Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer:A systematic review

Purpose: The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results: Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23–59%) than poor responders (range 1.5–17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI. Conclusion: DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response

A Novel Liquid Fiducial Marker in Esophageal Cancer Image Guided Radiation Therapy: Technical Feasibility and Visibility on Imaging

Purpose: To assess the technical feasibility of injection, visibility on imaging modalities, and positional stability of a novel liquid fiducial marker (ie, BioXmark) for radiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: First, the visibility on imaging of different volumes of the liquid marker was analyzed ex vivo in porcine tissue (ie, on computed tomography [CT], cone beam CT (CBCT), and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Next, for the in vivo part, the liquid fiducial markers were injected under endoscopic (ultrasound) guidance in 10 patients with curable esophageal cancer. The technical feasibility of the injection procedure and the clinical performance (ie, visibility and positional stability on imaging) were evaluated. Planning CT, daily CBCT, and serial MRI images (before, during, and after chemoradiation therapy in a subset of 3 patients) were acquired. Results: Ex vivo, the optimal volume for good visibility without artifacts was 0.1 mL per injected marker. In vivo, a total of 28 markers were injected in 10 patients (range, 0.025-0.1 mL). No adverse effects were identified. The first 2 cases (4 markers) were considered as learning cases. A total of 19 of 24 of the liquid markers (79%) were visible on CT, 3 of 4 (75%) on MRI, and 19 of 24 (79%) on the first CBCT. All markers with an injected volume of >0.05 mL were visible on the different imaging modalities. Positional stability analysis on CBCT identified no time trend during the radiation therapy course. No artifacts could be detected for liquid marker volumes of 0.05 and 0.025 mL in CT or CBCT. Conclusions: Injection of a liquid fiducial marker for esophageal cancer radiation therapy is technically feasible with no adverse events identified. Volumes of >0.05 mL have an appropriate visibility on CT, CBCT, and MRI, with an excellent positional stability. Liquid fiducial markers are therefore promising for use in image guided radiation therapy

Advanced Age is Not a Contraindication for Treatment with Curative Intent in Esophageal Cancer

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare long-Term outcomes between younger and older (70 y and above) esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent. Materials and Methods: Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional recurrence-free interval were compared between older (70 y and above) and younger (below 70 y) esophageal cancer patients treated between 1998 and 2013. Treatment consisted of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy: 36 to 50.4 Gy in 18 to 28 fractions combined with 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin or carboplatin/paclitaxel. Results: The study comprised 253 patients, of whom 76 were 70 years and older. Median age was 64 years (range, 41 to 83). Most patients had stage II-IIIA disease (83%). Planned treatment was neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with surgery for 169 patients (41 patients aged 70 y and older) and definitive chemoradiotherapy for 84 patients (31 patients aged 70 y and older). The compliance to radiotherapy was 92%, with no difference between older and younger patients. In 33 patients (13 patients aged 70 y and older) planned surgery was not performed. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Three-year OS was 42%. The multivariable analysis showed no statistical difference in OS or in DFS comparing older and younger patients: OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.28), DFS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.60-1.25). Elderly showed a longer locoregional recurrence-free interval; HR, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.30-0.92; P=0.02) and a higher pathologic complete response rate (50% vs. 25%; P=0.02). Conclusions: Long-Term outcomes of older esophageal cancer patients (70 y and above) selected for treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy were comparable with the outcomes of their younger counterparts. Advanced age alone should not be a contraindication for potentially curative chemoradiotherapy-based treatment in esophageal cancer patients

Added value of MRI to endoscopic and endosonographic response assessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

Objectives In order to select oesophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for organ-preserving treatment instead of surgery, a high diagnostic accuracy is required. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether MRI had additional value to gastroscopy with biopsies and endosonographic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) for the detection of residual tumour after nCRT. Methods Twenty-two patients with oesophageal cancer eligible for nCRT followed by oesophagectomy were prospectively included. All patients underwent (T2- and diffusion-weighted) MRI and gastroscopy+EUS before and after nCRT. Histopathology after oesophagectomy was the reference standard with pathological complete response (pCR) defined as ypT0N0. Diagnostic performance regarding the detection of residual tumour was calculated for gastroscopic biopsies and for EUS-FNA without and with MRI. Results Nineteen of the 22 patients (86%) did not achieve pCR after nCRT (7 ypT+N+, 11 ypT+N0, 1 ypT0N+). Biopsies detected residual tumour in 6 of 18 ypT+ patients. After adding MRI, 16 of 18 residual tumours were assessed correctly. EUS-FNA detected 3 out of 8 ypN+ patients, while MRI did not improve detection. Overall, adding MRI improved sensitivity for detection of residual tumour to 89% (17 of 19) from 47% (9 of 19) with endoscopic biopsies and EUS-FNA only. Conclusion In this small study, the detection of residual tumour after nCRT in oesophageal cancer patients was improved by the addition of MRI to gastroscopy and EUS.</p

Hospital practice variation in the proportion of patients with esophagogastric cancer discussed during an expert multidisciplinary team meeting

