Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Versus Fixed Dosing Intervals of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in People with Type 2 Diabetes

Background: Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) has a more constant and prolonged action profile than insulin glargine 100 U/mL and in clinical studies is associated with similar glycemic control but less hypoglycemia. Whether its effects are altered by variability of injection time was examined in two 3-month substudies. Materials and Methods: Eligible participants completing 6 months of optimized treatment with Gla-300 in EDITION 1 (n = 109) and EDITION 2 (n = 89), having a mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c)) level of 7.3 % (SD 1.0 %), were randomized (1:1) to groups advised to increase variability of between-injection intervals to 24 +/- up to 3 h or to maintain fixed 24-h intervals for 3 months. Changes of HbA(1c) level and other efficacy and safety measures were assessed. Results: In the fixed-dosing group, 64% of participants reported all intervals within the 23-25-h range, compared with 15% of those advised flexible dosing. In the fixed- and flexible-dosing groups, 12% and 41%, respectively, of between-injection intervals were outside the 23-25-h range, and 2% and 16%, respectively, were outside the 21-27-h range. Least squares mean between-group difference in HbA(1c) change from baseline was 0.05 % (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.13 to 0.23); for fasting plasma glucose, 2.7 mg/dL (95% CI, -9.0 to 14.4); and for daily basal insulin dose, 0.00 U/kg (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03). Frequencies of hypoglycemia and adverse events did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of Gla-300 demonstrated in EDITION 1 and EDITION 2 are maintained in substudies when the insulin was injected up to 3 h before or after the usual time of administration.Peer reviewe

Expression, Localization and Prognosis Association of MEP50 in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is composed of distinct subgroups, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), luminal A, and luminal B, which are associated with different prognosis. MEP50 is the main partner of the arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 required for its enzymatic activity. Here, we examined MEP50 expression in the different breast cancer subgroups from the transcriptomic data obtained on human breast cancer samples and on normal breast tissues in two cohorts (Curie, n = 141; The Cancer Genome Atlas—TCGA, n = 788). We observed higher levels of MEP50 mRNA in TNBC (Curie, n = 41; TCGA, n = 106) compared to the other breast cancer subgroups and normal breast tissues. Using an online KM-plotter database, which allows survival analyses in a larger number of breast cancer patients, we found that high MEP50 mRNA levels were associated with a more favorable recurrence-free survival (RFS) in TNBC (n = 953, p = 1.2 × 10−4) and luminal B (n = 1353, p = 0.013) tumors, whereas high PRMT5 mRNA levels were associated with worse RFS in these two subgroups (TNBC: n = 442, p = 1.0 × 10−4; luminal B: n = 566, p = 6.8 × 10−3). We next determined the expression and the subcellular localization of MEP50 protein by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in our Curie cohort of breast cancer (n = 94) and normal tissues (n = 7) using a validated MEP50 antibody. MEP50 was more expressed in breast tumors compared to normal breast tissues (p = 0.02). MEP50 was more localized to the cytosol in breast cancer cells compared to normal breast tissue (p = 4 × 10−4), and was more found at the plasma membrane in normal tissues compared to breast tumors (p = 0.01). We also evaluated PRMT5 activity by IHC in our Curie cohort using a validated antibody (H4R3me2s) detecting histone H4 symmetrically dimethylated on Arg3. High levels of H4R3me2s were found in normal breast tissues, whereas the lowest levels of H4R3me2s were observed in TNBC and HER2 breast cancer subgroups. Altogether, our study reports the expression of the PRMT5 cofactor (MEP50) and substrate (H4R3me2s) in breast cancer and highlights the association of PRMT5 and MEP50 mRNA with prognosis in luminal B and TNBC breast cancer subgroups and certain TNBC subtypes

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5: A novel therapeutic target for triple‐negative breast cancers

Abstract TNBC is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive breast cancer subtype associated with high relapse rates, and for which no targeted therapy yet exists. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), an enzyme which catalyzes the methylation of arginines on histone and non‐histone proteins, has recently emerged as a putative target for cancer therapy. Potent and specific PRMT5 inhibitors have been developed, but the therapeutic efficacy of PRMT5 targeting in TNBC has not yet been demonstrated. Here, we examine the expression of PRMT5 in a human breast cancer cohort obtained from the Institut Curie, and evaluate the therapeutic potential of pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 in TNBC. We find that PRMT5 mRNA and protein are expressed at comparable levels in TNBC, luminal breast tumors, and healthy mammary tissues. However, immunohistochemistry analyses reveal that PRMT5 is differentially localized in TNBC compared to other breast cancer subtypes and to normal breast tissues. PRMT5 is heterogeneously expressed in TNBC and high PRMT5 expression correlates with poor prognosis within this breast cancer subtype. Using the small‐molecule inhibitor EPZ015666, we show that PRMT5 inhibition impairs cell proliferation in a subset of TNBC cell lines. PRMT5 inhibition triggers apoptosis, regulates cell cycle progression and decreases mammosphere formation. Furthermore, EPZ015666 administration to a patient‐derived xenograft model of TNBC significantly deters tumor progression. Finally, we reveal potentiation between EGFR and PRMT5 targeting, suggestive of a beneficial combination therapy. Our findings highlight a distinctive subcellular localization of PRMT5 in TNBC, and uphold PRMT5 targeting, alone or in combination, as a relevant treatment strategy for a subset of TNBC

The Mediterranean region under climate change

This book has been published by Allenvi (French National Alliance for Environmental Research) to coincide with the 22nd Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP22) in Marrakesh. It is the outcome of work by academic researchers on both sides of the Mediterranean and provides a remarkable scientific review of the mechanisms of climate change and its impacts on the environment, the economy, health and Mediterranean societies. It will also be valuable in developing responses that draw on “scientific evidence” to address the issues of adaptation, resource conservation, solutions and risk prevention. Reflecting the full complexity of the Mediterranean environment, the book is a major scientific contribution to the climate issue, where various scientific considerations converge to break down the boundaries between disciplines