Diagnostic performance of the molecular BCR-ABL1 monitoring system may impact on inclusion of CML patients in stopping trials.

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the duration of deep molecular response (MR) before treatment cessation (MR4 or deeper, corresponding to BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.01% on the International Scale (IS)) is considered as a prognostic factor for treatment free remission in stopping trials. MR level determination is dependent on the sensitivity of the monitoring technique. Here, we compared a newly established TaqMan (TM) and our so far routinely used LightCycler (LC) quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR systems for their ability to achieve the best possible sensitivity in BCR-ABL1 monitoring. We have comparatively analyzed RNA samples from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 92 randomly chosen patients with CML resembling major molecular remission (MMR) or better and of 128 CML patients after treatment cessation (EURO-SKI stopping trial). While our LC system utilized ABL1, the TM system is based on GUSB as reference gene. We observed 99% concordance with respect to achievement of MMR. However, we found that 34 of the 92 patients monitored by TM/GUSB were re-classified to the next inferior MR log level, especially when LC/ABL1-based results were borderline to thresholds. Thirteen patients BCR-ABL1 negative in LC/ABL1 became positive after TM/GUSB analysis. In the 128 patients included in the EURO-SKI trial identical molecular findings were achieved for 114 patients. However, 14 patients were re-classified to the next inferior log-level by the TM/GUSB combination. Eight of these patients relapsed after treatment cessation; two of them were re-classified from MR4 to MMR and therefore did not meet inclusion criteria anymore. In conclusion, we consider both methods as comparable and interchangeable in terms of achievement of MMR and of longitudinal evaluation of clinical courses. However, in LC/ABL1 negative samples, slightly enhanced TM/GUSB sensitivity may lead to inferior classification of clinical samples in the context of TFR

High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML.

Blast crisis is one of the remaining challenges in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Whether additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) enable an earlier recognition of imminent blastic proliferation and a timelier change of treatment is unknown. One thousand five hundred and ten imatinib-treated patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML randomized in CML-study IV were analyzed for ACA/Ph+ and blast increase. By impact on survival, ACAs were grouped into high risk (+8, +Ph, i(17q), +17, +19, +21, 3q26.2, 11q23, -7/7q abnormalities; complex) and low risk (all other). The presence of high- and low-risk ACAs was linked to six cohorts with different blast levels (1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) in a Cox model. One hundred and twenty-three patients displayed ACA/Ph+ (8.1%), 91 were high risk. At low blast levels (1-15%), high-risk ACA showed an increased hazard to die compared to no ACA (ratios: 3.65 in blood; 6.12 in marrow) in contrast to low-risk ACA. No effect was observed at blast levels of 20-30%. Sixty-three patients with high-risk ACA (69%) died (n = 37) or were alive after progression or progression-related transplantation (n = 26). High-risk ACA at low blast counts identify end-phase CML earlier than current diagnostic systems. Mortality was lower with earlier treatment. Cytogenetic monitoring is indicated when signs of progression surface or response to therapy is unsatisfactory

Co-Occurrence of Familial Mediterranean Fever and Hematologic Malignancies: Case Report Series