Background: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) and especially MDTMs in which expert centres are involved (expert MDTMs) are a key element in adequate cancer care. However, variation among hospitals in the proportion of patients presented during an expert MDTM has been described. This study aims to investigate national practice variation in the proportion of patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer being discussed during an expert MDTM. Methods: Patients diagnosed with oesophageal or gastric cancer in 2018–2019 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 6,921). Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the association between patient, and tumour characteristics, and the probability to be discussed in an expert MDTM. Variation was analysed according to the hospital and region of diagnosis for: all patients, patients with a potentially curable (cT1-4A cTX, any cN, cM0) or incurable tumour stage (cT4b and/or cM1). Results: In total, 79% of patients were discussed during an expert MDTM, of whom 84% (n = 3,424) and 71% (n = 2,018) with potentially curable, or incurable oesophageal or gastric cancer, respectively. The proportion of patients discussed during an expert MDTM ranged from 54% to 98%, and 17% to 100% between hospitals for potentially curable and incurable patients, respectively (all p < 0.0001). Adjusted analyses showed significant hospital (all p < 0.0001), but no regional variation regarding the patients discussed during an expert MDTM. Conclusion: For patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer the probability of being discussed during an expert MDTM varies considerably according to the hospital of diagnosis

Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and F-18-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer

Objective Both the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) acquired by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and the standardized uptake value (SUV), acquired by 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT), are well-established functional parameters in cancer imaging. Currently, it is unclear whether these two markers provide complementary prognostic and predictive information in esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between ADC and SUV in patients with esophageal cancer. Materials and methods This prospective study included 76 patients with histologically proven esophageal cancer who underwent both DW-MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT examinations before treatment. The minimum and mean ADC values (ADC min and ADC mean) of the primary tumor were assessed on MRI. Similarly, the glucose metabolism was evaluated by the maximum and mean SUV (SUV max and SUV mean) in the same lesions on 18 F-FDG PET/CT images. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between tumor ADC and SUV values. Results The tumor ADC and SUV values as measures of cell density and glucose metabolism, respectively, showed negligible nonsignificant correlations (ADC min vs. SUV max: r=-0.087, P=0.457; ADC min vs. SUV mean: r=-0.105, P=0.369; ADC mean vs. SUV max: r=-0.099, P=0.349; ADC mean vs. SUV mean: r=-0.111, P=0.340). No differences in tumor ADC and SUV values were observed between the different histologic tumor types, stages, and differentiation grades. Conclusion This study indicates that tumor cellularity derived from DW-MRI and tumor metabolism measured by 18 F-FDG PET/CT are independent cellular phenomena in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer. Therefore, tumor ADC and SUV values may play complementary roles as imaging markers in the prediction of survival and evaluation of response to treatment in esophageal cancer

Legislative Documents

Also, variously referred to as: Senate bills; Senate documents; Senate legislative documents; legislative documents; and General Court documents

Gross Tumor Delineation in Esophageal Cancer on MRI Compared With 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Purpose: Current delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in esophageal cancer relies on computed tomography (CT) and combination with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). There is increasing interest in integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation treatment, which can potentially obviate CT- or FDG-PET/CT-based delineation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of target delineation on T2-weighted (T2W) MRI and T2W including diffusion-weighted MRI (T2W + DW-MRI) compared with current-practice FDG-PET/CT. Methods: Ten observers delineated primary esophageal tumor GTVs of 6 patients on FDG-PET/CT, T2W-MRI, and T2W + DW-MRI. GTVs, generalized conformity indices, in-slice delineation variation (root mean square), and standard deviations in the position of the most cranial and caudal delineated slice were calculated. Results: Delineations on MRI showed smaller GTVs compared with FDG-PET/CT-based delineations. The main variation was seen at the cranial and caudal border. No differences were observed in conformity indices (FDG-PET/CT, 0.68; T2W-MRI, 0.66; T2W + DW-MRI, 0.68) and in-slice variation (root mean square, 0.13 cm on FDG-PET/CT; 0.10 cm on T2W-MRI; 0.14 cm on T2W + DW-MRI). In the 2 tumors involving the gastroesophageal junction, addition of DW-MRI to T2W-MRI significantly decreased caudal border variation. Conclusions: MRI-based target delineation of the esophageal tumor is feasible with interobserver variability comparable to that with FDG-PET/CT, despite limited experience with delineation on MRI. Most variation was seen at cranial-caudal borders, and addition of DW-MRI to T2W-MRI may reduce caudal delineation variation of gastroesophageal junction tumors

Preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI : a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer could enable omission of esophagectomy in patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR). This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography ( 18F-FDG PET/CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) during and after nCRT to predict pathologic response in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multicenter prospective study, patients scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy for esophageal cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI scanning before the start of nCRT, during nCRT, and before esophagectomy. Response to nCRT was based on histopathologic evaluation of the resection specimen. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI parameters were compared between patients with pCR and non-pCR groups. Multivariable ridge regression analyses with bootstrapped c-indices were performed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI. RESULTS: pCR was found in 26.1% of 69 patients. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters after nCRT (Δ standardized uptake value [SUV] mean,postP = .016, and Δ total lesion glycolysis postP = .024), as well as changes in DW-MRI parameters during nCRT (Δ apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] duringP = .008) were significantly different between pCR and non-pCR. A c-statistic of 0.84 was obtained for a model with ΔADC during, ΔSUV mean,post, and histology in classifying patients as pCR (versus 0.82 for ΔADC during and 0.79 for ΔSUV mean,post alone). CONCLUSIONS: Changes on 18F-FDG PET/CT after nCRT and early changes on DW-MRI during nCRT can help identify pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer. Moreover, 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI might be of complementary value in the assessment of pCR