27 research outputs found

    Π‘Ρ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ особСнностСй ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ сСрдСчно-сосудистых Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΡˆΠΈΡ… ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π°, Π² Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… условиях Π·Π° 2001-2006 Π³Π³. (фармакоэпидСмиологичСскоС исслСдованиС)

    Get PDF
    The two-stage retrospective review of 1375 medical records of ambulatory patients with myocardial infarction was carried out in order to assess the delivery rate of up-to-date international and domestic guidelines for secondary CVD prevention over a period of 2001- 2006. The gap between the current guidelines for medicamental prophylaxis and their implementation in clinical outpatient practice was revealed. In spite of the fact that doctors began to prescribe preventive drugs more often target levels for cholesterol and blood pressure were not achieved in the major part of patients with myocardial infarction. The prescription rate of antiaggregants, anticoagulants and statins is still rather low.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ двухэтапный рСтроспСктивный Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ 1375 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² кардиологичСского диспансСра, ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΡˆΠΈΡ… ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π°, Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ выполнСния ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ отСчСствСнных Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π‘Π‘Π— Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ 2001-2006 Π³Π³. На этапС Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСчСния выявлСно нСсоотвСтствиС ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ стандартами ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π² клиничСской ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅. НСсмотря Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ основныС Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² стали Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ достовСрно Ρ‡Π°Ρ‰Π΅, большС Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌ Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ достигнуты Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ профиля ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ давлСния. Π’ нСдостаточной ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π² Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… условиях Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ°Π³Ρ€Π΅Π³Π°Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹, антикоагулянты ΠΈ статины

    Five-Year dynamics of secondary prevention in patients with stable angina at specialized out-patient level in Moscow (Pharmacoepidemiology Study)

    No full text
    Aim. To assess five-year trend in terms of specialists' adherence to guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with stable angina on the level of out-patient specialized healthcare institution in Moscow. Material and methods. Two-stage retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study was conducted. The object of the study - patient medical records. At the first stage of the study medical records of 2915 patients with stable angina visited the healthcare institution for the first time in 2006 were included; at the second stage - medical records of 1633 patients with stable angina with primary visit in 2011. Results. Over the five-year period prescription rates of drugs improving prognosis in patients with stable angina significantly increased: antiplatelets - up to 82.7%, beta-blockers - up to 74.3%, statins - up to 45.6%. Despite of no changes registered in prescription rate of the ACE inhibitors, marked increase up to 14.7% in prescription rate of angiotensin receptor blockers was revealed. In the prescription structure of pharmacological groups changes were detected concerning the preferred choice of a specific drug. Due to implementation of dual antiplatelet therapy into clinical practice a reduced number of recommendations of acetylsalicylic acid as monotherapy (down to 93.0%) and increased - in combination with clopidogrel (up to 5.4%) was registered at the second stage of the study. Over a five-year period bisoprolol (55.0%) occupied the leading position in the group of beta-blockers. Metoprolol's prescription rate decreased to 27.4%. Prescription rate of atenolol decreased down to 3.1%, while that of nebivolol increased up to 8.3%. When choosing among statins specialists recommended significantly more often atorvastatin (up to 52.9%). In the group of ACE inhibitors three drugs preserved their leading positions. Meanwhile the number of recommendations of enalapril increased up to 50.8%, perindopril - up to 24.1%. Analysis of prescribed doses revealed significant increase in recommendations of specific drugs in higher daily doses: acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg - up to 71.1%, simvastatin and atorvastatin 20 mg - up to 60.5% and 41.9%, respectively. When prescribing beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors specialists continued to use minimal and medium therapeutic doses, possibly due to dose titration in patients with comorbidities. Conclusion. Study results demonstrated positive trend in terms of specialists' adherence to guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with stable angina. However, a number of problem aspects were identified that require further optimization of medical and preventive measures in healthcare institutions. Β© 2018, Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya

    Secondary prevention in patients after myocardial infarction at ambulatory specialized cardiology institution (pharmacoepidemiology study)

    No full text
    Aim. To assess 5 years trend in level of doctor's adherence to actual guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with a history of myocardial infarction in ambulatory specialized healthcare institution in Moscow. Material and methods. There were 752 patients firstly visited healthcare institution in 2006 and 825 patients - in 2011. Their data was included in two-stage retrospective pharmacoepidemiology study. Results. Prescription rate significantly increased for three of four prophylactic groups recommended for patients with a history of myocardial infarction (antiplatelets - 91.76%, beta-blockers - 83.39%, statins - 69.45%). When assessing prescribed doses of drugs, an increase in a number of their higher doses prescriptions was revealed (at the second stage of the study acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day received 75.32% of patients, enalapril 20 mg/day - 30.45%, simvastatin and atorvastatin 20 mg/day - 64.52% and 47.89% of patients, respectively). Conclusion. Results showed growing level of doctor's adherence to actual recommendations on therapy and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, the level of adherence remains unsatisfactory and requires additional work with doctors