Introduction: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder primarily found among individuals of Mediterranean descent, including Armenians, Italians, Greeks, Arabs, Turks and Jews. In the Armenian population, approximately 90% of FMF cases are associated with three main mutations (M694V, V726A, and M680I) in two alleles of MEFV gene, while more than 300 MEFV variants have been reported worldwide. The homozygous M694V genotype is associated with frequent renal failure due to amyloidosis. Clinical manifestations of FMF include periodic attacks of diffuse serositis with pain and fever that are treated with colchicine or biologic therapy. There is a scarcity of data on patients with FMF and hematologic malignancies. Limited data makes it difficult to generate evidence-based recommendations for the management of these patients, which is mostly based on expert opinions or few case reports. Here we report the case series of patients from Armenia with simultaneous presence of FMF and hematologic malignancies (FMFHM) and evaluate their management challenges. Methods: Data was collected from the Armenian National Registry of Blood Disorders, at the Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, and through personal interviews conducted with each patient. Hematology Center is the only institution in Armenia managing hematologic malignancies. We have analyzed 8 patients diagnosed with both FMFHM during 2000-2020, treated in the pediatric (1 patient) and adult (7 patients) hematology departments. Results: 8 patients with FMFHM were identified, from which 4 were diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), 2 with acute leukemia (AL), and 2 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The median age of patients was 46, range 20-60 years. Only 5 (62.5%) of patients were regularly taking colchicine for FMF, while the rest refused it. Four MPN patients received treatment only with oral medications (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, hydroxyurea). Autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) was performed in 1 NHL patient after indicated 1 st and 2 nd line immuno-chemotherapy. Another 2 AL patients and one NHL patient received protocol-based respective chemotherapy regimens. Moderate gastrointestinal (GI) complications (e.g., epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, intestinal discomfort) was experienced by 7 (87.5%) patients. Allergic reactions (e.g., moderate skin rash, itching) were seen in 5 patient (62.5%), of which one developed severe anaphylactic shock. A patient with FMF and PMF had ischemic stroke caused by thrombi. Arterial hypertension occurred in 3 (37.5%). Only in one patient reduction of colchicine dosage was performed (1mg/day was reduced to 0.6mg/d), because of interaction with imatinib. The rest of patients received chemotherapy and colchicine treatment as indicated. All 8 patients are alive, 5 of them are in hematologic or molecular remission, two of which received concurrent colchicine treatment. One patient in remission developed renal failure due to FMF (colchicine was refused). Two patients with MPN treated with colchicine experienced disease stabilization. Conclusion: In conclusion, the concurrent appearance of FMFHM may potentially increase the risk of GI side effects, allergic complications, and arterial hypertension, however definitive conclusions require further investigations in larger patient cohorts. While the overall treatment responses were largely positive, the association between MEFV and HM mutations warrants deeper exploration to provide more precise drug administration recommendations for colchicine and cancer medications. Future studies in this area will contribute to a better understanding of the interplay between these conditions and guide optimal treatment strategies

Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN):Multi-Center Collaboration and Global Registry Program

Background BPDCN is a rare, aggressive hematologic malignancy derived from the precursors of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC), typically presenting with primary cutaneous dissemination and involvement of bone marrow (BM) as well as extramedullary sites including central nervous system (CNS). In 2008, it was recognized by WHO as a distinct entity and is now recognized under Myeloid/Histiocytic/Dendritic neoplasms in the 2022 5th edition update of WHO Classification. Since the recognition of this unique entity, recent efforts have been put forward for greater understanding and international collaboration, however usually focused on North America and Europe(Pemmaraju at al and Pagano et al), with this current effort representing the largest known international efforts including more parts of the world, including Asia, Middle East and Africa. Objective Due to its historical rarity and heterogeneous presentation of disease, as well as differences in availability of therapies across geo-locations, at present there is no worldwide consensus on the management of BPDCN. The outcomes remain poor, and the optimal therapy of disease remains to be determined. Launched on July 1st, 2022, the aim of our global registry is through a multi-center international collaboration to build a large database of patients with BPDCN in order to generate data-driven diagnostic and treatment recommendations. Materials and Methods The registry collects retrospective and prospective data on clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment regimens and outcomes of patients diagnosed with BPDCN after January 1st, 2010. The data is collected globally through eCRF and Excel form. The Registry is included in ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT05430971). Results Through July 15 th, 2023, 15 centers from 11 countries (Armenia, Canada, Cyprus, Egypt, Georgia, India, Italy, Taiwan, Turkey, UK and USA) have joined the registry and another 13 centers from USA, UK, Egypt, Iraq, Canada, Netherlands, Tajikistan, Czech Republic, Guatemala, Brazil, Serbia, Germany are onboarding. 27 retrospective and 2 prospective pts are currently included in the registry. 76 % of pts are male, in keeping with historical expectation BPDCN. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years (4-97). In 90 % of patients the tumor cells were triple positive with CD4+, CD56+, CD123+ immunophenotype. 53.6% of patients presented with cutaneous manifestation. 21% of pts received the initial treatment with AML-based regimens, 66% with ALL-based and 7% with lymphoma-based regimens. 21% of pts underwent alloSCT. 35% of pts were diagnosed after 2018, only 1 patient has received tagraxofusp, a CD123-directed therapy that received FDA approval for previously untreated or relapsed/refractory BPDCN in 2018(Pemmaraju N et al NEJM 2019). 69 % of patients achieved complete response (CR), from which 90 % were treated with ALL-based regimens. 52% of patients experienced relapse. Conclusion Current analysis of a 29-patient worldwide cohort of BPDCN demonstrates a high degree of heterogeneity in treatment regimens based on a multitude of considerations including geographic, socio-economic, drug availability, and varied clinical preferences. The outcome of ALL-based treatment was superior as compared to AML-based, but relapse rate remained high. Further global collaboration is needed to collect additional data and to identify the best diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for this challenging disease

Correction: High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML (Leukemia, (2020), 34, 8, (2074-2086), 10.1038/s41375-020-0826-9)

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper