Effects of iron chelation therapy on the clinical course of aceruloplasminemia: an analysis of aggregated case reports

Background: Aceruloplasminemia is a rare genetic iron overload disorder, characterized by progressive neurological manifestations. The effects of iron chelation on neurological outcomes have only been described in case studies, and are inconsistent. Aggregated case reports were analyzed to help delineate the disease-modifying potential of treatment. Methods: Data on clinical manifestations, treatment and neurological outcomes of treatment were collected from three neurologically symptomatic Dutch patients, who received deferiprone with phlebotomy as a new therapeutic approach, and combined with other published cases. Neurological outcomes of treatment were compared between patients starting treatment when neurologically symptomatic and patients without neurological manifestations. Results: Therapeutic approaches for aceruloplasminemia have been described in 48 patients worldwide, including our three patients. Initiation of treatment in a presymptomatic stage of the disease delayed the estimated onset of neurological manifestations by 10 years (median age 61 years, SE 5.0 vs. median age 51 years, SE 0.6, p = 0.001). Although in 11/20 neurologically symptomatic patients neurological manifestations remained stable or improved during treatment, these patients were treated significantly shorter than patients who deteriorated neurologically (median 6 months vs. medi

New insights in the neurological phenotype of aceruloplasminemia in Caucasian patients.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis aceruloplasminemia is usually made in patients with advanced neurological manifestations of the disease. In these patients prognosis is poor, disabilities are severe and patients often die young. The aim of our study was to facilitate recognition of aceruloplasminemia at a disease stage at which treatment can positively influence outcome. Currently, the neurological phenotype of aceruloplasminemia has been mainly described in Japanese patients. This 'classical' phenotype consists of cerebellar ataxia, hyperkinetic movement disorders and cognitive decline. In this study we describe the spectrum of neurological disease in Caucasian patients. METHODS: Data on neurological presentation and follow-up were gathered from both our patients, homozygous for the G631R mutation in the CP gene, and other published Caucasian cases. Neurological features of aceruloplasminemia in Caucasian patients were compared to those summarized in Japanese patients. RESULTS: 21 Caucasian patients, both ours and the described cases, displayed a wide range of movement disorders with predominant chorea, parkinsonism and ataxia, and also tremor and dystonia. In addition to cognitive decline, nearly half of the Caucasian patients presented with psychiatric changes, including depression, anxiety and behavioral changes. In one-third of the neurologically symptomatic Caucasian patients, cognitive- or psychiatric changes were the first neurological manifestations of aceruloplasminemia. CONCLUSIONS: Aceruloplasminemia in Caucasian patients can present with a wider range and a different order of neurological symptoms than previously described in Japanese patients. Psychiatric changes and parkinsonism can be added to the spectrum of neurological disease. Cognitive- or psychiatric changes may be the first neurological manifestations of aceruloplasminemia

Movement Disorders and Liver Disease

The association of movement disorders with structural or functional hepatic disease occurs in three principal scenarios: (1) combined involvement of both organ systems from a single disease entity, (2) nervous system dysfunction resulting from exposure to toxic compounds in the setting of defective hepatic clearance, or (3) hepatic and/or neurological injury secondary to exposure to exogenous drugs or toxins. An important early step in the workup of any patient with combined movement disorders and liver disease is the exclusion of Wilson's disease. Diagnostic delay remains common for this treatable disorder, and this has major implications for patient outcomes. Thereafter, a structured approach integrating variables such as age of onset, tempo of progression, nature and severity of liver involvement, movement disorder phenomenology, exposure to drugs/toxins and laboratory/neuroimaging findings is key to ensuring timely diagnosis and disease‐specific therapy. Herein, we provide an overview of disorders which may manifest with a combination of movement disorders and liver disease, structured under the three headings as detailed above. In each section, the most common disorders are discussed, along with important clinical pearls, suggested diagnostic workup, differential diagnoses and where appropriate, treatment considerations