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° злоупотрСблСния участиСм Π² клиничСских исслСдованиях Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π· со стороны Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π²

    No full text
    This article discusses important problem of early phase clinical trials - over-volunteering. The overlapping or dual enrollment of healthy volunteers is a potential high risk not only to study subjects, but also to commercial sponsors because it could cause the delay in advancement of promising drug candidates. The problem of over-volunteering is payed special attention by clinical research professionals in foreign countries. Guidelines for early phase clinical trials recommend implementation of different control and prevention measures of multiple enrollment. The most effective instrument to prevent over-volunteering is considered to be a central internet-based registry of healthy volunteers. Such registries operate in various countries and differ in structure, scope of information collected, types of funding and management. The general operating principles of such registries are described on the example of TOPS data base. TOPS is Π° special system to prevent over-volunteering that is used by UK phase 1 units. In conclusion, authors urge regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies to approach this problem closely because over-volunteering is already a burning issue in our country. It is essential to improve relevant regulatory framework and launch central registries of healthy subjects with regard to international experience.Π’ настоящСй ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ клиничСских исслСдований Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π· - ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ злоупотрСблСния участиСм Π² исслСдованиях со стороны Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² (Β«ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅Β» волонтёрство). Π—Π»ΠΎΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ участиСм Π² клиничСских исслСдованиях нСсёт Π² сСбС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ риски Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ для самих Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π², Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ для Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‡ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², нанося послСдним ΠΎΡ‰ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΉ экономичСский ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Ρ€Π±. Π”Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ удСляСтся особоС Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ со стороны ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сообщСства Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… стран. Π’ Π·Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ…, Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ„Π°Π·Ρ‹ клиничСских исслСдований, прСдставлСны Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ контроля ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Β«ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» волонтёрства. НаиболСС эффСктивным инструмСнтом ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Ρ‹ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ элСктронныС рСгистры (Π±Π°Π·Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…) Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ созданы Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ ряда стран Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΡ‹ ΠΈ Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ АмСрики. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ этом рСгистры Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ структурС, ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΡ‘ΠΌΡƒ собираСмой ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ финансирования ΠΈ управлСния. На ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ систСмы TOPS, которая ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ 1-ΠΉ Ρ„Π°Π·Ρ‹ Π’Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, описан Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… рСгистров. Π’ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ рСгулятора ΠΈ фармацСвтичСскиС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ особоС Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ, ΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡˆΡƒΡŽ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ для отСчСствСнной ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ клиничСских исслСдований Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π·. НСобходимо ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π±Π°Π·Ρƒ, Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ аспСкт, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ рСгистры Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² с ΡƒΡ‡Ρ‘Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π°

    Secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among patients of different age groups with a history of myocardial infarction by the example of outpatient cardiology institution

    No full text
    Aim. To study secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among patients of different age groups with a history of myocardial infarction by the example of outpatient cardiology institution. Material and methods. Retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study was conducted by analyzing the medical records of 825 patients with a history of myocardial infarction, who visited the outpatient cardiology institution for the first time in 2011. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: younger than 60 years (n=308), and 60 years and older (n=517). Results. The population of elderly patients was more severe: significantly more often patients had disability and co-morbidities. The prevalence of the main modifiable risk factors could not be assessed fully due to the lack of information in patients' medical records. Elderly patients were significantly less likely to receive Ξ²-blockers (80.3%) and statins (63.8%). No significant differences were found in daily doses of the main prescribed preventive drugs between two groups. Conclusion. Secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among patients of different age groups could not be considered proper, as there is low level of attention to the modifiable risk factors and recommendation on their correction. A tendency to under-prescription of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors was revealed, as well as significantly lower number of recommendations for taking statins and Ξ²-adrenoblockers in the group of elderly patients

