Acidic preconditioning improves the proangiogenic responses of endothelial colony forming cells

Objective: Acidosis is present in several pathological conditions where vasculogenesis takes place including ischemia, tumor growth and wound healing. We have previously demonstrated that acidosis induces human CD34+ cell apoptosis. Considering that endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFC) are a subpopulation of CD34+ cells and key players in vasculogenesis, in the present study we investigated the effect of acidosis on the survival and functionality of ECFC. Approach and results: Endothelial colony-forming cells obtained by differentiation of human cord blood CD34+ cells in endothelial growth medium-2 for 14–21 days were exposed at pH 7.4, 7.0 or 6.6. We found that acidosis failed to induce ECFC apoptosis and, although an early reduction in proliferation, chemotaxis, wound healing and capillary-like tubule formation was observed, once the medium pH was restored to 7.4, ECFC proliferation and tubulogenesis were augmented. Stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF1)-driven migration and chemokine receptor type 4 surface expression were also increased. The maximal proangiogenic effect exerted by acidic preconditioning was observed after 6 h at pH 6.6. Furthermore, preconditioned ECFC showed an increased ability to promote tissue revascularization in a murine model of hind limb ischemia. Immunoblotting assays showed that acidosis activated AKT and ERK1/2 and inhibited p38 pathways. Proliferation rises triggered by acidic preconditioning were no longer observed after AKT or ERK1/2 inhibition, whereas p38 suppression not only mimicked but also potentiated the effect of acidosis on ECFC tubule formation abilities. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that acidic preconditioning greatly increases ECFC-mediated angiogenesis in vitro including ECFC proliferation, tubulogenesis and SDF1-driven chemotaxis and is a positive regulator of microvessel formation in vivo.Fil: Mena, Hebe Agustina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Lokajczyk, Anna. Université Paris Descartes; Francia. Inserm; FranciaFil: Dizier, Blandine. Inserm; FranciaFil: Strier, Sergio E.. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Hospital "Bernardino Rivadavia"; ArgentinaFil: Voto, Liliana S.. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Hospital "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Boisson Vidal, Catherine. Université Paris Descartes; Francia. Inserm; FranciaFil: Schattner, Mirta Ana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Negrotto, Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; Argentin

A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy

Background: Twin birth is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton birth. It is unclear whether planned cesarean section results in a lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy.\ud \ud Methods: We randomly assigned women between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation with twin pregnancy and with the first twin in the cephalic presentation to planned cesarean section or planned vaginal delivery with cesarean only if indicated. Elective delivery was planned between 37 weeks 5 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, with the fetus or infant as the unit of analysis for the statistical comparison.\ud \ud Results: A total of 1398 women (2795 fetuses) were randomly assigned to planned cesarean delivery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to planned vaginal delivery. The rate of cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal-delivery group. Women in the planned-cesarean-delivery group delivered earlier than did those in the planned-vaginal-delivery group (mean number of days from randomization to delivery, 12.4 vs. 13.3; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the composite primary outcome between the planned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery group (2.2% and 1.9%, respectively; odds ratio with planned cesarean delivery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.74; P = 0.49).\ud \ud Conclusion: In twin pregnancy between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation, with the first twin in the cephalic presentation, planned cesarean delivery did not significantly decrease or increase the risk of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, as compared with planned vaginal delivery