, which included an unselected patient population, indicated that both VAD bolus and VAD doxil can be administered to outpatients and can provide an equal opportunity of rapid response in many patients with multiple myeloma
    corecore