Practical differences between luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: perspectives across the spectrum of care

Background:Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists is well established for the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer. As clear differences in efficacy, safety, or tolerability between the available LHRH agonists are lacking, the healthcare management team needs to look to practical differences between the formulations when selecting therapy for their patients. Moreover, as the economic burden of prostate cancer rises alongside earlier diagnosis and improved survival, the possibility for cost savings by using products with specific features is growing in importance.Methods:A review was conducted to summarize the information on the different LHRH agonist formulations currently available and offer insight into their relative benefits and disadvantages from the perspectives of physicians, a pharmacist, and a nurse.Results:The leuprorelin acetate and goserelin acetate solid implants have the advantage of being ready to use with no requirement for refrigeration, whereas powder and microsphere formulations have to be reconstituted and have specific storage or handling constraints. The single-step administration of solid implants, therefore, has potential to reduce labor time and associated costs. Dosing frequency is another key consideration, as administering the injection provides an opportunity for face-to-face interaction between the patient and healthcare professionals to ensure therapy is optimized and give reassurance to patients. Prostate cancer patients are reported to prefer 3- or 6-monthly dosing, which aligns with the monitoring frequency recommended in European Association of Urology guidelines and has been shown to result in reduced annual costs compared with 1-month formulations.Conclusions:A number of practical differences exist between the different LHRH agonist preparations available, which may impact on clinical practice. It is important for healthcare providers to be aware and carefully consider these differences when selecting treatments for their prostate cancer patients.Peer reviewe

Gold seed fiducials in analysis of linear and rotational displacement of the prostate bed

Background and purpose This study aimed to investigate the magnitude of interfraction prostate bed motion during radiotherapy using both the implanted gold seed fiducials and the soft tissue registration and to define reasonable planning target volume (PTV) margins for different localization methods. Material and methods Thirteen prostatectomized prostate cancer patients, after implanting four gold seed fiducials into their prostate bed, were imaged daily using a pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Linear and the rotational prostate bed motion (PBM) was measured for 466 CBCTs. Results The linear PBM mean and standard deviation values in millimeters are 0.0±0.5, 0.7±2.1 and 0.8±1.6 in the LR, SI and AP axes, respectively. In 20% of the fractions the rotation of the prostate bed in sagittal plane exceeds ±6° and in 5% it exceeds ±10° from the position on the planning CT. In the transversal and coronal planes 1% and 2% of it exceeds ±6°. The PTV margins are 2.4, 6.5 and 6.6mm in the LR, SI and AP axes, respectively, if imaging is performed for the first three treatment fractions. Conclusion The linear PBM is largest in the SI and AP axis, whereas the rotation is largest in the sagittal plane. Bone localization during the first three treatment fractions can reduce PTV margins by 52%, 18% and 10% in the LR, SI and AP axes, respectively, whereas in daily CBCT the use of the gold seed fiducials seems profitable. Keywords: Prostate bed motion, Gold seed fiducials, Rotation of the prostate bed, Margin, Prostate cancerPeer reviewe

Eturauhassyövän kehittyvä sädehoito

English summar

Serum tumour associated trypsin inhibitor, as a biomarker for survival in renal cell carcinoma : Scandinavian Journal of Urology

Abstract Objective Tumour associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) is a peptide that is a marker for several tumours. TATI may also behave as an acute phase reactant in severe inflammatory disease. Overexpression of TATI predicts an unfavourable outcome for many cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of pre- and postoperative concentration of TATI in serum (S-TATI) of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and methods S-TATI was determined by time resolved immunofluorometric assay in preoperative and postoperative samples that were collected from 132 RCC patients, who underwent partial or complete nephrectomy in Helsinki University Hospital from May 2005 to July 2010. Results Preoperative S-TATI was significantly associated with tumour stage, lymph-node involvement, metastatic stage, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage (CKD grade), and preoperative C-reactive protein level (p?Peer reviewe

Salvage HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer : a high-volume center experience on 100 consecutive patients

AimThis study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salvage HDR brachytherapy in patients who have undergone a thorough diagnostic process.Materials and methods100 prostate cancer patients - locally relapsed after previous radiotherapy - were treated with salvage HDR brachytherapy to a total dose of 24 Gy. Before treatment, the patients underwent PET imaging, prostate MRI, and prostate biopsies to confirm local relapse and exclude systemic disease. Concomitant ADT was applied in 69 patients. Toxicity and efficacy data were collected as a patient chart review. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0).ResultsThe 3-year bDFS and OS were 74% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 60-87%) and 93% (CI 95%: 84-100%), respectively. Acute Grade 1-2 genitourinary toxicity was observed in 70 patients, 58 patients with Grade 1 and 12 patients with Grade 2, respectively. Acute Grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 8 patients.ConclusionsThis retrospective study shows that salvage HDR brachytherapy is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for histologically proven, local radio-recurrent disease.Peer reviewe

Synthetic computed tomography based dose calculation in prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy

Background and purpose: Metallic hip prostheses cause substantial artefacts in both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images used in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) for prostate cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of a synthetic CT (sCT) generation workflow and the improvement in implant visibility using metal artefact reduction sequences. Materials and methods: The study included 23 patients with prostate cancer who had hip prostheses, of which 10 patients had bilateral hip implants. An in-house protocol was applied to create sCT images for dose calculation comparison. The study compared prostheses volumes and resulting avoidance sectors against planning target volume (PTV) dose uniformity and organs at risk (OAR) sparing. Results: Median PTV dose difference between sCT and CT-based dose calculation among all patients was 0.1 % (−0.4 to 0.4%) (median(range)). Bladder and rectum differences (V50Gy) were 0.2 % (−0.3 to 1.1%) and 0.1 % (−0.9 to 0.5%). The median 3D local gamma pass rate for partial arc cases using a Dixon MR sequence was Γ20%2mm/2% = 99.9%. For the bilateral full arc cases, using a metal artefact reconstruction sequence, the pass rate was Γ20%2mm/2% = 99.0%. Conclusions: An in-house protocol for generating sCT images for dose calculation provided clinically feasible dose calculation accuracy for prostate cancer patients with hip implants. PTV median dose difference for uni- and bilateral patients with avoidance sectors remained <0.4%. The Outphase images enhanced implant visibility resulting in smaller avoidance sectors, better OAR sparing, and improved PTV uniformity