Mechanistic early phase clinical pharmacology studies with disease-modifying drugs for neurodegenerative disorders

Degenerative diseases of the nervous system, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and ALS, are severe, progressive and ultimately fatal. Most existing drugs for these neurodegenerative diseases only temporarily relieve symptoms, increase mobility or relieve pain, but do not slow disease progression.This dissertation describes a method to efficiently carry out the development of new drugs that could inhibit disease progression in neurodegenerative diseases. Namely, by using pharmacodynamic biomarkers. These are signaling substances to measure the magnitude of a drug response.These biomarkers can be used in early clinical-pharmacological studies in healthy volunteers or small groups of patients to select the best drug candidates and their expected therapeutic doses as early as possible in the development stage. This helps to make informed choices to advance a potential new drug into large and expensive phase 2 and 3 (registration) studies, or conversely to discontinue development of a non-potential drug as early as possible. This biomarker method was applied in this dissertation to investigate 2 new drugs that could potentially slow disease progression in Alzheimer's and ALS (a RIPK1 inhibitor) or Parkinson's disease (a LRRK2 inhibitor). The research results from multiple early clinical-pharmacological studies in healthy volunteers and patients described in this thesis form the basis for larger phase 2 and 3 follow-up studies that have now been initiated with ALS patients and Parkinson's disease patients. Both with the goal of confirming whether these agents can indeed slow disease progression, which would represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of these conditions.Centre for Human Drug Research, Denali Therapeutics Inc., Sanofi-GenzymeLUMC / Geneeskund

Viral clearance, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ensovibep in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: a phase 2a, open-label, single-dose escalation study

AimTo assess viral clearance, pharmacokinetics, tolerability and symptom evolution following ensovibep administration in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.MethodsIn this open-label, first-in-patient study a single dose of either 225 mg (n = 6) or 600 mg (n = 6) of ensovibep was administered intravenously in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined (90-day period). Pharmacodynamic assessments consisted of viral load (qPCR and cultures) and symptom questionnaires. Immunogenicity against ensovibep and SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing activity were determined. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout a 13-week follow-up.ResultsBoth doses showed similar pharmacokinetics (first-order) with mean half-lives of 14 (SD 5.0) and 13 days (SD 5.7) for the 225- and 600-mg groups, respectively. Pharmacologically relevant serum concentrations were maintained in all subjects for at least 2 weeks postdose, regardless of possible immunogenicity against ensovibep. Viral load changes from baseline at day 15 were 5.1 (SD 0.86) and 5.3 (SD 2.2) log10 copies/mL for the 225- and 600-mg doses, respectively. COVID-19 symptom scores decreased from 10.0 (SD 4.1) and 11.3 (SD 4.0) to 1.6 (SD 3.1) and 3.3 (SD 2.4) in the first week for the 225- and 600-mg groups, respectively. No anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity was present predose and all patients had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at day 91. Adverse events were of mild-to-moderate severity, transient and self-limiting.ConclusionSingle-dose intravenous administration of 225 or 600 mg of ensovibep appeared safe and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Ensovibep showed favourable pharmacokinetics in patients and the pharmacodynamic results warrant further research in a larger phase 2/3 randomized-controlled trail.Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcome (Anesthesiology/Intensive Care

Mechanistic early phase clinical pharmacology studies with disease-modifying drugs for neurodegenerative disorders

Degenerative diseases of the nervous system, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and ALS, are severe, progressive and ultimately fatal. Most existing drugs for these neurodegenerative diseases only temporarily relieve symptoms, increase mobility or relieve pain, but do not slow disease progression.This dissertation describes a method to efficiently carry out the development of new drugs that could inhibit disease progression in neurodegenerative diseases. Namely, by using pharmacodynamic biomarkers. These are signaling substances to measure the magnitude of a drug response.These biomarkers can be used in early clinical-pharmacological studies in healthy volunteers or small groups of patients to select the best drug candidates and their expected therapeutic doses as early as possible in the development stage. This helps to make informed choices to advance a potential new drug into large and expensive phase 2 and 3 (registration) studies, or conversely to discontinue development of a non-potential drug as early as possible. This biomarker method was applied in this dissertation to investigate 2 new drugs that could potentially slow disease progression in Alzheimer's and ALS (a RIPK1 inhibitor) or Parkinson's disease (a LRRK2 inhibitor). The research results from multiple early clinical-pharmacological studies in healthy volunteers and patients described in this thesis form the basis for larger phase 2 and 3 follow-up studies that have now been initiated with ALS patients and Parkinson's disease patients. Both with the goal of confirming whether these agents can indeed slow disease progression, which would represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of these conditions.</p

Targeting for Success: Demonstrating Proof-of-Concept with Mechanistic Early Phase Clinical Pharmacology Studies for Disease-Modification in Neurodegenerative Disorders

