554 research outputs found

    Director Characteristics and Firm Performance

    Get PDF
    The traditional methodology examining optimal boards relates a simple board variable� (e.g., independence or board demography) to firm performance, however, ig- noring other board characteristics.� This paper investigates how the education and business� experience of directors affect firm� performance. The sample consists of 1,574 directorships from 224 listed firms� in Switzerland.� Using� OLS� and including control variables, the results show that graduates of minor Swiss universities are negatively related to Tobin’s Q, and industrial knowledge and Tobin’s Q are nega- tively� correlated if the firm� has more divisions.�� In� addition, director fixed effects (or unobserved characteristics) are significant, but improve the explanatory power of the models only by 5 percent.Corporate governance: Board of directors; Director characteristics, Education and business experience

    Boards: Independent and Committed Directors?

    Get PDF
    Regulators and shareholders are calling for independent directors. Independent directors, however, have numerous external professional commitments. Using� To- bin’s Q as an approximation� of market valuation and controlling for endogeneity, our empirical analysis reveals that neither external commitments are negatively related to firm� performance nor is independence positively related to it. However,� more precise analyses show that executive directors and family representatives have a positive relationship with Tobin’s Q. In contrast, external executives are negatively correlated with firm valuation. Moreover, the study indicates that the frequency and duration of meetings are negatively affected by the fraction of executive directors on the board. Insiders potentially reduce the need for meetings because of their specialist competence.� The results invalidate rules� advocating independent directors and oppose the engagement of directors with external commitments.Corporate governance: Board of directors; Board independence; Board busyness; External commitments

    Foundations of Corporate Governance

    Get PDF
    This paper outlines the foundations of corporate governance. The discussion includes a review on the modern corporation, transaction costs theory, agency costs theory, legal investor protection, investor protection by corporate governance and its various mechanisms, as well as an overview of the determinants of corporate governance

    Mehr Wissen im Verwaltungsrat

    Get PDF

    Mehr Transparenz wünschenswert

    Get PDF

    Revisoren müssen unabhängig sein

    Get PDF

    Stromkonzerne auf dem Prüfstand

    Get PDF

    Boards: Independent and Committed Directors?

    Get PDF
    Regulators and shareholders are calling for independent directors. Independent directors, however, have numerous external professional commitments. Using To- bin’s Q as an approximation of market valuation and controlling for endogeneity, our empirical analysis reveals that neither external commitments are negatively related to firm performance nor is independence positively related to it. However, more precise analyses show that executive directors and family representatives have a positive relationship with Tobin’s Q. In contrast, external executives are negatively correlated with firm valuation. Moreover, the study indicates that the frequency and duration of meetings are negatively affected by the fraction of executive directors on the board. Insiders potentially reduce the need for meetings because of their specialist competence. The results invalidate rules advocating independent directors and oppose the engagement of directors with external commitments

    Does culture affect corporate governance?

    Get PDF
    The legal environment is one important determinant of corporate governance. However, within legal families, also cultural differences can explain the level of corporate governance to some extent. We analyze this relationship for the case of Switzerland. Swiss firms are mainly located in two cultural areas, the German and French speaking parts of Switzerland. Swiss federal law is equal in both regions which allows us to investigate the effect of cultural differences on corporate governance. Although we only find few differences, we observe that board composition is significantly driven by language-related factors: French-speaking directors are prevalent in Swiss French boards and German-speaking directors in Swiss German boards. More importantly, however, boards of these two parts of Switzerland are more likely to be structured as in their respective neighboring countries. Furthermore, in the French part, transfer restrictions of shares are more common
    • …
    corecore