    Drug interchangeability: Clinical efficacy and safety

    No full text
    The paper deals with the problem of the interchangeability of brand-name and generic drugs. Touching upon official terminology and the normative documents that govern the registration of generics in Russia and foreign countries, the authors state that there is no concerted approach to estimating drug interchangeability, indicate that there are some disadvantages of using a method for proving the bioequivalence of the compared drugs as evidence for their therapeutic equivalence, and point out that Russia's legal regulation of drug circulation lacks attention to the proper use of generics. The problem of interchangeability is particularly acute when prescribing narrow therapeutic range drugs, including anticonvulsant drugs. The results of the investigations discussed in the article demonstrate the need for a very cautious approach to using generic drugs in the therapy of epilepsy due to the fact that the disease may worsen. The authors come to the conclusion that treatment with less expensive generic drugs is far from always more economical. The change from a brand-name for a generic drug should be carefully approached, basing on the data of properly designed and conducted studies of therapeutic equivalence

    ΠœΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· привСрТСнности спСциалистов ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° соврСмСнным ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌ ΠΊ фармакологичСскому Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ сСрдца

    No full text
    Aim. To study predictors of primary care physician adherence to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy of stable coronary artery disease. Material and methods. This pharmacoepidemiologic cross-sectional study was conducted in primary care setting of Moscow. 805 patients (mean age 68.9Β±9.9 years, males 51.4%) with established stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) were included. Demography, medical history, prescribed pharmacological treatment data were obtained. Physician adherence to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy (GRP) of SCAD was evaluated based on the Class I guideline recommendations. Pharmacotherapeutic guideline adherence index (PGAI) was introduced as composite quality indicator, calculated in line with "all-or-none" rule and in regard with documented contraindications. To search for predictors of adherence the patient population was divided in two groups by level of physician adherence measured by PGAI. Statistical analysis was performed by IBM SPSS Statistics 16.0, the level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results. The prescription rates of essential drug therapies of SCAD (regarding contraindications) were quite adequate: Beta-blockers/calcium channel blockers - 90,1%, acetylsalicylic acid/clopidogrel/oral anticoagulants - 95,7%, statins/ezetimibe - 86,3%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin II receptor blockers - 87,6%. 82,9% (n=667) of patients were prescribed treatment for SCAD in compliance with the guidelines. Suboptimal pharmacotherapy was identified in 17,1% (n=138) of patients. These groups were similar in sex distribution (males 50,4 vs. 56,5%; p=0,188). Mean age tended to be lower in GRP adherent group (68,5Β±9,9 vs. 70,6Β±10,0 years; p=0,052). Bivariable analysis showed that good adherence to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy was associated with higher prevalence of stable angina (66,4 vs. 53,6%; p=0,004), arterial hypertension (93,3 vs. 79,7%; p<0,001) and dyslipidemia (21,4 vs. 9,4%; p<0,001) and with lower prevalence of myocardial infarction (48,1 vs. 67,4%; p<0,001). Logistic multivariable regression model (gender, age, 6 medical history variables) identified 6 patient-related factors that were significantly associated with physician adherence to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy: Age (odds ratio [OR] 0,97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0,95-0,99; p=0,009), arterial hypertension (OR 3,89; 95%CI 2,19-6,90; p<0,001), dyslipidemia (OR 2,31; 95%CI 1,23-4,34; p=0,009), chronic heart failure (OR 1,95; 95%CI 1,06-3,61; p=0,032), revascularization (OR 2,14; 95%CI 1,33-3,45; p=0,002), myocardial infarction (OR 0,28; 95%CI 0,16-0,48; p<0,001). Conclusion. Primary care cardiologist adherence to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy of SCAD was satisfactory evaluated as 82,9% by composite indicator PGAI. Arterial hypertension, heart failure, dyslipidemia revascularization were predictors of better physician adherence. History of myocardial infarction and older age were risk factors of non-adherence. Identification of patient-related factors associated with underperformance may facilitate tailoring quality improvement interventions in primary care of coronary patients. Β© 2021 Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya. All rights reserved.ЦСль. Π˜Π·ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ привСрТСнности Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° клиничСским рСкомСндациям Π² области Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ сСрдца (Π˜Π‘Π‘). ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎ-поликлиничСском ΡƒΡ‡Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π³. ΠœΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Ρ‹ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ фармакоэпидСмиологичСскоС исслСдованиС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ срСза. Π’ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ 805 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (срСдний возраст 68,9Β±9,9 Π»Π΅Ρ‚; 51,4% ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½) с установлСнным Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π˜Π‘Π‘. РСгистрации ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„ΠΈΠΈ, мСдицинского Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π½Π° основании стСпСни соотвСтствия фактичСски Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСчСния основным полоТСниям клиничСских Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ (класс I). ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ фармакотСрапСвтичСский индСкс соотвСтствия клиничСским рСкомСндациям (ЀИБКР), рассчитываСмый согласно ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ «всС ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π³ΠΎΒ» ΠΈ с ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Для Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² привСрТСнности популяция ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ Π² соотвСтствии с ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ЀИБКР. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… для ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСчСния ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π˜Π‘Π‘ фармакологичСских Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏ (с ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ), Π½Π°Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡŒ Π½Π° достаточно ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅: Π±Π΅Ρ‚Π°-Π°Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹/Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΡ†ΠΈΠ΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² – 90,1%, ацСтилсалициловая кислота/ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π΅Π»/ΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ антикоагулянты – 95,7%, статины/эзСтимиб – 86,3%, ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ½-ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‰Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°/антагонисты Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ½Π° II – 87,6%. Богласно ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ЀИБКР 82,9% (n=667) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΈ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡŽ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΌ соотвСтствии с клиничСскими рСкомСндациями, 17,1% (n=138) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ фармакологичСскоС Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ с ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ. Π”Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ ΠΏΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ (ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ 50,4 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 56,5%; p=0,188), срСдний возраст ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π» Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ ΠΊ сниТСнию Π² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ с высокой фармакотСрапСвтичСской ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ (68,5Β±9,9 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 70,6Β±10,0 Π»Π΅Ρ‚; p=0,052). Π’ Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… этой ΠΆΠ΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ Ρ‡Π°Ρ‰Π΅ наблюдались ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ стСнокардия (66,4 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 53,6%; p=0,004), Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ гипСртСнзия (93,3 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 79,7%; p<0,001) ΠΈ дислипидСмия (21,4 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 9,4%; p<0,001), Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΅ – ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π° (48,1 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 67,4%; p<0,001). По Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ рСгрСссионного Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° (ΠΏΠΎΠ», возраст, 6 анамнСстичСских характСристик) ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ возраста ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° 1 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ сниТало ΡˆΠ°Π½ΡΡ‹ Π½Π° Π²Ρ‹ΡΠΎΠΊΡƒΡŽ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ΅Π²Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π° Π½Π° 3% (p=0,009). Π—Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΅ влияниС Π² качСствС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² выполнСния клиничСских Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ: Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ шансов [ОШ] 3,89; 95% Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π» [Π”Π˜] 2,19-6,90; p<0,001), дислипидСмии (ОШ 2,31; 95%Π”Π˜ 1,23-4,34; p=0,009), хроничСской сСрдСчной нСдостаточности (ОШ 1,95; 95%Π”Π˜ 1,06-3,61; p=0,032), рСваскуляризации ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π° Π² Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π΅ (ОШ 2,14; 95%Π”Π˜ 1,33-3,45; p=0,002), Π° Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π΅ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π° сниТало Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ высокой привСрТСнности (ОШ 0,28; 95%Π”Π˜ 0,16-0,48; p<0,001). Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ условиях Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ привСрТСнности Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ-ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² клиничСским рСкомСндациям оказался ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ, составив 82,9% ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ ЀИБКР. НаличиС Π² Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ, сСрдСчной нСдостаточности, дислипидСмии ΠΈ рСваскуляризации ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ°Π»ΠΎ Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ высокой фармакотСрапСвтичСской привСрТСнности спСциалистов, Π° пСрСнСсСнный ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π° ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ возраст сниТало. ВыявлСниС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ привСрТСнности Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΡƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ качСства фармакологичСского лСчСния ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π˜Π‘Π‘ Π² условиях ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π°