The clinical failure rate for disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) that slow or stop disease progression has been nearly 100% for the major neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs), with many compounds failing in expensive and time-consuming phase 2 and 3 trials for lack of efficacy. Here, we critically review the use of pharmacological and mechanistic biomarkers in early phase clinical trials of DMTs in NDDs, and propose a roadmap for providing early proof-of-concept to increase R&D productivity in this field of high unmet medical need. A literature search was performed on published early phase clinical trials aimed at the evaluation of NDD DMT compounds using MESH terms in PubMed. Publications were selected that reported an early phase clinical trial with NDD DMT compounds between 2010 and November 2020. Attention was given to the reported use of pharmacodynamic (mechanistic and physiological response) biomarkers. A total of 121 early phase clinical trials were identified, of which 89 trials (74%) incorporated one or multiple pharmacodynamic biomarkers. However, only 65 trials (54%) used mechanistic (target occupancy or activation) biomarkers to demonstrate target engagement in humans. The most important categories of early phase mechanistic and response biomarkers are discussed and a roadmap for incorporation of a robust biomarker strategy for early phase NDD DMT clinical trials is proposed. As our understanding of NDDs is improving, there is a rise in potentially disease-modifying treatments being brought to the clinic. Further increasing the rational use of mechanistic biomarkers in early phase trials for these (targeted) therapies can increase R&D productivity with a quick win/fast fail approach in an area that has seen a nearly 100% failure rate to date

The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic on the conduct of clinical trials: Return to normalcy by considering the practical impact of a structured ethical analysis

During the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic many clinical trials were abruptly halted. Measures to contain the pandemic are currently taking effect and societies in general and healthcare systems in particular are considering how to return to normalcy. This opens up the discussion when and how clinical trials should be restarted while the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet resolved, and what should happen in case of a resurgence of the virus in the coming months. This article uses the four ethical principles framework as a structured approach to come to a set of practical, ethically grounded guidelines for halting and relaunching clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. The framework applied provides a structured approach for all clinical trials stakeholders and thereby prevents unclear reasoning in a complex situation. While it is essential to prevent the virus from resurging and focus on developing a COVID-19 treatment as soon as possible, it is just as important to our society that we continue developing new drugs for other conditions. In this article we argue that the situation for clinical trials is not essentially different from the pre-COVID-19 era and that an overcautious approach will have negative consequences.Stress-related psychiatric disorders across the life spa

Increased Tacrolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients With COVID-19: Inflammation-Driven Downregulation of Metabolism as a Potential Mechanism

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease compared to the general population. This is partly driven by their use of immunosuppressive therapy, which influences inflammatory responses and viral loads. Current guidelines suggest to withdraw mycophenolate while calcineurin inhibitors are often continued during a COVID-19 infection. However, clinical signs of calcineurin toxicity have been described in multiple COVID-19 positive KTRs. In this report we describe the course of tacrolimus exposure prior to, during, and post COVID-19 in observations from three clinical cases as well as four KTRs from a controlled trial population. We postulate inflammation driven downregulation of the CYP3A metabolism as a potential mechanism for higher tacrolimus exposure. To mitigate the risk of tacrolimus overexposure and toxicity therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in KTRs with COVID-19 both in the in-, out-patient and home monitoring setting

Safety, pharmacokinetics and target engagement of novel RIPK1 inhibitor SAR443060 (DNL747) for neurodegenerative disorders: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I/Ib studies in healthy subjects and patients

RIPK1 is a master regulator of inflammatory signaling and cell death and increased RIPK1 activity is observed in human diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). RIPK1 inhibition has been shown to protect against cell death in a range of preclinical cellular and animal models of diseases. SAR443060 (previously DNL747) is a selective, orally bioavailable, central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant, small-molecule, reversible inhibitor of RIPK1. In three early-stage clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients with AD or ALS (NCT03757325 and NCT03757351), SAR443060 distributed into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after oral administration and demonstrated robust peripheral target engagement as measured by a reduction in phosphorylation of RIPK1 at serine 166 (pRIPK1) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to baseline. RIPK1 inhibition was generally safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients with AD or ALS. Taken together, the distribution into the CSF after oral administration, the peripheral proof-of-mechanism, and the safety profile of RIPK1 inhibition to date, suggest that therapeutic modulation of RIPK1 in the CNS is possible, conferring potential therapeutic promise for AD and ALS, as well as other neurodegenerative conditions. However, SAR443060 development was discontinued due to long-term nonclinical toxicology findings, although these nonclinical toxicology signals were not observed in the short duration dosing in any of the three early-stage clinical trials. The dose-limiting toxicities observed for SAR443060 preclinically have not been reported for other RIPK1-inhibitors, suggesting that these toxicities are compound-specific (related to SAR443060) rather than RIPK1 pathway-specific