7 research outputs found
Comment on “Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study” by Sprung et al.
End-of-life decision making in neonates and infants: comparison of the Netherlands and Belgium (Flanders)
Aim: We compared the results of two recent studies on end-of-life decisions (ELDs) for neonates and infants in Belgium (Flanders) and the Netherlands.
Methods: Questionnaires were sent to physicians who reported the death of a child under the age of 1 (Belgium: n = 292, response 87%; Netherlands: n = 249, response 84%). The questionnaires included structured questions about whether death had been preceded by ELDs, and about the decision-making process.
Results: In both countries, in about 25% of all deaths a life-sustaining treatment was withheld, and in about 40% pain or other symptoms were alleviated taking into account that death might be hastened. In Belgium, a life-sustaining treatment was less often withdrawn than in the Netherlands (32% vs. 50%, respectively). Drugs were administered with the explicit intention of hastening death in similar percentages of all deaths (Belgium: 7%; Netherlands: 9%). Dutch physicians more often than Belgian physicians discussed ELDs with parents (96% vs. 81%, respectively), and with colleague physicians (94% vs. 80%, respectively).
Conclusions: End-of-life decision making in severely ill neonates seems to be rather similar in Belgium and the Netherlands. Differences are that Dutch physicians more often withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Furthermore, parents and colleague physicians are more often involved in the decision making in the Netherlands
Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands, 1995-2001
End-of-life decision-making for severely affected infants might be influenced by technical advances and societal debates. In 2001, we assessed the proportion of deaths of infants younger than 1 year that were preceded by end-of-life decisions, by replicating a questionnaire study from 1995. This proportion increased from 62% to 68% (weighted percentages), but the difference was not significant. Most of these decisions were to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Decisions to actively end the lives of infants not dependent on life-sustaining treatment remained stable at 1%. The practice of end-of-life decision-making in neonatology of 2001 has changed little since 199
Dutch experience of monitoring euthanasia
Doctors in the United Kingdom can accompany their patients every step of the way, up until the last. The law stops them helping their patients take the final step, even if that is the patient's fervent wish. Next month's debate in the House of Lords could begin the process of changing the law. To help doctors decide where they stand we publish a range of opinion