    Drug interchangeability: Clinical efficacy and safety

    No full text
    The paper deals with the problem of the interchangeability of brand-name and generic drugs. Touching upon official terminology and the normative documents that govern the registration of generics in Russia and foreign countries, the authors state that there is no concerted approach to estimating drug interchangeability, indicate that there are some disadvantages of using a method for proving the bioequivalence of the compared drugs as evidence for their therapeutic equivalence, and point out that Russia's legal regulation of drug circulation lacks attention to the proper use of generics. The problem of interchangeability is particularly acute when prescribing narrow therapeutic range drugs, including anticonvulsant drugs. The results of the investigations discussed in the article demonstrate the need for a very cautious approach to using generic drugs in the therapy of epilepsy due to the fact that the disease may worsen. The authors come to the conclusion that treatment with less expensive generic drugs is far from always more economical. The change from a brand-name for a generic drug should be carefully approached, basing on the data of properly designed and conducted studies of therapeutic equivalence

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° злоупотрСблСния участиСм Π² клиничСских исслСдованиях Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π· со стороны Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π²

    No full text
    This article discusses important problem of early phase clinical trials - over-volunteering. The overlapping or dual enrollment of healthy volunteers is a potential high risk not only to study subjects, but also to commercial sponsors because it could cause the delay in advancement of promising drug candidates. The problem of over-volunteering is payed special attention by clinical research professionals in foreign countries. Guidelines for early phase clinical trials recommend implementation of different control and prevention measures of multiple enrollment. The most effective instrument to prevent over-volunteering is considered to be a central internet-based registry of healthy volunteers. Such registries operate in various countries and differ in structure, scope of information collected, types of funding and management. The general operating principles of such registries are described on the example of TOPS data base. TOPS is Π° special system to prevent over-volunteering that is used by UK phase 1 units. In conclusion, authors urge regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies to approach this problem closely because over-volunteering is already a burning issue in our country. It is essential to improve relevant regulatory framework and launch central registries of healthy subjects with regard to international experience.Π’ настоящСй ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ клиничСских исслСдований Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π· - ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ злоупотрСблСния участиСм Π² исслСдованиях со стороны Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² (Β«ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅Β» волонтёрство). Π—Π»ΠΎΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ участиСм Π² клиничСских исслСдованиях нСсёт Π² сСбС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ риски Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ для самих Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π², Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ для Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‡ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², нанося послСдним ΠΎΡ‰ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΉ экономичСский ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Ρ€Π±. Π”Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ удСляСтся особоС Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ со стороны ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сообщСства Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… стран. Π’ Π·Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ…, Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ„Π°Π·Ρ‹ клиничСских исслСдований, прСдставлСны Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ контроля ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Β«ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» волонтёрства. НаиболСС эффСктивным инструмСнтом ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Ρ‹ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ элСктронныС рСгистры (Π±Π°Π·Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…) Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ созданы Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ ряда стран Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΡ‹ ΠΈ Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ АмСрики. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ этом рСгистры Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ структурС, ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΡ‘ΠΌΡƒ собираСмой ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ финансирования ΠΈ управлСния. На ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ систСмы TOPS, которая ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ 1-ΠΉ Ρ„Π°Π·Ρ‹ Π’Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, описан Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… рСгистров. Π’ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ рСгулятора ΠΈ фармацСвтичСскиС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ особоС Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡƒ, ΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡˆΡƒΡŽ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ для отСчСствСнной ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ клиничСских исслСдований Ρ€Π°Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ„Π°Π·. НСобходимо ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π±Π°Π·Ρƒ, Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ аспСкт, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ рСгистры Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡ†Π΅Π² с ΡƒΡ‡Ρ‘Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π°

    Five-Year dynamics of secondary prevention in patients with stable angina at specialized out-patient level in Moscow (Pharmacoepidemiology Study)

    No full text
    Aim. To assess five-year trend in terms of specialists' adherence to guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with stable angina on the level of out-patient specialized healthcare institution in Moscow. Material and methods. Two-stage retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study was conducted. The object of the study - patient medical records. At the first stage of the study medical records of 2915 patients with stable angina visited the healthcare institution for the first time in 2006 were included; at the second stage - medical records of 1633 patients with stable angina with primary visit in 2011. Results. Over the five-year period prescription rates of drugs improving prognosis in patients with stable angina significantly increased: antiplatelets - up to 82.7%, beta-blockers - up to 74.3%, statins - up to 45.6%. Despite of no changes registered in prescription rate of the ACE inhibitors, marked increase up to 14.7% in prescription rate of angiotensin receptor blockers was revealed. In the prescription structure of pharmacological groups changes were detected concerning the preferred choice of a specific drug. Due to implementation of dual antiplatelet therapy into clinical practice a reduced number of recommendations of acetylsalicylic acid as monotherapy (down to 93.0%) and increased - in combination with clopidogrel (up to 5.4%) was registered at the second stage of the study. Over a five-year period bisoprolol (55.0%) occupied the leading position in the group of beta-blockers. Metoprolol's prescription rate decreased to 27.4%. Prescription rate of atenolol decreased down to 3.1%, while that of nebivolol increased up to 8.3%. When choosing among statins specialists recommended significantly more often atorvastatin (up to 52.9%). In the group of ACE inhibitors three drugs preserved their leading positions. Meanwhile the number of recommendations of enalapril increased up to 50.8%, perindopril - up to 24.1%. Analysis of prescribed doses revealed significant increase in recommendations of specific drugs in higher daily doses: acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg - up to 71.1%, simvastatin and atorvastatin 20 mg - up to 60.5% and 41.9%, respectively. When prescribing beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors specialists continued to use minimal and medium therapeutic doses, possibly due to dose titration in patients with comorbidities. Conclusion. Study results demonstrated positive trend in terms of specialists' adherence to guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with stable angina. However, a number of problem aspects were identified that require further optimization of medical and preventive measures in healthcare institutions. Β© 2018, Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya
    corecore